The W
January 14, 2014 - breakout.jpg
Views: 160543181
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Calendar | Color chart | Log in for more!
16.9.21 1001
The W - Sports that aren't Baseball, Football, Basketball, or Hockey - UFC 71, Down Goes Chuck!
This thread has 5 referrals leading to it
Register and log in to post!
Thread rated: 3.71
Pages: 1
(468 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
Post (4 total)

Since: 3.10.02
From: Right side of the tracks

Since last post: 13 days
Last activity: 13 days
#1 Posted on | Instant Rating: 2.46
No thread about this yet? ESPN was all over the pre match hype and Liddell goes out and proceeds to get his ass handed to him.
Promote this thread!
Big Bad

Since: 4.1.02
From: Dorchester, Ontario

Since last post: 1003 days
Last activity: 572 days
#2 Posted on | Instant Rating: 4.10
I don't think UFC is weeping too much from a charisma standpoint, since Rampage is marketable as hell and a great interview. Also, in case you hadn't noticed, an awesome fighter. Now UFC really has two draws -- the instant headliner in Rampage, plus the still ultra-marketable Chuck fighting his way back for a rematch. I think we can pencil in that Liddell vs. Griffin fight for September or October, provided Forrest doesn't job next month.

This was the fight where the year's themes of "the PRIDE fighter struggling in UFC" and "the underdog wins" collided, with the underdog theme continuing onwards. It's weird to think that back in October, Chuck, Hughes, Franklin, GSP and Tito were UFC"s golden boys, and now they're all either titleless or coming off losses.


Since: 18.5.02

Since last post: 5207 days
Last activity: 5207 days
#3 Posted on | Instant Rating: 2.49
I don't know how anybody can make an argument that he got his ass handed to him. He got caught with a shot. Happens all the time. This wasn't Couture whooping Sylvia's ass all over again, it was a fight that didn't really get started. It wasn't even a hard punch either.

Good show overall. The fighters must have been motivated, knowing the show would get good coverage, so the UFC needed everyone to have a good or great match.

Dan Henderson was brought into the cage after. It's Rampage vs. Hendo next.

Rumor is... Chuck may fight Wanderlei Silva next. And this will likely set a record for PPV buys whenever it happens.

(edited by chill on 28.5.07 0001)

Since: 17.1.02
From: New F'n Jersey

Since last post: 8 days
Last activity: 7 days
#4 Posted on | Instant Rating: 5.75
Since nobody else has talked about it, nearly all the fights were good to great, making for my first UFC on PPV experience into a great one. I've been watching the past events on DVD, but this was the first that friends of mine and I decided to buy. Of course I lost 10 dollars on Liddell, but what can you do?

The Karo/Burkman fight was really good, especially that first round. And then there was the upset of Keith Jardine by Houston Alexander. That was worse of a shot/shock than Rampage/Iceman in my mind.

Huge thumbs up for this show from my end, and if they do match up Chuck/Wanderlei, that will probably be PPV #2 to buy for me.

(edited by Torchslasher on 28.5.07 0641)

Click Here (

For all your CZW and Nickels Trivia information.

"Look guys, it's 'Lake Man!' Hope you can fit into our NARROW office, Mr. Big Lake" --MST3K The Collection V. 7

Click Here (
Thread rated: 3.71
Pages: 1
Thread ahead: NASCAR Founding Son: Bill France Jr. 1933-2007
Next thread: Watching the Indy 500 is painful to me
Previous thread: Landis' Business Manager Threatens LeMond
(468 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
10-8 rounds in the UFC are incredibly rare to begin with -- usually requiring complete domination from start to finish, with at least a couple knockdowns or powerful takedowns. 10-7 rounds are unheard of.
- Sobriquet, UFC 66 (2006)
Related threads: UFC 70 - The Dana White Show (with a cameo by Tito) - UFC 69 Breakdown - More...
The W - Sports that aren't Baseball, Football, Basketball, or Hockey - UFC 71, Down Goes Chuck!Register and log in to post!

The W™ message board

©2001-2021 Brothers Zim

This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.059 seconds.