I was just wondering if the one time deal with the WWE using WCW to promote their house show might have something to do with the trademark they own for it. Like, if they don't use it, they could lose it, so once in a while they put something out there called WCW. This way, some indy fed can't use the inititals because the WWE can always point their laywers at the date of that house show and say that the trademark still is in use?
I'm just trying to think of something more meaningful than "They made 315 mis-prints and haven't found any of them". I could be completely wrong on this, so don't feel bad about telling me so.
No... I feel that if they own it, they don't have to use it, you know? Since the WWF owns the WCW trademarks, no one else can use them, period.
Could be a misprint. Or it could be that WCW is, in fact, coming back in some form. I'd like to see that, but I don't know for a fact that the WWF is gonna go that route.
We'll just have to wait and see until we have more information...
“What's so great about crack?” “Uh, uh, it enhances your personality.” “Yes, but what if you're an asshole?”
It's gone now. The show isn't listed as WCW anymore, which clearly means it was a misprint or the WWE found out about it and had them fix it, as to stop giving away the future.
Which clearly means, beyond a shadow of a doubt that... it's one of those 2.
(edited by BobHollySTILLRules on 11.6.02 1403) HOLLY: How do you like me now? COLE: You're a jerk Holly! ME: (sigh) Cole ruins everything!
That sounds like a really entertaining interview. Some stuff Kurt said made sense, some of it... didnt. Some thoughts: Easy there, Kurt. I mean, maybe, but damn. Maybe so, but thats how you can tell? My the veins on his nose??? Probably. Maybe.