The W
Views: 159173515
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Color chart | Log in for more!
1.8.14 1306
The 7 - Movies & TV - You're going to be sick of Marvel movies before 2020
This thread has 2 referrals leading to it
Register and log in to post!
(6 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (8 total)
StaggerLee
Scrapple
Level: 158

Posts: 6202/7104
EXP: 49653398
For next: 1032937

Since: 3.10.02
From: Right side of the tracks

Since last post: 463 days
Last activity: 463 days
#1 Posted on 19.7.14 0925.55
Reposted on: 19.7.21 0927.10
http://www.deadline.com/2014/07/marvel-disney-untitled-release-dates-2017-2018-2019/

Disney has a plan to put out two a year for a three year period. No word on which ones will be assigned to which hero as of yet, but with Comicon here, we may know soon.

Also, saw this and had a chuckle:
(image removed)
Promote this thread!
Big Bad
Scrapple
Level: 158

Posts: 6711/7062
EXP: 50179785
For next: 506550

Since: 4.1.02
From: Dorchester, Ontario

Since last post: 957 days
Last activity: 526 days
#2 Posted on 20.7.14 0256.58
Reposted on: 20.7.21 0259.01
We already have 2015 (Avengers: Age Of Ultron, Ant-Man) and 2016 (Dr. Strange and Captain America 3) spoken for, and I would suspect the single film in 2019 will be the third Avengers movie. So that leaves four slots for 2017 and 2018, and I'll predict...

* Thor III
* Black Widow's own solo movie (with supporting roles for Falcon and Hawkeye)
* sequel for Guardians of the Galaxy, provided the first one isn't a bomb

There are plenty of options for the fourth slot. Maybe they'll try to revive Hulk again with Ruffalo getting his own movie? Maybe Scarlet Witch and Quicksilver totally steal Avengers II and they get their own movie (which would also have the added benefit for Marvel of pissing off 20th Century Fox)? Maybe an Ant-Man sequel if that movie actually succeeds despite losing Edgar Wright? Or, maybe a new character gets launched like Ms. Marvel or someone.
AWArulz
Scrapple
Level: 122

Posts: 3334/3893
EXP: 20502973
For next: 135099

Since: 28.1.02
From: Louisville, KY

Since last post: 19 days
Last activity: 2 days
AIM:  
Y!:
#3 Posted on 20.7.14 1232.30
Reposted on: 20.7.21 1232.46
    Originally posted by Big Bad

    * sequel for Guardians of the Galaxy, provided the first one isn't a bomb



That's a big IF
Zeruel
Thirty Millionth Hit
Moderator
Level: 140

Posts: 5182/5284
EXP: 32480630
For next: 805857

Since: 2.1.02
From: The Silver Spring in the Land of Mary.

Since last post: 706 days
Last activity: 706 days
#4 Posted on 21.7.14 1302.23
Reposted on: 21.7.21 1305.19
    Originally posted by AWArulz
      Originally posted by Big Bad

      * sequel for Guardians of the Galaxy, provided the first one isn't a bomb



    That's a big IF


It looks like a pretty fun movie that does not take itself seriously. I think it will take in $128,571,428 at the box office, +/- $10 million.
Mike Zeidler
Pepperoni
Level: 71

Posts: 1112/1117
EXP: 3117941
For next: 49188

Since: 27.6.02

Since last post: 2545 days
Last activity: 559 days
#5 Posted on 21.7.14 1422.54
Reposted on: 21.7.21 1424.12
When was the last time a Marvel movie didn't at least make back its budget? Like every other blockbuster this summer, I'll peg it around $200M.
dMp
Knackwurst
Level: 109

Posts: 2717/2987
EXP: 13803121
For next: 156569

Since: 4.1.02
From: The Hague, Netherlands (Europe)

Since last post: 216 days
Last activity: 3 hours
#6 Posted on 21.7.14 1456.40
Reposted on: 21.7.21 1457.49

I thought it was clear already that they had a 2nd stage (ending with Avengers 2) and 3rd stage (ending with Avengers 3) figured out. And with 2 movies a year I don't think they're overdoing it.

What will saturate the market is DC saying they want to do 2-3 movies a year asap. And of course Sony wanting to do a gazillion more Spider-man/Spidey villains movies cramped in a the same timespan.

But if it were just Marvel, I have all faith in them.
And that includes Guardians which looks to be lots of fun.
There's a rumor now that a Dr. Strange movie will be somewhat horror which means they'll once again add a different type of 'super' story to their universe.
StaggerLee
Scrapple
Level: 158

Posts: 6212/7104
EXP: 49653398
For next: 1032937

Since: 3.10.02
From: Right side of the tracks

Since last post: 463 days
Last activity: 463 days
#7 Posted on 21.7.14 1631.32
Reposted on: 21.7.21 1631.43
Amazing Spiderman 3 is on the shelf for a long time.
http://uproxx.com/gammasquad/2014/07/sony-might-be-giving-up-on-the-amazing-spider-man-3/
Zeruel
Thirty Millionth Hit
Moderator
Level: 140

Posts: 5183/5284
EXP: 32480630
For next: 805857

Since: 2.1.02
From: The Silver Spring in the Land of Mary.

Since last post: 706 days
Last activity: 706 days
#8 Posted on 21.7.14 1642.21
Reposted on: 21.7.21 1643.32
    Originally posted by Mike Zeidler
    When was the last time a Marvel movie didn't at least make back its budget?


The Marvel Cinimatic Universe domestic revenue only? The Incredible Hulk. $134 million US/Canada on a $150 million budget. Of course, it took $263 worldwide, so it turned a profit.

A film starring a Marvel character? Punisher: War Zone. It made $10 million on a $35 million budget

ALL ORIGINAL POSTS IN THIS THREAD ARE NOW AVAILABLE
Thread ahead: Lucy
Next thread: Fargo renewed! (with prelim season 2 details)
Previous thread: The Rock reveals his DC movie role(sorta)
(6 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
Related threads: X-Men Days of Future Past Spoilers - Edgar Wright leaves Ant-Man - X-Men: Day's Of Future Past trailer. - More...
The 7 - Movies & TV - You're going to be sick of Marvel movies before 2020Register and log in to post!

The W™ message board - 7 year recycle

ZimBoard
©2001-2021 Brothers Zim
This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.116 seconds.