Spiraling_Shape
Andouille
Level: 94
   
Posts: 1771/1969
EXP: 8070664
For next: 286024
Since: 2.1.02
From: PA
Since last post: 3 days
Last activity: 2 days
|  #1 Posted on 17.10.17 0646.55
Reposted on: 17.10.24 0647.38 | I felt bad that Kane never got any sort of proper send-off into retirement/politics/accounting... we don't need him in the main event scene BUT if the reason he's there is to get revenge on Roman for retiring his brother, that's an acceptable storyline. Then he can go climb back under the ring and live out his Libertarian dreams. | Promote this thread! |             | Matt Tracker
Scrapple
Level: 142
Posts: 5218/5327
EXP: 34865042
For next: 103473
Since: 8.5.03
From: North Carolina
Since last post: 73 days
Last activity: 16 days
| #2 Posted on 17.10.17 1040.16
Reposted on: 17.10.24 1040.23 | I'm of the same mind and thought his last world title reign was his victory lap and his best overall work, a high-note to go out on. And I think as of this month he hits TWENTY YEARS in the gimmick. Man.
| used2bcool
Merguez
Level: 58
Posts: 706/740
EXP: 1563686
For next: 13869
Since: 5.11.08
From: Ashland, MA
Since last post: 2511 days
Last activity: 2185 days
| #3 Posted on 17.10.17 1202.33
Reposted on: 17.10.24 1203.08 | This feels like one of those times that the E has fallen ass-backwards into something that follows internal logic. Kane's not an exciting or inspiring choice, but any exciting or inspiring choice here would just be getting a rough deal - since this match basically only exists to make the Shield (and Roman by extension) look good.
The show was okay. I'm ashamed to admit that I enjoyed heel Enzo's antics. Elias and Good Brothers were gold. Insane Alicia Fox is the best Alicia Fox. The rest felt like a large nothingburger.
The less said about Finn/Bray the better. | | ALL ORIGINAL POSTS IN THIS THREAD ARE NOW AVAILABLE |
| | | |
