The W
Views: 169987922
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Color chart | Log in for more!
29.3.16 0439
The 7 - Football - Rams say no thanks to London
This thread has 6 referrals leading to it
Register and log in to post!
(245 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
Post (3 total)
Level: 159

Posts: 5826/7105
EXP: 51801244
For next: 9626

Since: 3.10.02
From: Right side of the tracks

Since last post: 572 days
Last activity: 572 days
#1 Posted on 13.8.12 1328.47
Reposted on: 13.8.19 1328.56
From The Rams announced today that the Club will not play home games in London in 2013-14 to better focus on First Tier Process in St. Louis.

The team seems to really be giving staying in St Louis a real shot, instead of doing a dog and pony show before picking up and returning to LA. I wonder who will take their place.
Promote this thread!
Level: 89

Posts: 1317/1848
EXP: 6865503
For next: 50425

Since: 16.10.02
From: Connecticut

Since last post: 1034 days
Last activity: 1014 days
#2 Posted on 13.8.12 1845.27
Reposted on: 13.8.19 1847.11
What does First Tier Process mean?
Level: 69

Posts: 1001/1009
EXP: 2818470
For next: 51288

Since: 25.1.02
From: Chicagoland with Hoosiers, or "The Region"

Since last post: 2925 days
Last activity: 2688 days
#3 Posted on 13.8.12 2242.10
Reposted on: 13.8.19 2242.53
    Originally posted by dwaters
    What does First Tier Process mean?

If the Rams' facility is not in the FIrst Tier (top 25%) of NFL stadia by 2014, the Rams can legally break their lease with the St. Louis Convention and Visitors Bureau and leave. (Spoiler: it won't be in the top three of four tiers. Barely in the fourth.) Neither side is anywhere close, with the city proposing ~$120 million in upgrades, half to be paid for by the team, and the Rams not even putting a price tag on their counter proposal (most estimates: $750 million. Basically half a new stadium.)

There's about a sixty percent chance the excuse is utter bullshit; it may be leverage since after they announced the London games, they realized it violated their lease, hardly giving them an advantage with the arbitrator that will eventually decide if they can leave after 2014. Whatever the case, the idea that spending a week stateside instead of in the shadow of Tower Bridge will aid the effort to stay in Mound City is laughable.

Unless the team completely backs down (probably not) or the city goes batshit crazy (even less likely,) the Rams will be able to leave. Whether they will or not is harder to predict.
Thread ahead: 2012 NFL Preseason Casualities thread
Next thread: Packers sign RB Cedric Benson
Previous thread: Fare Thy Well Honey Badger
(245 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
Related threads: Rams take first step in move to leave St Louis(maybe) - So Long Spags (and Devaney) - StaggerLee - More...
The 7 - Football - Rams say no thanks to LondonRegister and log in to post!

The W™ message board - 7 year recycle

©2001-2023 Brothers Zim
This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.145 seconds.