Java
Head cheese Level: 44
    Posts: 61/332 EXP: 567577 For next: 43712
Since: 2.1.02 From: Chandler, AZ
Since last post: 139 days Last activity: 1 day
| #2 Posted on 22.7.03 1807.18 Reposted on: 22.7.10 1807.22 | Brandon is done, but that is why the Hawks wanted him. His $11 million comes off the cap in January, so it keeps them under the luxury tax and gives them some flexibility to rebuild.
Strange that the salary cap/luzury tax is making a large salary coming off the cap as valuable as a good (albeit somewhat selfish) player (Glenn Robinson) | Whitebacon
Banger Level: 105
    Posts: 607/2570 EXP: 12216870 For next: 45430
Since: 12.1.02 From: Fresno, CA
Since last post: 332 days Last activity: 40 days
| | ICQ: | |
| |
| #3 Posted on 22.7.03 1840.38 Reposted on: 22.7.10 1843.19 | | Blockbuster four-team trade near completion (espn.go.com) | evilwaldo
Lap cheong Level: 86
    Posts: 1203/1597 EXP: 5975635 For next: 166496
Since: 7.2.02 From: New York, NY
Since last post: 7533 days Last activity: 7314 days
| #4 Posted on 23.7.03 0724.19 Reposted on: 23.7.10 0724.42 |
Originally posted by tshman122 Yes and we get Glen Dog. Sure hes old but this will give us a legit yes a legit second scoring option. The T-Wolves also got Spree who gives them a second option as well. The Hawks and Knicks get screwed here as Brandon is done and Van Horn is a stiff.
This is a bad deal for the Sixers. As much as I do not like Van Horn, they now have a logjam at 3 with Robinson and Thomas, both 6'7" and nobody of any value at 4 or 5. | Battlezone
Potato korv Level: 60
    Posts: 136/696 EXP: 1681034 For next: 91754
Since: 27.2.03 From: Seattle, Washington
Since last post: 6270 days Last activity: 1003 days
| | | Y!: |  |
|
| #5 Posted on 23.7.03 1056.49 Reposted on: 23.7.10 1056.56 | At last, my Woofies don't COMPLETELY frustrate me. It looks like they're going to make a serious run at the second round and keeping KG around for the long term. They might almost have too many scorers, but as in the case of the Lakers, it's a Good Problem To Have. If this team can jell, they're going to be a threat in the West.
AOL/TW are trying to ditch the Hawks, so picking up Brandon's contract will help the team's value in the short term. I don't see that team doing anything to get better until the team is sold. And the glorious Glenn Robinson era in Atlanta ends with a THUD. | tshman122
Polska kielbasa Level: 28
    Posts: 80/125 EXP: 127083 For next: 4257
Since: 20.6.03
Since last post: 8213 days Last activity: 8016 days
| #6 Posted on 23.7.03 1247.48 Reposted on: 23.7.10 1248.49 |
Originally posted by evilwaldo
Originally posted by tshman122 Yes and we get Glen Dog. Sure hes old but this will give us a legit yes a legit second scoring option. The T-Wolves also got Spree who gives them a second option as well. The Hawks and Knicks get screwed here as Brandon is done and Van Horn is a stiff.
This is a bad deal for the Sixers. As much as I do not like Van Horn, they now have a logjam at 3 with Robinson and Thomas, both 6'7" and nobody of any value at 4 or 5.
What are you saying? We have DC at the 5 and Glen Dog will play the 4 while Thomas plays the 3. Now I know that DC and Robinson have a bit of dog in them but they are not as bad as Van Horn. Its a good trade. | JWstorm
Kolbasz Level: 51
    Posts: 404/473 EXP: 948915 For next: 65030
Since: 23.10.02 From: Tarheel State
Since last post: 7177 days Last activity: 6455 days
| #7 Posted on 23.7.03 1728.23 Reposted on: 23.7.10 1729.02 | | Big dog is definitely not a 4 | j9479
Chorizo Level: 30
    Posts: 43/144 EXP: 158473 For next: 7398
Since: 29.1.03 From: the suburbs
Since last post: 6506 days Last activity: 5314 days
| #8 Posted on 23.7.03 2224.22 Reposted on: 23.7.10 2225.16 | | i've always believed that the sixers needed a good defensive rebounder/inside scorer (Robinson) instead of a 2nd shooter. just let Iverson run wild, and have a couple of big guysaround to pick up rebounds if AI has an off night. | evilwaldo
Lap cheong Level: 86
    Posts: 1204/1597 EXP: 5975635 For next: 166496
Since: 7.2.02 From: New York, NY
Since last post: 7533 days Last activity: 7314 days
| #9 Posted on 24.7.03 1248.51 Reposted on: 24.7.10 1253.15 |
Originally posted by tshman122
Originally posted by evilwaldo
Originally posted by tshman122 Yes and we get Glen Dog. Sure hes old but this will give us a legit yes a legit second scoring option. The T-Wolves also got Spree who gives them a second option as well. The Hawks and Knicks get screwed here as Brandon is done and Van Horn is a stiff.
This is a bad deal for the Sixers. As much as I do not like Van Horn, they now have a logjam at 3 with Robinson and Thomas, both 6'7" and nobody of any value at 4 or 5.
What are you saying? We have DC at the 5 and Glen Dog will play the 4 while Thomas plays the 3. Now I know that DC and Robinson have a bit of dog in them but they are not as bad as Van Horn. Its a good trade.
I like it a lot better now that they have Jackson. But it still bothers me that the Sixers put all that money into Thomas and he will now be relegated to the second guy off the bench. | skorpio17
Morcilla Level: 57
    Posts: 392/618 EXP: 1425794 For next: 60143
Since: 11.7.02 From: New Jersey
Since last post: 6535 days Last activity: 6535 days
| #10 Posted on 25.7.03 1723.09 Reposted on: 25.7.10 1725.43 | Fie-ah Lay-den!
You know the Knicks got the worst of the deal because Layden wants all the ex-Utah players. I'd rather have every other big name thrown around: Big Dog, Sprewell, Brad Miller. Van Horn needs to stop player so soft. He can't live off his potential forever. | Whitebacon
Banger Level: 105
    Posts: 614/2570 EXP: 12216870 For next: 45430
Since: 12.1.02 From: Fresno, CA
Since last post: 332 days Last activity: 40 days
| | ICQ: | |
| |
| #11 Posted on 25.7.03 1833.07 Reposted on: 25.7.10 1833.47 |
Originally posted by skorpio17 Fie-ah Lay-den!
You know the Knicks got the worst of the deal because Layden wants all the ex-Utah players. I'd rather have every other big name thrown around: Big Dog, Sprewell, Brad Miller. Van Horn needs to stop player so soft. He can't live off his potential forever.
Well...you had Spree. | drjayphd
Scrapple Moderator Level: 128
    Posts: 1394/4035 EXP: 23897005 For next: 484761
Since: 22.4.02 From: New Hampshire
Since last post: 1448 days Last activity: 1032 days
| | ICQ: | |
| | Y!: |  |
|
| #12 Posted on 26.7.03 0029.13 Reposted on: 26.7.10 0030.05 |
Originally posted by skorpio17 Fie-ah Lay-den!
You know the Knicks got the worst of the deal because Layden wants all the ex-Utah players. I'd rather have every other big name thrown around: Big Dog, Sprewell, Brad Miller. Van Horn needs to stop player so soft. He can't live off his potential forever.
So you're saying you'd rather have Terrell Brandon? Even if it wasn't for his contract coming off the books at the end of the year, I think that woulda been a better choice, no? | | ALL ORIGINAL POSTS IN THIS THREAD ARE NOW AVAILABLE |
| | | | | | | | | | |