2010 NFL playoff seedings after week 9

January 23, 2012 - plaxico.jpg

28.11.23 1625

The W - Football - 2010 NFL playoff seedings after week 9
This thread has 5 referrals leading to it

Thread rated: 4.67
Pages: 1

(600 newer) Next thread | Previous thread

User

Post (8 total)

Zeruel
Thirty Millionth Hit
Moderator

Since: 2.1.02
From: The Silver Spring in the Land of Mary.

Since last post: 1555 days
Last activity: 1555 days

#1 Posted on 9.11.10 0703.33 | Instant Rating: 4.03

I think I have it right. If you don't count teams twice for common games when one team has 2 games and the other has 1 game against the common team, then Jax/Hou swap places due to AFC record

AFC
1. Baltimore (6-2) North leaders, Beat Pitt & NY Jets
2. NY Jets (6-2) East leaders, beat NE

3. Kansas City (5-3) West leaders, 4-3 AFC
4. Tennessee (5-3) South leaders, 1-0 div, 2-3 AFC
5. Pittsburgh (6-2) 4-1 AFC
6. New England (6-2) 5-2 AFC

7. Indianapolis (5-3)
8. Oakland (5-4)
9. Jacksonville (4-4) 1-1 div, beat Hou 2-2 in common games (IND, DAL - KC, SD), 3-3 AFC
10. Houston (4-4) 1-1 div, lost to Jax 2-3 in common games (IND, KC - DAL, IND, SD) 3-2 AFC
11. Miami (4-4) 2-4 AFC

12. San Diego (4-5)
13. Cleveland (3-5)
14. Cincinnati (2-6) 1-4 AFC
15. Denver (2-6) 1-5 AFC
16. Buffalo (0-8) *3 straight losses will eliminate them from the playoffs

Byes:
#1 Baltimore (6-2), #2 NY Jets (6-2)

1st round:
#6 New England (6-2) @ #3 Kansas City (5-3)
#5 Pittsburgh (6-2) @ #4 Tennessee (5-3)

NFC:
1. NY Giants (6-2) East leaders, 5-0 NFC
2. Atlanta (6-2) South leaders, 4-1 NFC

3. Green Bay (6-3) North leaders
4. St. Louis (4-4) West leaders, beat Seattle
5. New Orleans (6-3)
6. Chicago (5-3) 4-3 NFC

7. Philadelphia (5-3) 3-2 NFC, 1 common game, beat TB 19-21 SoV
8. Tampa Bay (5-3) 3-2 NFC, 1 common game, lost to Philly 13-27 SoV
9. Washington (4-4) 4-2 NFC
10. Seattle (4-4) 3-2 NFC
11. Minnesota (3-5) beat Arizona

12. Arizona (3-5) lost to Minnesota
13. Detroit (2-6) 2-5 NFC
14. San Francisco (2-6) 0-5 NFC
15. Carolina (1-7) 1-6 NFC
16. Dallas (1-7) 0-5 NFC

Byes:
#1 NY Giants (6-2), #2 Atlanta (6-2)

1st round:
#6 Chicago (5-3) @ #3 Green Bay (6-3)
#5 New Orleans (6-3) @ #4 St. Louis (4-4)

The AFC is (21-17) 0.553 vs the NFC

Home teams are (75-55) 0.577 so far

Div strength by out of div record
1. AFC South (14-10) 0.583 *only div with all teams 0.500 or better overall record
2. NFC South (12-9) 0.571
3. AFC North (11-9) 0.550
4t NFC East (13-13) 0.500

4t AFC East (10-10) 0.500
6. NFC North (11-12) 0.478
7. AFC West (12-14) 0.462
8. NFC West (9-15) 0.375 *only div with all teams 0.500 or worse overall record

-- 2006 Time magazine Person of the Year --

-- July 2009 Ordained Reverend --

Promote this thread!

It's False
Scrapple

Since: 20.6.02
From: I am the Tag Team Champions!

Since last post: 2078 days
Last activity: 461 days

#2 Posted on 9.11.10 2325.24 | Instant Rating: 4.80

I know people are looking over their shoulders for the Vikings to sneak in, just because Favre's the kind of guy that'll play to the bitter end. But I very much doubt that the Vikes will jump the Saints, Eagles, and Bucs to get into the playoff picture. Vikings have to be done, right?

Right?

StingArmy
Andouille

Since: 3.5.03
From: Georgia bred, you can tell by my Hawk jersey

Since last post: 2836 days
Last activity: 429 days

#3 Posted on 10.11.10 0145.32 | Instant Rating: 6.45

I like Atlanta's chances in this scenario, but boy, talk about a comically bad NFC playoff bracket.

- StingArmy

Mayhem
Scrapple

Since: 25.4.03
From: Nashville, TN

Since last post: 2318 days
Last activity: 131 days

#4 Posted on 10.11.10 0638.17 | Instant Rating: 5.32

I hate how writers are suddenly christening the Giants as an incredible team ... I seem to remember the Titans spanking that ass a few weeks ago ...

Broncolanche
Sujuk

Since: 2.6.03
From: Littleton, CO

Since last post: 4487 days
Last activity: 3739 days

#5 Posted on 10.11.10 1235.48 | Instant Rating: 4.48

Yet the Titans somehow managed to lose to the lowly Broncos.

Mayhem
Scrapple

Since: 25.4.03
From: Nashville, TN

Since last post: 2318 days
Last activity: 131 days

#6 Posted on 10.11.10 1552.21 | Instant Rating: 5.32

Originally posted by Broncolanche
Yet the Titans somehow managed to lose to the lowly Broncos.

yes, that's one that may come back to bite them ... My fear is the Titans won't make the playoffs due to having a poor conference records.

The Thrill
Banger

Since: 16.4.02
From: Green Bay, WI

Since last post: 3512 days
Last activity: 111 days

#7 Posted on 10.11.10 1912.53 | Instant Rating: 4.25

Welcome home, men of the 2nd Bn, 127th Infantry, 32d "Red Arrow" Brigade, WI Army National Guard! Job well done in Iraq!

2010-11 feels like THE MOST unpredictable year in recent NFL history.

Cases in point: Cleveland and Miami. WTF!?

This won't shake out for a while yet...so stay tuned!

NWA Wisconsin...Live, Local Pro Wrestling! Now on Facebook!

PeterStork
Sujuk

Since: 25.1.02
From: Chicagoland with Hoosiers, or "The Region"

Since last post: 3170 days
Last activity: 2932 days

#8 Posted on 10.11.10 2033.32 | Instant Rating: 4.16

Anyone else getting a bug where threads from The 7 show up under The W? For some reason the Rams are showing up as the four seed in the NFC in this thread; someone need to let Guru know to get this fixed.

exit 670 dot com | digital route 66

Tweet
Thread rated: 4.67 Pages: 1	Thread ahead: Packer goodness from NFL Films Next thread: Cam Newton Previous thread: Wade Phillips Fired	(600 newer) Next thread \| Previous thread

Damn Cardinal. I'm not looking forward to playing a 7-5 Colorado team in the Holiday Bowl. We played them in the 96 cotton bowl, 98 aloha bowl and the 01 fiesta bowl.

- ShotGunShep, The State of the BCS - Week 7 (2005)

The W - Football - 2010 NFL playoff seedings after week 9