The W
Views: 99362509
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Calendar | Color chart | Log in for more!
30.9.14 2321
The W - Pro Wrestling - "You wanna do it?" (Page 2)
This thread has 8 referrals leading to it
Register and log in to post!
Thread rated: 6.46
Pages: Prev 1 2
(2048 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (27 total)
BigDaddyLoco
Scrapple








Since: 2.1.02

Since last post: 14 hours
Last activity: 3 hours
#21 Posted on | Instant Rating: 3.95
It might be a good thing (or maybe not) that Lesnar has mellowed out over the years or else that comment by the Undertaker might have actually lead to something. I just can't see the Brock that was going to drink Coors Light and bang his wife walking away from that one.

Broncolanche
Sujuk








Since: 2.6.03
From: Littleton, CO

Since last post: 1141 days
Last activity: 393 days
#22 Posted on | Instant Rating: 4.48
    Originally posted by DJ FrostyFreeze
    I also dont think I've ever heard his real speaking voice before! How about that.
He sounded like the 'Taker during the "American Badass" era to me...
Madame Manga
Kolbasz








Since: 16.1.02
From: Silicon Valley

Since last post: 13 days
Last activity: 1 hour
#23 Posted on | Instant Rating: 10.00
I don't see this alleged 'instant shoot-fight challenge' at all -- actually, looking at that vid a couple of times, I think the interviewer's mic picked up only one phrase out of a short conversation, and that Taker was probably just nudging Brock about that WM proposal. With a little extra salt on it for the benefit of bystanders. *shrug*

If you ever watched that old DVD of Taker's from the biker era, "This Is My Yard", he was in natural speaking voice throughout. But yeah, it's kind of startling to hear him now after years of 100% kayfabe Deadman. My 12-year-old wrestling fan son watched the interview over my shoulder and literally didn't recognize the Undertaker. :D
shawnpatrick
Kishke








Since: 31.7.07
From: Leesville SC

Since last post: 867 days
Last activity: 749 days
#24 Posted on | Instant Rating: 1.59
Like I have said, unless it's proven beyond a shadow of a doubt, it's never a shoot and always a work.

This is a work, McMahon and Dana White agreed to do this to get a feeler on how it might go.

If there is money to be made, trust me, Vince McMahon and Dana White will make a deal to allow Undertaker vs Lesnar.

Although my money still says Undertaker vs Cena at Wrestlemania. No way they can build Kane to be a threat to the streak... Only Cena could be built as such...
Moss
Summer sausage








Since: 23.9.10
From: Calgary, AB

Since last post: 47 days
Last activity: 15 days
#25 Posted on | Instant Rating: 6.92
No doubt there's money to be made, but I think Dana is smart enough to consider long-term money over short-term. Brock returning would be a credibility hit to UFC/MMA which doesn't seem worth the few million Dana could get from it.



Shut up, Josh!
JustinShapiro
Scrapple
Moderator








Since: 12.12.01
From: Pittsburgh, PA

Since last post: 2 hours
Last activity: 36 min.
#26 Posted on | Instant Rating: 8.81
    Originally posted by shawnpatrick
    Like I have said, unless it's proven beyond a shadow of a doubt, it's never a shoot and always a work.


This is a pretty terrible dictum. Did you think Owen Hart was coming back as the Higher Power?

    Originally posted by shawnpatrick
    This is a work, McMahon and Dana White agreed to do this to get a feeler on how it might go.


Dana White was not involved in that. Brock Lesnar already had the offer, so he was just in worker mode/fighter hyper mode in that you always react for business.


    Although my money still says Undertaker vs Cena at Wrestlemania. No way they can build Kane to be a threat to the streak... Only Cena could be built as such...


I want Undertaker/Cena too. Meltzer last night said that they were now talking about UT/Kane since Kane is the greatest threat to WM with three wins. Alvarez was told UT/Wade. I'm for anyone but Kane.
KJames199
Scrapple
Moderator








Since: 10.12.01
From: #yqr

Since last post: 8 days
Last activity: 1 hour
#27 Posted on | Instant Rating: 7.88
    Originally posted by JustinShapiro
    Meltzer last night said that they were now talking about UT/Kane since Kane is the greatest threat to WM with three wins. Alvarez was told UT/Wade. I'm for anyone but Kane.
I could go for Undertaker vs. Kane, loser must retire. I wouldn't bother watching it, but the outcome would only help the company either way. Undertaker's hurting all the time and Kane is boring and stale.
Pages: Prev 1 2
Thread rated: 6.46
Pages: Prev 1 2
Thread ahead: RAW #909 10/25/10
Next thread: Wrestlicious: The End of an Era?
Previous thread: Bragging Rights Results
(2048 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
Who else saw this gem? And what did you think? I have thorougly enjoyed all of London's Velocity matches so far. Typically, I watch a show and then during the rerun, I tape the high quality wrestling matches.
Related threads: Stand Up For WWE - Matt Hardy Released (Finally) - Guess who is Campaigning for Linda now - More...
The W - Pro Wrestling - "You wanna do it?" (Page 2)Register and log in to post!

The W™ message board

ZimBoard
©2001-2014 Brothers Zim

This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.343 seconds.