A lot of people, myself included, have given Vince McMahon much shit for bad booking, stale product, and other things that should NEVER happen with a roster as deep as the WWF's. But I must give the man props for one thing. He's in his mid/late 50's and his physique is AWESOME! I don't know if he's back on the roids or not, but I can only hope (and work out 3 hours daily) that I look that good in MY 50s. The man is built better than a lot of the WWF superstars.
There are no facts-only observational postulates in an endlessly regenerative hodgepodge of predictions. Consensus reality requires a fixed frame of reference. In a multilevel, infinite universe, there can be no fixity; thus, no absolute consensus reality. In a relativistic universe, it appears impossible to test the reliability of any expert by requiring him to agree with another expert. Both can be correct, each in his own inertial system.
Truth be told, the idea isn't that bad. I mean, what's the differrence realyl between that and Mankind ca. 1997? But do we really need to saddle the Gldust character or Dustin Runnels the wrestler with this thing?