Originally posted by Ringmistress TAG partner for life. Okay, well that's better. I'm no homophobe of course, but it's freaky to see a gay or whatever you call it wedding on a WWE broadcast, even by their standards. I thought the WWE for many is the last refuge of the heteros. Well, if they want to do it that way, who am I to stop them? As far as caring, well, sorry.
If that's the way Billy and Chuck and the WWE want to do things then why not? It's not just a choice, it's a way of life and I support them in booking it that way. I am absoultely proud that any two human beings can make that commitment regardless of race, gender, background, or religion. It's a big step and I'm proud of them.
I mean, how many people could swear to tag with just one person for the rest of their life? I couldn't do it, and I admire those that can. ESPECIALLY Billy with his amazing history of having so many partners. That's a man who's all about commitment now.*
*last two sentences written by Panda Mask.
"When I have children I'll do as much to encourage them to read as possible. You know, like hit them if they don't." Douglas Adams
Yeah, I shouldn't put the cart before the horse, you're right. But why couldn't they save this for like a sweeps month or something? Maybe it is a mass exodus to RAW, which I wouldn't mind as long as we have somewhat of a tag team division again..
triple h has not beaten booker t OR van dam in a one-on-one matchup without interference. but i'd use booker t before i'd use rvd, simply because rvd too easily let triple h's screwing him over go away without a fight.