canis582
Mettwurst
   
   
    
  
Since: 5.1.04
From: Reading, Pa
Since last post: 2041 days
Last activity: 1716 days
| AIM: |  |
| | |
|  #2 Posted on 10.6.06 1456.45 | Instant Rating: 2.35 | Well that was a misleading headline...
I just remembered that im absent minded
wait i mean i lost my mind, i cant find it. | geemoney
Scrapple
 
Since: 26.1.03
From: Naples, FL
Since last post: 1 day
Last activity: 2 hours
| AIM: |  |
| | |
| #3 Posted on 10.6.06 1738.56 | Instant Rating: 5.40 | It's funny that someone who works for the Department of Economic Development (Misti Preston) has more of a "wrestler" name than the actual wrestler being discussed (Julie Utley).
College, sports and more!: Experience It
| jwrestle
Lap cheong
Since: 4.4.03
From: Nitro WV
Since last post: 36 days
Last activity: 1 day
| #4 Posted on 10.6.06 2132.09 | Instant Rating: 1.09 | Interesting article but she's right. Virginia, one of those type deals, has wrestler licenses and you have to have physical on record before you start. If they don't have the physical on record send the doctors to the events to stop you from wrestling. I've been first hand witness of this.
If you can't beat'em whack'em with a chair! 
 and 
______________Don't cross Mr. Cheese!____________Pam Anderson and Trish Stratus make that hot! | TheBucsFan
TheChiefsFan
Since: 2.1.02
Since last post: 9 hours
Last activity: 2 hours
| #5 Posted on 11.6.06 0717.08 | Instant Rating: 4.42 | Originally posted by canis582
Well that was a misleading headline...
What could you possibly have thought the story was about, than?
As for the story, this bit pretty much displays the flaw in this woman's logic:
Opponents said if the state's motive is legal protection, it could make wrestlers sign a waiver saying they will not sue if they get hurt.
What if the state's motive is protecting an unborn baby? |
| | | |
