The W
Views: 95659929
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Calendar | Color chart | Log in for more!
19.4.14 1720
The W - Pro Wrestling - WWF changes names of two PPVs... Why?
This thread has 13 referrals leading to it
Register and log in to post!
Pages: 1(12888 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (6 total)
The Tino Standard
Bauerwurst








Since: 2.1.02
From: Ohio University (originally hailing from Concord, OH)

Since last post: 3840 days
Last activity: 3750 days
#1 Posted on
I just read on WWF.com that they are going to name the July PPV "Vengeance" and then give the December event the name "Armaggedon" again.

Didn't they change the name of the December PPV because of Sept. 11 (and Raw is War becomes just "Raw")? Why would they go back? And what was wrong with Fully Loaded? And on top of THAT, are they so limited for PPV name ideas that they had to recycle one that they JUST used?
Promote this thread!
James F'n X
Bockwurst








Since: 2.1.02
From: Seattle, WA

Since last post: 2899 days
Last activity: 2866 days
AIM:  
#2 Posted on
Well, the July PPV last year was InVasion. So either they're recycling Fully Loaded or they're recycling Vengeance. 6 of one, half dozen of the other.

As for Armageddon, maybe they feel like the climate has cooled down enough to bust out the badass Armageddon logo.



"In our short film, we've come long ways..."
Wild Pegasus
Weisswurst








Since: 24.4.02

Since last post: 4196 days
Last activity: 4196 days
AIM:  
#3 Posted on
Since we missed Fully Loaded last year, some fans may have forgotten it. It wasn't very special, as KotR was right before it and Summerslam was after. People will remember Vengance, if only for the title tournament, and Armageddon is just so damn awesome with its logo that it deserves to be brought back. In my opinion, I would replace Judgement Day with Fulley Loaded next year, but that's just me.



Wild Pegasus
ekedolphin
Scrapple








Since: 12.1.02
From: Indianapolis, IN; now residing in Suffolk, VA

Since last post: 4 days
Last activity: 18 hours
#4 Posted on | Instant Rating: 4.52

Well, since WCW is almost completely out of existence now (with the exception of the nWo, which, to me, is far more synonomous with WCW than the WWF), I guess the WWF felt that having another inVasion PPV would just be... well, utterly pointless.

I'm not sure I would have brought back the Armageddon name, despite the somewhat cooled climate. I'm sure the WWF has to realize that even though (by that point) Sept. 11th would be fifteen months behind us, it doesn't mean people will forget. I was working that Tuesday morning and I saw the live coverage... it's something I know I'll never forget. But I certainly don't believe the Armageddon name is being brought back as some malicious attempt by Vince McMahon to brutally remind us of the attacks.

Anyway. If I had to bring back the Armageddon name, I would have kept Vengeance for December, and moved Armageddon up to July to fill the Fully Loaded/inVasion slot. Vengeance is probably still fresh in most casual fans' minds (I know it is in mine), and it does seem weird to have another Vengeance in only three more months.

At least, that's the way I see it. But hell... in another year, it'll probably be second nature to us.

Speaking of pay-per-views being rescheduled. I remember reading on DDT Digest that WCW Starrcade used to be somewhat of a Thanksgiving tradition. But when the WWF competed with it by bringing in Survivor Series, WCW moved Starrcade to December. I'm sure that must have been weird to fans watching at the time. But since I only started watching WCW in 1997, not having Starrcade in December would have been the damned oddest thing in the world to me. Turns out, I found out in 2001 that I was right. *sigh*...

But now I'm going off on a tangent.



“If there's anything I hate, it's a loud-mouthed Canadian with blonde hair who dresses like a rock star... except you, you're cool.”

--Kurt Angle to Chris Jericho, Smackdown 4/11/2002


Support your local indy fed. Mine is WCWO.

OlFuzzyBastard
Knackwurst








Since: 28.4.02
From: Pittsburgh, PA

Since last post: 13 days
Last activity: 11 days
AIM:  
#5 Posted on
In fact, if the WWF is going to change the name of the July and December PPVs, why not throw history a bone and call them Bash At The Beach and Starrcade?



"It's a sad day when mocking one's opponent via midget becomes an acceptable form of entertainment."
--Lance Storm
Travis
Boerewors








Since: 7.3.02
From: Baltimore, MD

Since last post: 4351 days
Last activity: 4288 days
AIM:  
ICQ:  
#6 Posted on

    Originally posted by OlFuzzyBastard
    In fact, if the WWF is going to change the name of the July and December PPVs, why not throw history a bone and call them Bash At The Beach and Starrcade?


On numerous occasions Vince has publicly expressed a desire to bury the WCW name and all of it's trademarks. Hence we had the ludicrous "World Title" run for the Rock.



Fueled by Guinness, powered by YOUR LOVE.
Damn straight.
RandomWrestling:We F'n Own.
Pages: 1Thread ahead: Rock in the crowd on RAW.
Next thread: Am I the only one???
Previous thread: Jericho rules
(12888 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
The main problem for Austin this time compared to the last time he returned is that there are few guys on RAW who can elevate Austin from the decent level to the good to great level like he had in 2001.
The W - Pro Wrestling - WWF changes names of two PPVs... Why?Register and log in to post!

The W™ message board

ZimBoard
©2001-2014 Brothers Zim

This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.45 seconds.