BoromirMark
Potato korv
   
   


        
       
    
Since: 8.5.02 From: Milan-Ann Arbor, MI
Since last post: 142 days Last activity: 113 days
| AIM: | |
| | |
| #2 Posted on 27.2.04 2225.04 | Instant Rating: 1.51 | Eh, get rid of Hogan/Rock and put in Hogan/Warrior from 6 and that's the list right there.
"People use freedom of speech to make up for freedom of thought, which they lack." - Kierkegaard
 | asteroidboy
Andouille
   
   


         
       
     
Since: 22.1.02 From: Texas
Since last post: 912 days Last activity: 783 days
| #3 Posted on 27.2.04 2226.31 | Instant Rating: 4.95 |
Originally posted by BoromirMark Eh, get rid of Hogan/Rock and put in Hogan/Warrior from 6 and that's the list right there.
Agreed on Hogan/Warrior, tho I'd get rid of HHH/Taker instead. No WAY that should be in there.
(edited by asteroidboy on 27.2.04 2226)
-- Asteroid Boy
Wiener of the day: 23.7.02
"My brother saw the Undertaker walking through an airport." - Rex "Was he no-selling?" - Me
| OMEGA
Lap cheong
   
   


         
       
      
Since: 18.6.02 From: North Cacalacky
Since last post: 1424 days Last activity: 1392 days
| #4 Posted on 27.2.04 2250.58 | Instant Rating: 5.57 | Battle royals generally suck, and the one at WrestleMania IV was no exception. I don't know why this is in there. Undertaker v. Triple H was a pretty good match, but nowhere NEAR the top 10 in 'Mania history. Austin v. Michaels wasn't as good as it could have been if both were 100%, but considering the condition they were in(especially Michaels), and still putting on a match around ***, they deserve some accolades.
Andre v. Hogan is one of the worst matches I've ever seen (I think me and my brother put on better looking matches in my backyard when I was 9), but the match wasn't about quality, and I can see why this is on the card. Hogan v. Rock is a really overrated match, but was more of a 'feel-good' match (Hogan v. Warrior falls under the same category, btw), and I can see why this made it as well.
I'd have to agree whole-heartidly with the rest of the list.
(edited by OMEGA on 27.2.04 2352)
The answer to WWE's financial problems...
 | tsmstu
Chourico
   
   


        
      
     
Since: 12.7.03
Since last post: 2419 days Last activity: 1866 days
| #5 Posted on 27.2.04 2255.01 | Instant Rating: 0.57 | taker vs. HHH is FOR SURE not worthy of the list...
the HBK/Austin match is probably on there at #1 because it was what "officially" launched the attitude era...
the WMIV battle royal was also important because it was the match that launched Bret Hart as a babyface and as a singles star..
Hogan/Rock should 100% be on there because it truly was sureal..
Warrior/Hogan and TLC should have made the list...
no tag matches were listed...that would be an interesting list..top 10 tag matches in Mania history...
www.stustone.com
(edited by tsmstu on 27.2.04 2101) | jerkflavorkoolaid
Cotechino
   
   

       
     
   
Since: 3.2.04 From: west covina, CA
Since last post: 1682 days Last activity: 1682 days
| #6 Posted on 27.2.04 2308.27 | Instant Rating: 0.47 | | With all due respect, Benoit/Angle should not be there as well. Sure,it was a good match, but nowhere near the top 10 of all time WM matches. I'd replace that with Owen vs Bret. Also Hogan vs Warriar must be on that list, the fact that its not proves how retarded WWE can be. | OMEGA
Lap cheong
   
   


         
       
      
Since: 18.6.02 From: North Cacalacky
Since last post: 1424 days Last activity: 1392 days
| #7 Posted on 27.2.04 2312.35 | Instant Rating: 5.57 | Personally, I thought Benoit/Angle was around a ****1/2 match, which probably does rank it in the top 10.
Owen/Bret should DEFINITLEY be in there, and I really can't understand why it was left out (especially since Vince and Bret have seemed to mend a lot of their differences over the years).
IMO, I feel Hogan/Warrior is WAAAAAAAAY overrated as a match, and I don't think it has enough historical signifigance to be considered in the top 10. For me, it's kind of a 'on the fence' match. I wouldn't argue if it was on the list, and I'm not arguing that it was left off the list.
The answer to WWE's financial problems...
 | jerkflavorkoolaid
Cotechino
   
   

       
     
   
Since: 3.2.04 From: west covina, CA
Since last post: 1682 days Last activity: 1682 days
| #8 Posted on 27.2.04 2316.31 | Instant Rating: 0.47 | | OMEGA, I have one question for you...how old were you at the time of WM6? There is no way someone who actually followed that storyline would think it doesnt belong on the top 10. Hogan lost for the first time ever as that character cleanly. That is one of the most significant moments in the history of pro wrestling. I don't care how much you guys hate Hogan and think Warriar was a joke, you have to admit it's true. | tsmstu
Chourico
   
   


        
      
     
Since: 12.7.03
Since last post: 2419 days Last activity: 1866 days
| #9 Posted on 28.2.04 0030.51 | Instant Rating: 0.57 | again - Hogan/Warrior should have 100% been there...especially since HBK/Austin and WMIV Battle Royal are clearly listed for "impotance" reasons if anyting else...
I can't believe I forgot about Owen/Bret..that was also an awesome match..
Foley never had a big mania match did he? | jerkflavorkoolaid
Cotechino
   
   

       
     
   
Since: 3.2.04 From: west covina, CA
Since last post: 1682 days Last activity: 1682 days
| #10 Posted on 28.2.04 0034.07 | Instant Rating: 0.42 | | Not really. Foley's biggest Mania matches would be w/ Terry Funk vs The Outlaws, and his 4 way at WM2000. | Stilton
Frankfurter
   
   


        
       
     
Since: 7.2.04 From: Canada
Since last post: 2666 days Last activity: 2666 days
| #11 Posted on 28.2.04 0035.01 | Instant Rating: 2.14 | What about Hogan/Andre?
So sayeth Randy Stilton. | tsmstu
Chourico
   
   


        
      
     
Since: 12.7.03
Since last post: 2419 days Last activity: 1866 days
| #12 Posted on 28.2.04 0122.47 | Instant Rating: 0.57 | | what about it? | jerkflavorkoolaid
Cotechino
   
   

       
     
   
Since: 3.2.04 From: west covina, CA
Since last post: 1682 days Last activity: 1682 days
| #13 Posted on 28.2.04 0123.58 | Instant Rating: 0.42 | | yea, what about it? Hmm?? Huh??? WHAT?!! | snyperstyle
Weisswurst
   
   

       
     
    
Since: 25.2.04
Since last post: 3365 days Last activity: 3361 days
| #14 Posted on 28.2.04 0142.10 | Instant Rating: 0.00 | | Bret Hart Vs Shawn Michaels Ironman Match shouldve been there.and Lesnar vs Angle |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |