The W
Views: 95787156
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Calendar | Color chart | Log in for more!
24.4.14 1435
The W - Pro Wrestling - WWE getting more Tape librars? (Page 2)
This thread has 41 referrals leading to it
Register and log in to post!
Thread rated: 3.42
Pages: Prev 1 2
(4662 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (22 total)
dMp
Banger








Since: 4.1.02
From: The Hague, Netherlands (Europe)

Since last post: 3 days
Last activity: 5 hours
#21 Posted on | Instant Rating: 6.00
    Originally posted by XPacArmy
      Originally posted by DangerDan
      Dose anyone know where WWE keeps all of these tape libraries?


    I might be wrong but don't they keep them in their New York studio? I thought I heard that once but it would make sense for them to keep them in HQ in Connecticut as well.

    (edited by XPacArmy on 3.11.05 2135)


I do hope they would be smart and make (digital) copies of everything right away and then put them somewhere safe and quiet..




*sigh* Why bother?
DangerDan
Loukanika








Since: 29.10.05

Since last post: 2854 days
Last activity: 2827 days
#22 Posted on | Instant Rating: 0.00
I don't think they make copies. I've heard they keep them in the HQ in Stanford but, that just what i've heard. What kind of tapes dose WWE use anyway? I know Vince owns AWA,NWA,Jim Crockett Promotions, SMW, WCW, ECW. I don't know if he owns anymore or not.
Pages: Prev 1 2
Thread rated: 3.42
Pages: Prev 1 2
Thread ahead: Japanese Culture Question/Tajiri
Next thread: Joey Styles at WWE
Previous thread: TNA's New Year's Eve Special
(4662 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
At one point during the "Thoughtless" video, I asked my friend just what Jonathan Davis was waering. His reply? "One whole cow."
- commie_050, Big Show's Leather Blazer (2002)
Related threads: Jarrett meets with WWE - The-W WWE Fantasy - J.R.'s last interview up at WWE.com - More...
The W - Pro Wrestling - WWE getting more Tape librars? (Page 2)Register and log in to post!

The W™ message board

ZimBoard
©2001-2014 Brothers Zim

This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.406 seconds.