The W
Views: 100918280
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Calendar | Color chart | Log in for more!
27.11.14 1709
The W - Current Events & Politics - WWE/Canadian Gov't Present Annoying PSAs
This thread has 25 referrals leading to it
Register and log in to post!
Thread rated: 5.00
Pages: 1
(827 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (18 total)
Freeway
Scrapple








Since: 3.1.02
From: Calgary

Since last post: 340 days
Last activity: 28 days
#1 Posted on | Instant Rating: 5.68
Anybody who's watched RAW on TSN or Smackdown on The Score over the past two months or so have undoubtedly noticed the Public Service Announcements done by Intercontinental Champion Shelton Benjamin and Diva Search winner Christy Hemme, reminding everyone to NOT SMOKE. On top of that, the national feeds for TSN & The Score come from Toronto, so us Westerners have to sit through the god-awfully annoying Ontario Government anti-smoking propaganda AND the federal government's own anti-smoking commercials.

I get it. They don't want us smoking. LEAVE US ALONE. Anyone else want to vent?



DVDs; Blog
~New Our Lady Peace album "Vampires" this March~
Promote this thread!
Nag
Landjager








Since: 10.1.03
From: Enter your city here

Since last post: 2212 days
Last activity: 267 days
Y!:
#2 Posted on | Instant Rating: 4.55
I'll rant

Do you get TRUTH.com commercials in Canada? If that's a no, consider yourselves lucky to have Shelton. If you haven't seen them, it's a bunch of dread locked and haggard looking college kids running around pulling Micheal Mooreesque shenanigans on Big Tobacco and the general public, reminding us all, that smoking is linked to everything from heart disease to nuclear holocaust. I'm sure it funded by the government, but hey, they need the youth healthy to go die in the middle east no?

On the smoking front, my favorite is the PSA where they say smoking is the leading cause of house fires in the U.S., all the while having a camera slowly traverse through a remnants of a once happy household.

http://www.usfa.fema.gov/statistics/national/residential/loss_fire.shtm



(edited by Nag on 5.2.05 0554)
The Goon
Boudin blanc
Moderator








Since: 2.1.02
From: Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Since last post: 1 hour
Last activity: 1 hour
#3 Posted on | Instant Rating: 8.08
I have no problem with them. In addition to the spots from Shelton and Christy, there are commercials for stupid.ca featuring a girl rubbing herself in dogshit in a park and talking about what's stupider-that or smoking. It's certainly attention-grabbing.

My guess is that stupid.ca is the Canadian equivalent of thetruth.com (whose commercials we also get), and if you dig a little deeper, the money for these ads are actually from big tobacco.

Freeway420, from your age, I'm going to guess you don't recall the Canadian "Break Free" campaign from the late 80s/early 90s, which featured a poster of Luba coming to life and singing and dancing the "break free" song with startled teens who choose to dance with Luba rather than smoke. (Please don't ask "Who's Luba?")

I'm behind any efforts to curb smoking, so I ain't complaining.
BigVitoMark
Lap cheong








Since: 10.8.02
From: Queen's University, Canada

Since last post: 3413 days
Last activity: 3322 days
ICQ:  
#4 Posted on | Instant Rating: 3.14
Well that's just great. I'd forgotten about those 'break free' ads for about 15 years, and now I have the song stuck in my head. Stupid Goon.

My problem with these ads is not that they are annoying, but rather that they cost a hell of a lot of taxpayer money. If you want to stop people from smoking tax them out of the market, and if that isn't going to stop them from lighting up then, well, neither are these commercials. There are any number of ways this money could be better spent.

(edited by BigVitoMark on 5.2.05 0927)


Screw Ricky
The Goon
Boudin blanc
Moderator








Since: 2.1.02
From: Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Since last post: 1 hour
Last activity: 1 hour
#5 Posted on | Instant Rating: 8.08
Sorry, man. Not only was the song annoying, but what about that weird interpretive dance she did?

From Health Canada's "Social Marketing in Health Promotion" website:

"Break Free" (1985)

In 1985 Health Canada launched the successor to Generation. Objectives were to persuade young people 12 to 17 to maintain non-smoking attitude/ behaviour as they pass from childhood to adolescence; to position non-smoking as the normal and smoking as the abnormal activity and to establish that non-smoking is the socially acceptable behaviour and to influence group pressure. The Break Free campaign used TV, radio, bus and transit shelter posters, magazine ads, targeted publications, special promotions and activities, such as poster and lyric-writing contests. The campaign featured popular entertainers (singer Luba and Candi) and sports heroes as role models for young people, and equated not smoking with such qualities as charisma, stardom, leadership, and having a positive self-concept.
Oliver
Scrapple








Since: 20.6.02
From: Kolob

Since last post: 20 hours
Last activity: 3 hours
#6 Posted on | Instant Rating: 2.76
I'm not a smoker, and I don't like cigarette smoke...but I totally agree with the sentiment expressed here.

If someone doesn't know that smoking's bad for them by now, they need to get out from under the rock they've been hiding. It's bad enough that 75 freaking percent of a pack of cigarettes is dedicated to showing a cancerous lung, or what have you.

So, guess what? Smoking kills. Smoking is bad. I don't need that to be nailed down my throat every time I watch pro wrestling.

Those who smoke often don't have much a choice in the manner. No, they're not forced to smoke, but it would probably feel like it, as I would imagine some addictions do. Now, some people struggling with that may be disgusted with what they see, but myself, I'm disgusted that the GOVERNMENT, who makes a great sum off of tobacco taxes and tariffs, would resort to this kind of advertisement.

It's bad enough that it's illegal to smoke in public establishments in Ontario...like restaurants, bars, bowling alleys, and such...but to be confronted with this AT HOME? That's just wrong.

Whew. Pretty good for a non-smoker, huh? :-D



I've seen the following movies so far this year:
Coach Carter
Check out my website
BigVitoMark
Lap cheong








Since: 10.8.02
From: Queen's University, Canada

Since last post: 3413 days
Last activity: 3322 days
ICQ:  
#7 Posted on | Instant Rating: 3.14
    Originally posted by SOK
    It's bad enough that it's illegal to smoke in public establishments in Ontario...like restaurants, bars, bowling alleys, and such...but to be confronted with this AT HOME? That's just wrong.


I'm also a non-smoker, and I agree that it sucks that it's illegal to smoke in restaurants and bars. I hate the smell of cigarette smoke as much as the next guy, but it used to be that I knew I'd have to put up with it if I wanted to go bowling. That was just part of the deal. I say if you own a restaurant and want to let people smoke, they should be allowed to smoke as much as they want.

Having said that, smoking outside in public needs to be outlawed immediately. I can make the decision of whether I want to go to the smoky bar that is someone else's private property, but I should be allowed to walk down the sidewalk without getting smoke blown in my face. Some people are so hysterical about smoking that logic just takes a holiday, and it's frustrating.



Screw Ricky
ShotGunShep
Frankfurter








Since: 20.2.03

Since last post: 2573 days
Last activity: 2459 days
#8 Posted on | Instant Rating: 5.29
I was surprised to see those huge labels on canadian tobacco products. You guys don't mess around!
The Goon
Boudin blanc
Moderator








Since: 2.1.02
From: Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Since last post: 1 hour
Last activity: 1 hour
#9 Posted on | Instant Rating: 8.08
No, we don't.

Cerebus
Scrapple








Since: 17.11.02

Since last post: 23 hours
Last activity: 5 hours
#10 Posted on | Instant Rating: 2.34
    Originally posted by The Goon
    No, we don't.




Holy shit! Is THAT an actual pack of cancer sticks up there?

Why do we only have the little, tine, small print ad warnings on the side of the packs here where no one ever looks?



Cerebus: RIP 1977-2004.

"What do you think it's like being created by a manic-depressive, paranoid schizophrenic, hypochondriac, misogynist with delusions of grandeur and a messiah complex?"
TheBucsFan
TheChiefsFan








Since: 2.1.02

Since last post: 107 days
Last activity: 107 days
#11 Posted on | Instant Rating: 4.42
    Originally posted by Cerebus
    Why do we only have the little, tine, small print ad warnings on the side of the packs here where no one ever looks?


Because anything more might actually have an impact.
AWArulz
Knackwurst








Since: 28.1.02
From: Louisville, KY

Since last post: 10 hours
Last activity: 7 hours
AIM:  
Y!:
#12 Posted on | Instant Rating: 4.77
    Originally posted by TheBucsFan
      Originally posted by Cerebus
      Why do we only have the little, tine, small print ad warnings on the side of the packs here where no one ever looks?


    Because anything more might actually have an impact.


Yep.That was a TAME pack of Canuck cancer sticks, Most of them haver screwed up lungs, detroyed lips and other ugliness. Cagarette pack holders are big in your Canadian lands.



You're putting Descartes before the horse!
fuelinjected
Banger








Since: 12.10.02
From: Canada

Since last post: 3297 days
Last activity: 3297 days
#13 Posted on | Instant Rating: 4.67
Here's one mroe I could find:




I think they're a pretty effective scare tactic for a lot of kids that are on the fence about smoking. A lot more so then Christy Hemme telling you that you're stupid if you smoke.



"When did they pass a law that says the people who make my sandwich have to be wearing gloves? I'm not comfortable with this. I don't want glove residue all over my food; it's not sanitary. Who knows where these gloves have been?" - George Carlin
Teapot
Kishke








Since: 1.8.02
From: Louisville KY

Since last post: 199 days
Last activity: 9 hours
#14 Posted on | Instant Rating: 3.53
"You could have cigarettes that came in a black pack... with a skull and crossbones on the front... called TUMORS... and people would still be lined up around the block, going, 'I can't wait to get my hands on these fucking things. I bet you get a tumor as soon as you light up. *puffpuffpuff*'" -- Denis Leary



Freeway
Scrapple








Since: 3.1.02
From: Calgary

Since last post: 340 days
Last activity: 28 days
#15 Posted on | Instant Rating: 5.68
For the curious, I did a running recap on one of the Image Comics board of the January 24th RAW.

My findings (in the field of anti-smoking propaganda):
-5 Anti-Smoking ads, all funded (in whole or in part) by our friends in the federal government.

I LOVE how they're trying to get people to stop smoking. It's a great idea...but the fact that they're continually getting huge sums of money from tobacco sales (all the while continually jacking up the price of cigarettes via tax hikes) while telling smokers they're stupid seems fairly absurd.

EDIT FOR BELOW: And I'm Canadian, so thankfully any and all diseases caused in whole or in part by cigarettes get treatment paid for by our taxes.

(edited by Freeway420 on 6.2.05 2224)


DVDs; Blog
~New Our Lady Peace album "Vampires" this March~
messenoir
Summer sausage








Since: 20.2.02
From: Columbia, MO

Since last post: 581 days
Last activity: 447 days
AIM:  
#16 Posted on | Instant Rating: 4.82
Tell you what, when smokers want to start footing the entire bill taxpayers must pay for smoking related diseases, then come to me and say its none of our business what smokers do.

Advocate a bill that all smoking related diseases are paid for by a tax on cigerrates and I'll feel sorry for smokers. Until then, I'm going to fully enjoy going to see concerts without feeling like my lungs are being killed very quickly by the oppressive cloud of cigerrate smoke.



Imagine no possessions
I wonder if you can
No need for greed or hunger
A brotherhood of man
Imagine all the people
Sharing all the world

You may say that I'm a dreamer
But I'm not the only one
I hope someday you'll join us
And the world will live as one
Corajudo
Frankfurter








Since: 7.11.02
From: Dallas, TX

Since last post: 142 days
Last activity: 13 days
#17 Posted on | Instant Rating: 6.24
Tell you what, when smokers want to start footing the entire bill taxpayers must pay for smoking related diseases, then come to me and say its none of our business what smokers do.

Maybe it's just the contrarian in me, so take it with a grain of salt, but I think you could make the argument that a smoker actually costs the government less money over their lifetime than a nonsmoker.

On the whole, the smoker will die sooner and will usually die from some severe disease (oftentimes the first serious disease that hits them--whether it's cancer, emphysema, whatever). So, for the vast majority of their adult life, they are paying taxes and their marginal cost to the government would be the medical costs associated with that one big disease. On the other hand, the nonsmoker will live longer, which will have a couple of effects. First, they collect more social security (or whatever the equivalent in other countries), which costs the government more. Second, they have higher medical costs over their lifetime because they have normal age related sicknesses and hospital stays (not to mention the other health problems that occur as the body ages rapidly).

It's kind of macabre to think about, but if the government truly wanted to minimize their costs, they might actually encourage smoking. Maybe they should make nonsmokers foot the bill for all those costs associated with longer life. Just playing devil's advocate...
Zeruel
Thirty Millionth Hit
Moderator








Since: 2.1.02
From: The Silver Spring in the Land of Mary.

Since last post: 7 days
Last activity: 2 days
#18 Posted on | Instant Rating: 4.05
Corajudo -- The dead smokers family will collect survivor's benefits, so it is all a wash in the end.




The Catastrophic Annihilation War Room
"We've got separation of powers, checks and balances, and Margaret, vetoing things and sending them back to the Hill!"

Thread rated: 5.00
Pages: 1
Thread ahead: Author: Bush 41 = Deep Throat
Next thread: NAB head blasts back at FCC
Previous thread: PTC labels MTV as smut peddlers
(827 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
What if they tried to have a debate and only two candidates came? Well, silly, obviously you find *other* ways to use your precious air time! I especially enjoyed the final paragraph. Read on, from Business Wire via Google (home.businesswire.com)...
The W - Current Events & Politics - WWE/Canadian Gov't Present Annoying PSAsRegister and log in to post!

The W™ message board

ZimBoard
©2001-2014 Brothers Zim

This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.134 seconds.