The W
Views: 97616472
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Calendar | Color chart | Log in for more!
23.7.14 1931
The W - Pro Wrestling - WWE Backlash 2009 Q'n'D Results (Page 2)
This thread has 8 referrals leading to it
Register and log in to post!
Thread rated: 5.13
Pages: Prev 1 2
(2676 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (24 total)
spf
Scrapple








Since: 2.1.02
From: The Las Vegas of Canada

Since last post: 12 days
Last activity: 6 hours
AIM:  
#21 Posted on | Instant Rating: 5.16
    Originally posted by Matt Tracker
      Originally posted by kentish
      Totally agree. I'm not crazy about Punk, but this was the worst pay possible to begin his second go round with the briefcase. It could only be worse if he actually lost the briefcase. I would love to know what idiot thought it was a good idea to job him to Kane last night.


    Kane was losing credibility as a contender, and his win polished his recent reputation. He hasn't won a big match in a long time, and Punk retains the briefcase while losing no stature. Punk has beaten Kane regularly for a while now; he cleanly pinned him in house shows two months ago Click Here (The W).

I believe one of CRZ's rules was "If it didn't happen on tv, it didn't happen."



2007 and 2008 W-League Fantasy Football champion!
Matt Tracker
Scrapple








Since: 8.5.03
From: North Carolina

Since last post: 1 day
Last activity: 57 min.
#22 Posted on | Instant Rating: 6.75
    Originally posted by spf
    I believe one of CRZ's rules was "If it didn't happen on tv, it didn't happen."


Punk beat Kane on Monday, and I wanna say he beat Kane during his title reign.

Punk is a seriously established upper-card guy now. A rare singles loss will not dilute his appeal.

(edited by Matt Tracker on 27.4.09 1412)


"To be the man, you gotta beat demands." -- The Lovely Mrs. Tracker
kentish
Andouille








Since: 19.8.05
From: My Old Kentucky Home

Since last post: 3 days
Last activity: 1 day
#23 Posted on | Instant Rating: 4.64
    Originally posted by Matt Tracker
      Originally posted by spf
      I believe one of CRZ's rules was "If it didn't happen on tv, it didn't happen."


    Punk is a seriously established upper-card guy now. A rare singles loss will not dilute his appeal.

    (edited by Matt Tracker on 27.4.09 1412)

I agree that a rare singles loss won't hurt a guy. But I don't believe Punk's losses are rare by any means.

Who would actually buy Kane as a serious threat these days? He hasn't held the belt since 1998, and that was for one day. He has been used horribly most of this decade, and is way past his prime IMO. I don't care that much for Punk, but at least he is a fresh face that hasn't totally been damaged at this point.




"I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ."

-- Mahatma Gandhi
oldschoolhero
Knackwurst








Since: 2.1.02
From: nWo Country

Since last post: 1895 days
Last activity: 1829 days
#24 Posted on | Instant Rating: 9.00
Let's be clear: losing to Kane isn't a deal breaker. Like Big Show, Kane is big enough to be the expected winner in most matches. A small guy like Punk losing to him is a lot less damaging than dropping a win against, say, Jericho or Orton. I just don't understand why they chose this specific point to do it.



"And here...we...go."
Pages: Prev 1 2
Thread rated: 5.13
Pages: Prev 1 2
Thread ahead: RAW #831 4/27/09
Next thread: Ring of Honor on HDNet #6 25.4.09
Previous thread: Backlash Predictions
(2676 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
Anyone know where and when it's gonna be? Or where I could check?
- asteroidboy, Dec. PPV? (2002)
Related threads: Backlash Predictions - Backlash Results - Backlash Predictions - More...
The W - Pro Wrestling - WWE Backlash 2009 Q'n'D Results (Page 2)Register and log in to post!

The W™ message board

ZimBoard
©2001-2014 Brothers Zim

This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.356 seconds.