The W
Views: 98551748
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Calendar | Color chart | Log in for more!
30.8.14 1932
The W - Current Events & Politics - WTC Building 7
This thread has 6 referrals leading to it
Register and log in to post!
Thread rated: 4.57
Pages: 1
(108 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (5 total)
dwaters
Lap cheong








Since: 16.10.02
From: Connecticut

Since last post: 11 hours
Last activity: 11 hours
#1 Posted on | Instant Rating: 3.45
i don't know if people are sick of the 9/11 conspiracy theorists, but this only about one specific aspect of it:
Building 7.

I saw an ad for a website on a NY TV station and looked at it. I'm still not sure what their ultimate goal* or implication is, but they do raise some questions....

www.buildingwhat.com

Any thoughts?

*Edit--seems they want an investigation, but I'm not sure why at this point or what it might accomplish.

(edited by dwaters on 15.12.10 1305)
Promote this thread!
Matt Tracker
Scrapple








Since: 8.5.03
From: North Carolina

Since last post: 4 days
Last activity: 1 day
#2 Posted on | Instant Rating: 7.32
Given that the building is across the street from the obliteration of two skyscrapers, it would have to suffer some structural damage, right? Look at the smoke coming out of it before it tumbles.

As far as conspiracy theories go, I'm incredulous. Someone would have stepped forward with the biggest story of this century if not -- pardon the possible hyperbole -- the history of the country. A plot of this scale would have to involve too many people for everyone to remain silent.

Forget Wikileaks. This would be the intelligence disclosure that would garner global response.



"To be the man, you gotta beat demands." -- The Lovely Mrs. Tracker
ges7184
Lap cheong








Since: 7.1.02
From: Birmingham, AL

Since last post: 118 days
Last activity: 41 days
#3 Posted on | Instant Rating: 5.95
Has any of these conspiracy theorists ever put forth a theory of why the destruction of building 7 would even be necessary? What gets accomplished by knocking this particular building down that doesn't get accomplished by knocking down the first two?



The Bored are already here. Idle hands are the devil's workshop. And no... we won't kill dolphins. But koalas are fair game.
Von Maestro
Boudin rouge








Since: 6.1.04
From: New York

Since last post: 171 days
Last activity: 8 days
#4 Posted on | Instant Rating: 4.54
    Originally posted by dwaters
    i don't know if people are sick of the 9/11 conspiracy theorists


They are. Someone please inform Jesse Ventura of this as well.
lotjx
Scrapple








Since: 5.9.08

Since last post: 1 day
Last activity: 7 hours
#5 Posted on | Instant Rating: 1.60
As a fan of conspiracies, I have no idea why this is so important. The only conclusion, I can come up with is it falls into the USA allowed 9/11 conspiracy. That theory is they pre-set the towers to explode. The planes don't crash the way they want them or thought they would yet Building 7 is wired, so it goes down thanks to a pre-timed bomb or someone activating it by mistake. To me, it looks like what Matt said, it took damage probably from the surrounding debris and built in way not to take that amount of damage.

I don't like the 9/11 USA planned the entire thing. Besides the chilling thought that the government thinks we are their play things, too many intangibles would be needed to go forwarded with it. I also don't think people who work in the Pentagon or know people in the Pentagon would allow that attack to happen plus that was the major F-U from Al Queda to the military. Did the government allow 9-11 to happen, I am on the fence about that. There were too many documents and reports stating the FBI knew those guys were up to something. Even when the guy who is training the pilots called the FBI, it got swept under the rug. Either the FBI was incompetent or someone thought this was a win win for the Bush administration and the military. Bush gets re-elected and the military gets a giant pile of cash. I tend to believe the incompetent theory considering how every thing Bush touched turned to shit mainly due to overconfidence and stupidity. Yet, he did get a second term while having worse numbers then most Presidents during that time and the military did get some phat loot.



(edited by lotjx on 16.12.10 0757)
Thread rated: 4.57
Pages: 1
Thread ahead: Your Time Person of the year is....
Next thread: Don't Ask Don't Tell is about to become history
Previous thread: Red/orange lights over DC
(108 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
At what point does parental responsibility take over? Hell, even if there were no opportunites to sell games or movies to teenagers, they'd still see them or something like them. Parents raise their kids poorly all of the time.
The W - Current Events & Politics - WTC Building 7 Register and log in to post!

The W™ message board

ZimBoard
©2001-2014 Brothers Zim

This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.097 seconds.