i still don't think the canes were given enough credit for how well they played and the teams they were able to beat...incidentally, great article (http://espn.go.com//nhl/playoffs2002/s/hradek0610.html)by e.j. hradek on espn how the canes have absolutely no chance to beat the wings in game 5. i mean, there is absolutely nothing informative/interesting/insightful in it, especially considering it's from a guy who picked the wings to lose in the first round. what an idiot.
(edited by quagmire on 12.6.02 2351) Marge: Mr. Scorpio, this house is almost too good for us. I keep expecting to get the bums rush. Scorpio: We don't have bums in our town, Marge, and if we did, they wouldn't rush, they'd be allowed to go at their own pace.
Yeah, Hasek has a lot of Vezinas (even though he didn't deserve it in the 96-97 season. That should have gone to Martin Brodeur (67 GP, 37-14-13 record, NHL leading GAA of 1.88, and a save % of 0.927) BRODEUR WAS FARKING ROBBED)