The W
Views: 95691206
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Calendar | Color chart | Log in for more!
20.4.14 1347
The W - CRZ's World - WIENER RATINGS OF THE DAY
This thread has 6 referrals leading to it
Register and log in to post!
Thread rated: 5.95
Pages: 1 2 Next
(1198 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (38 total)
CRZ
Big Brother
Administrator








Since: 9.12.01
From: ミネアポリス

Since last post: 18 hours
Last activity: 11 hours
AIM:  
ICQ:  
Y!:
#1 Posted on | Instant Rating: 8.65
Combining the two most recent threads of Site Feedback, here now is a list of the ratings I've given. Again, like all threads in here, an easy and cheap way to inflate your post count is to add your own giant list and ensure that everyone's good and bored by the bottom of the page.

Votes from CRZ:

10 for (username removed)
10 for (username removed)
10 for (username removed)
10 for (username removed)
10 for (username removed)
10 for (username removed)
10 for (username removed)
10 for (username removed)
10 for (username removed)
10 for (username removed)
10 for (username removed)
10 for (username removed)
10 for (username removed)
10 for (username removed)
10 for (username removed)
10 for (username removed)
10 for (username removed)
9 for (username removed)
9 for (username removed)
9 for (username removed)
9 for (username removed)
9 for (username removed)
9 for (username removed)
9 for (username removed)
9 for (username removed)
9 for (username removed)
9 for (username removed)
9 for (username removed)
9 for (username removed)
9 for (username removed)
9 for (username removed)
9 for (username removed)
9 for (username removed)
9 for (username removed)
8 for (username removed)
8 for (username removed)
8 for (username removed)
8 for (username removed)
8 for (username removed)
8 for (username removed)
8 for (username removed)
8 for (username removed)
8 for (username removed)
8 for (username removed)
8 for (username removed)
8 for (username removed)
8 for (username removed)
8 for (username removed)
8 for (username removed)
8 for (username removed)
8 for (username removed)
8 for (username removed)
8 for (username removed)
8 for (username removed)
8 for (username removed)
8 for (username removed)
8 for (username removed)
8 for (username removed)
8 for (username removed)
8 for (username removed)
8 for (username removed)
8 for (username removed)
8 for (username removed)
8 for (username removed)
8 for (username removed)
8 for (username removed)
8 for (username removed)
8 for (username removed)
8 for (username removed)
8 for (username removed)
7 for (username removed)
7 for (username removed)
7 for (username removed)
7 for (username removed)
7 for (username removed)
7 for (username removed)
7 for (username removed)
7 for (username removed)
7 for (username removed)
7 for (username removed)
7 for (username removed)
7 for (username removed)
7 for (username removed)
7 for (username removed)
7 for (username removed)
7 for (username removed)
7 for (username removed)
7 for (username removed)
7 for (username removed)
7 for (username removed)
7 for (username removed)
7 for (username removed)
7 for (username removed)
7 for (username removed)
6 for (username removed)
6 for (username removed)
6 for (username removed)
6 for (username removed)
6 for (username removed)
6 for (username removed)
6 for (username removed)
6 for (username removed)
6 for (username removed)
6 for (username removed)
6 for (username removed)
6 for (username removed)
6 for (username removed)
6 for (username removed)
6 for (username removed)
6 for (username removed)
6 for (username removed)
6 for (username removed)
6 for (username removed)
5 for (username removed)
5 for (username removed)
5 for (username removed)
5 for (username removed)
5 for (username removed)
5 for (username removed)
5 for (username removed)
5 for (username removed)
5 for (username removed)
5 for (username removed)
5 for (username removed)
5 for (username removed)
5 for (username removed)
5 for (username removed)
5 for (username removed)
5 for (username removed)
4 for (username removed)
4 for (username removed)
4 for (username removed)
4 for (username removed)
4 for (username removed)
4 for (username removed)
4 for (username removed)
4 for (username removed)
4 for (username removed)
4 for (username removed)
4 for (username removed)
4 for (username removed)
4 for (username removed)
4 for (username removed)
4 for (username removed)
4 for (username removed)
4 for (username removed)
3 for (username removed)
3 for (username removed)
3 for (username removed)
3 for (username removed)
3 for (username removed)
3 for (username removed)
3 for (username removed)
3 for (username removed)
3 for (username removed)
3 for (username removed)
3 for (username removed)
3 for (username removed)
3 for (username removed)
3 for (username removed)
3 for (username removed)
3 for (username removed)
3 for (username removed)
3 for (username removed)
3 for (username removed)
2 for (username removed)
2 for (username removed)
2 for (username removed)
2 for (username removed)
2 for (username removed)
2 for (username removed)
2 for (username removed)
2 for (username removed)
2 for (username removed)
2 for (username removed)
2 for (username removed)
2 for (username removed)
1 for (username removed)
1 for (username removed)
1 for (username removed)
1 for (username removed)
1 for (username removed)
1 for (username removed)
1 for (username removed)
1 for (username removed)
1 for (username removed)
1 for (username removed)
1 for (username removed)
1 for (username removed)
1 for (username removed)
1 for (username removed)
1 for (username removed)
1 for (username removed)
1 for (username removed)
0 for (username removed)
0 for (username removed)
0 for (username removed)
0 for (username removed)
0 for (username removed)
0 for (username removed)
0 for (username removed)
0 for (username removed)
0 for (username removed)
0 for (username removed)
0 for (username removed)
0 for (username removed)
0 for (username removed)
0 for (username removed)

Here it is again, a bit easier, thanks to a "| uniq -c":

17 10 for (username removed)
17 9 for (username removed)
36 8 for (username removed)
24 7 for (username removed)
19 6 for (username removed)
16 5 for (username removed)
17 4 for (username removed)
19 3 for (username removed)
12 2 for (username removed)
17 1 for (username removed)
14 0 for (username removed)

I don't know if that tells you if I LIKE anybody or not, but there you go.

YOUR link to a list of votes should be somewhere on your Profile page - look for "view Your ratings"



CRZ
Promote this thread!
Jaguar
Knackwurst








Since: 23.1.02
From: Phoenix, AZ

Since last post: 13 days
Last activity: 13 days
#2 Posted on | Instant Rating: 6.07
My ratings are as follows:

10's = 4
9's = 2
8's = 16
7's = 26
6's = 32
5's = 36
4's = 4
3's = 8
2's = 2
1's = 3
0's = 14

The reasoning behind this breakdown:

1) I'm not very concerned with ratings, so I don't usually bother with them unless it's someone who I really dislike and I think they should know it, or it's someone I like and I feel they should be rated higher.

2) This is an interesting dilemma: If I see someone I like and their rating is currently a 7-something but I really don't feel they belong with the level of people I rated a 7, then I won't rate them. Why? So I don't drag their rating down. Same goes for someone whom I personally think deserves a 1 or a 2, but I won't rate them if it boosts their rating and makes them think someone actually LIKES them.

3) 0's are mainly reserved for people I view as trolls. As a matter of fact, many of the people I've given 0's to are also on my ignore list, and several of them have been banned or unregistered. If you suck, or I just don't like you, you'll probably end up somewhere between a 1 and a 4 depending on how well written and thought out your posts are.

4) I am ambivalent about a lot of you. However, I did go on a ratings spree for a week, and gave out a lot of 5's to people whose ratings were lower than I thought they should be, which seems to have a direct relation to posting in the wrestling forum.

5) I'm sure I'd rate at least another hundred people < 5 if I read the Wrestling forum more often. As it is, I think Site Bashing lets me frolic with enough dumbasses as it is.

6) Pieman got an 8. Dean got a 10. Maybe Pieman should write a column. Also, I'm sure Brewguy would move up a spot if he posted more.

7) The Zims have not been rated. Unless you count Assclown.

Well, that's all I can think of that might be semi-interesting.

-Jag

Of course, I'd find it really interesting to find the identity of the one person that is ignoring me.



Wake lost. I am a sad panda.

The Bad Boys of Punctuation

Add liberally to any post for best results
ScreamingHeadGuy
Frankfurter








Since: 1.2.02
From: Appleton, WI

Since last post: 563 days
Last activity: 563 days
#3 Posted on | Instant Rating: 6.42
10-0
9-3
8-2
7-6
6-8
5-4
4-2
3-2
2-3
1-2
0-12

Now that I look at the list, I realize that half of the posters I gave "0"s are no longer posting (at least I haven't read from them lately). I also realize that I should re-rate some people up (in fact, almost everyone I have rated should probably be higher).

Most people that I don't read on a regular basis don't get rated. And even some people that I DO read on a regular basis don't get rated (actually, MOST people I read don't get rated - hmm).

I don't give out "10"s for the simple reason that nobody I have read is perfect (I guess I wouldn't make a good teacher, eh?).

Maybe we could all make charts and graphs of number of people vs. ratings we've given them. Then we can all have charts and graphs and, best of all, long lists with lots of names.

Of course, for even discussing ratings, we can now all expect ours to drop by a few points (jinx).



I was Wiener of the Day.
Once.
A long time ago.
Really.

Gugs
Bierwurst








Since: 9.7.02
From: Sleep (That's where I'm a viking)

Since last post: 332 days
Last activity: 2 hours
AIM:  
Y!:
#4 Posted on | Instant Rating: 5.39
10: 27
9: 1
8: 1
7-1: 0
0: 14

Yay, rash decisions! These 10's are for people I agree with, people I'm sucking up too, or people with hot user pics. I'm that shallow. The 0's are my way of saying "Fuck you, you don't count, I'm ignoring you now."



What are you, some sort of critic?
Torchslasher
Knackwurst








Since: 17.1.02
From: New F'n Jersey

Since last post: 193 days
Last activity: 160 days
#5 Posted on | Instant Rating: 5.75
Breakin' it down:

10- 3 peeps
9- 10
8- 10
7- 8
6- 4
5- 8
4 through 1- 7
0- 12 Wieners

I think that I am way too nice to some people, and some of the 5-7's are for either people I thought are too low ratings-wise, or whose political views are closer to mine (although I'm still smart enough to usually stay out of the Politics folder).

I will say that one of my ten ratings is for the Wiener I think comes up with the consistently funniest posts. The second one is for the poster with the biggest cajones on the board. And the third is Dr. Unlikely. Come on, you know he deserves his props (even if he only posts if there is a good 24 thread).



Behold the scary undead powers of WESTERN-TAKER!
EddieBurkett
Boudin blanc








Since: 3.1.02
From: GA in person, NJ in heart

Since last post: 4 days
Last activity: 33 min.
#6 Posted on | Instant Rating: 7.14
10's: 3. One because I'm nuts. One because even that vote won't help what I expect to be his poor rating. One because that guy is kewl!!!1
9's: 11. One of those is Reva Renee Renz.
8's: 15.
7's: 25.
6's: 13.
5's: 6.
4's: 3. One of them just because.
3's: 8.
2's: 11.
1's: 11.
0's: 19.

Pretty much, if I like what you tend to say, you're in the 6 - 8 range. If you do something awesome you'll get bumped up to 9. 0 is for trolls. 1 is for trolls in sheep's clothing. 2 - 3 is if you try to make legitimate posts and come off like a troll. 4-5 means I agree with you, but you tend troll-like.

When I first started assigning ratings I would read a post and then assign a rating based on certain characteristics (you got 1 point for proper spelling and grammar, 1 point if I agreed with you, 1-2 points depending on the length of the post, etc.) That got to be too much work so I dropped the metric and went more arbitrary, as evidenced above.




"Yeah, angles in the ring... someone thought of that a long time ago. They called it pro wrestling." -- the MCS

"I think mentally maybe I've just reached puberty." -- Vince McMahon (hollywoodreporter.com)

"How many poles did you get?"
"I got just enough for . . . ninja!"
OlFuzzyBastard
Knackwurst








Since: 28.4.02
From: Pittsburgh, PA

Since last post: 14 days
Last activity: 18 min.
AIM:  
#7 Posted on | Instant Rating: 5.70
I tend to only rate people when I have an actual opinion of them - and I tend to drop them way down when they annoy me. In fact, looking at this, I really need to fix a few of these because I have a few that are unnecessarily low.

And, as is typical, most of those zeroes are long-since banned.

10: 3
9: 8
8: 5
7: 2
6: 1
5: 1
4: 0
3: 1
2: 6
1: 2
0: 11



"The Republican National Committee announced today that the Republican Party is changing its emblem from an elephant to a condom. The Republican committee chairman explained that the condom more clearly reflects the party's stance today, because a condom accepts inflation, halts production, precludes a next generation, protects a bunch of pricks, and offers a sense of security while you're actually getting screwed."
pieman
As young as
he feels








Since: 11.12.01
From: China, Maine

Since last post: 2 days
Last activity: 2 days
AIM:  
ICQ:  
Y!:
#8 Posted on | Instant Rating: 8.21

    Originally posted by Jaguar
    Maybe Pieman should write a column.


I did once write a review of some Orbital tapes I got from someone out west. I think that's how I got the contributor tag over there. I was asked last week why I have the contributor tag since I don't seem to actually contribute any content to the Guest Column folder. I don't have tons of time to write much nowadays, but am open to suggestion on what I should write about, Jag.




Gabba Gabba Hey!


Bullitt
Shot in the dark








Since: 11.1.02
From: Houston

Since last post: 338 days
Last activity: 5 days
#9 Posted on | Instant Rating: 7.25
Don't listen to him, pieman...you're a 10 in my books.

I'm an all-or-nothing guy, so it's 10s and 0s for those I've rated.



Making it Happen Since 1971 (agentzero.blogspot.com)
redsoxnation
Scrapple








Since: 24.7.02

Since last post: 293 days
Last activity: 293 days
#10 Posted on | Instant Rating: 5.65
10s: 12
9s: 17
8s: 19
7s: 14
6s: 5
5s: 7
4s: 2
3s: 2
2s: 3
1s: 6
0s: 88



Looking at it, I might have to change a few of the 0's, but generally they are people who don't post here any longer, were spammers/hackers/annoyances and were banned, or posted once or twice and made no sense but weren't banned.

(edited by redsoxnation on 31.3.04 2249)

(edited by redsoxnation on 31.3.04 2252)

Why is TVLand stealing my ideas from DEAN's Workrate Report's? They had to be stealing, as I thought I had the only demented mind that could put Bea Arthur and Abe Vigoda in a sex scene.
Keeper
Italian
Moderator








Since: 1.3.02
From: Worcester, MA

Since last post: 203 days
Last activity: 2 days
#11 Posted on | Instant Rating: 8.62
I am more a "reward good posters/columnists" kind of guy, then a "This post stinks... here is an 0". Anyway here is the breakdown:

10 - 4
9 - 4
8 - 8
7 - 6
6 - 4
5 - 1
2 - 1
0 - 1 (and he's been banned)

After reading this thread, maybe I should rate more people.

(edited by Keeper on 31.3.04 2351)

Murphy's Law "The odds of the bread landing buttered side down are directly proportional to the price of the carpet."
Super Shane Spear
Bierwurst








Since: 2.1.02
From: Sector 7 Slums

Since last post: 1405 days
Last activity: 1405 days
#12 Posted on | Instant Rating: 3.08
10s: 8
9s: 5
8s: 2
7s: 2
6s: 0
5s: 3
4s: 2
3s: 1
2s: 1
1s: 4
0s: 6

I think the only true 0 is TiO. The rest are from one day when I decided to go headhunting anybody who mysteriously had a ten rating while only posting once.



THIS SPACE FOR RENT.

TO INQUIRE, PLEASE MESSAGE FOR GOING RATES.

WE'VE GOT A PEPPER BAR.
Karlos the Jackal
Lap cheong








Since: 2.1.02
From: The City of Subdued Excitement

Since last post: 77 days
Last activity: 10 hours
#13 Posted on | Instant Rating: 8.00
I don't rate people all that often, or even post much. I read a lot, though.

Some people I've rated higher than I would if I were "in a vacuum" just because I think they're rated way lower than they deserve (and even in pity cases, I probably won't go over 5). I also tend to rate people higher if they like NWA TNA.

My only real rule is that I don't rate people based on their political opinions, unless they drag it out of the political forum and are, also, fuckwitted.

9s: 3
8s: 14
7s: 5
6s: 3
5s: 3
4s: 2
3s: 2
2s: 2
1s: 3
0s: 6

I'm somehow reluctant to give out 10s, I see. I guess I'm saving it for a special occasion. Eh, I should probably bump a few people up.

Most of the lower-rated folks, I have no idea who they are anymore.

I would probably rate more people if I used "full graphics" mode, both for/against sigs and pics, and also 'cause it'd be easier to remember who everyone is.

--K

(edited by Karlos the Jackal on 1.4.04 0350)
PhilRippa
Chourico








Since: 4.1.02
From: Fairfax, VA

Since last post: 1767 days
Last activity: 372 days
#14 Posted on | Instant Rating: 8.13
I have handed out a grand total of three ratings... all of them 10s.

And two of those folks have already posted in this thread.

Phil



Hate World, Revenge Soon
DVDVR.com
Mike Sweetser
Boerewors








Since: 2.1.02
From: Seattle, Washington

Since last post: 2898 days
Last activity: 2790 days
AIM:  
#15 Posted on | Instant Rating: 5.58
I've given 10s to Z and G-Money, because I know where the power lies, brah.

If I ever want to get a massive civil war going, I'll put ratings in place over on the DVDVR board

Mike
dunkndollaz
Banger








Since: 3.1.02
From: Northern NJ

Since last post: 4 days
Last activity: 2 days
#16 Posted on | Instant Rating: 6.64
A total of 10 ratings - half of them are 8's the rest are 6,5,3,1 and 0



5 Time 5 Time 5 Time 5 Time 5 Time Wiener of the Day Runner-up
dMr
Andouille








Since: 2.11.02
From: Edinburgh, Scotland

Since last post: 12 days
Last activity: 4 min.
#17 Posted on | Instant Rating: 4.95
I had no idea rating was so over.

I've only bothered to give out 2 ratings (a 9 and a 7 seeing as you ask) and for the life of me I can't remember upon what basis I came up with the numbers. I'm sure both were entirely merited however.
JayJayDean
Scrapple








Since: 2.1.02
From: Seattle, WA

Since last post: 8 days
Last activity: 36 min.
AIM:  
Y!:
#18 Posted on | Instant Rating: 6.99
I hand out mostly zeroes as a public service to those who have set a rating threshold for ignoring people.



To get ass, youve got to bring ass." -- Roy Jones Jr.

"Your input has been noted.
I hope you don't take it personally if I disregard it."
-- Guru Zim

"Speak English or face admin retribution." -- CRZ
Sec19Row53
Lap cheong








Since: 2.1.02
From: Oconomowoc, WI

Since last post: 6 days
Last activity: 23 hours
Y!:
#19 Posted on | Instant Rating: 7.35
This thread causes me to ask a question that I've long wondered -- Do you WANT us to rate users? I've used the ratings system in the same way as JayJayDean, in that I toss around zeroes to those people that I think need to be gone. I generally follow that rating up with an "ignore". I just checked my ratings, and was only marginally surprised to see that I had rated only one person with something other than zero.

Since it's your board, I've figured that your ratings were really all that mattered. I don't rate more than "zeroes" because there are enough parts to the board that I don't frequent (Wrestling, Politics, KZIM, Basketball) that I don't feel qualified to rate most users.

Feedback is welcomed.



[It's where I sit]
CRZ
Big Brother
Administrator








Since: 9.12.01
From: ミネアポリス

Since last post: 18 hours
Last activity: 11 hours
AIM:  
ICQ:  
Y!:
#20 Posted on | Instant Rating: 8.65
    Originally posted by Sec19Row53
    This thread causes me to ask a question that I've long wondered -- Do you WANT us to rate users?
Of course I do! It does me no good to create features that nobody uses (even if I do that ALL the time). I should add that I much prefer people hand out ALL eleven ratings as opposed to just tens and zeroes, otherwise it's an even more useless gauge than it already is...



CRZ
Pages: 1 2 Next
Thread rated: 5.95
Pages: 1 2 Next
Thread ahead: TIE OF THE DAY: 040413
Next thread: TIE OF THE DAY: 040412
Previous thread: TIE OF THE DAY: 040407
(1198 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
"True" by Spandau Ballet "The Power of Love" by Huey Lewis & The News "Tenderness" by General Public
The W - CRZ's World - WIENER RATINGS OF THE DAYRegister and log in to post!

The W™ message board

ZimBoard
©2001-2014 Brothers Zim

This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.116 seconds.