The W
Views: 117193858
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Calendar | Color chart | Log in for more!
24.10.16 2226
The W - Pro Wrestling - Why was Taker upset? Register and log in to post!
Pages: 1(14267 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
Post (5 total)

Since: 17.3.02

Since last post: 3108 days
Last activity: 3084 days
#1 Posted on
I seem to recall the Undertaker specifically saying that he wanted Flair to draft him. So Flair drafts him. And now he's supposed to be pissed about it? Could someone explain the logic of that to me?
Promote this thread!
Mike Sweetser

Since: 2.1.02
From: Seattle, Washington

Since last post: 3816 days
Last activity: 3708 days
#2 Posted on
He was bullshitting Flair when he said it.



Since: 6.1.02
From: Pittsburgh, PA

Since last post: 7 days
Last activity: 2 hours
#3 Posted on
If you pay attention to the show, then you would get the answer. Undertaker goes to Vince and says "you told me that if i insisted Flair pick me, that he won't pick me"

So Undertaker was doing it so that Flair would NOT pick him, so that way Vince could get The Rock on the first pick and still get Undertaker later.

Lance's Response:


Since: 17.3.02

Since last post: 3108 days
Last activity: 3084 days
#4 Posted on
Ah, okay. I actually missed the show tonight due to work, so I had to read the WWF recap of it. They didn't mention what Taker said to Vince in their recap, so I didn't know that what he said last week was an attempt at reverse psychology. Thanks for clearing it up.
The Goon

Since: 2.1.02
From: Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Since last post: 10 days
Last activity: 11 hours
#5 Posted on
The old "reverse psychology" trick backfires on Bubba Red!
Pages: 1Thread ahead: Thoughts about the impending "Brand War"
Next thread: The Means To Make Amends
Previous thread: The WWF's missed opportunity
(14267 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
You're absolutely right. He looks retarded. Literally.
The W - Pro Wrestling - Why was Taker upset?Register and log in to post!

The W™ message board

©2001-2016 Brothers Zim

This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.461 seconds.