The W
Views: 95563940
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Calendar | Color chart | Log in for more!
17.4.14 0209
The W - Banished - who thinks the undertaker should go on the same show as kane
This thread has 8 referrals leading to it
Register and log in to post!
Thread rated: 2.98
Pages: 1
(386 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (16 total)
geckoman
Braunschweiger








Since: 25.3.04
From: Sanford, Michigan

Since last post: 3673 days
Last activity: 3648 days
#1 Posted on | Instant Rating: 0.03
I think the undertaker should go on the same show as kane cause it would probably make the show a lot better.



Geckoman
Promote this thread!
svt4real
Cotto








Since: 24.3.04
From: kc,mo

Since last post: 3571 days
Last activity: 3570 days
AIM:  
#2 Posted on | Instant Rating: 0.05
leave it the way it is and have 1 run in every once in a while on the other show.. I think it would get old quick (like evolution) if they where on the same show.. IMO

then in a few months have them tag up again!!!!!!



thebadguy
Chipolata








Since: 21.2.04
From: Rotherham,England

Since last post: 3187 days
Last activity: 2889 days
#3 Posted on | Instant Rating: 0.12
    Originally posted by svt4real
    leave it the way it is and have 1 run in every once in a while on the other show.. I think it would get old quick (like evolution) if they where on the same show.. IMO

    then in a few months have them tag up again!!!!!!


The sad thing is that this will probably come true.



This post has been paid for by the friends and supporters of The Bad Guy

1 time Wiener Of The Day!
Joseph412
Chaurice








Since: 3.10.03

Since last post: 3660 days
Last activity: 2225 days
#4 Posted on
oh great. maybe wwe can bring back kronik and renew that classic feud.
feetontheropes
Chaurice








Since: 25.3.04
From: Scotland

Since last post: 3662 days
Last activity: 3662 days
#5 Posted on
Heh Heh Kronik now that was bad

I'd say they should only be on the same show if Kane was going to win a rematch- but fat chance of that. Still, I'm not going to be sick of the deadman for a while yet.
JrBernal83
Cotto








Since: 26.8.03
From: Sussex, WI

Since last post: 3569 days
Last activity: 3558 days
#6 Posted on | Instant Rating: 2.33
I Really think that the Undertaker has to hang it up, or atleast let others shine. Him coming back as the Deadman was cool, but it wasnt worth all of the hype they made it out to be. He still looks the same as the Bad Ass. Its true that some of the older guys dont know how to Hang it up (Hogan,HBK,Flair,taker,Nash,VINCE!) all but Nash and HBK are over 50, with nash almost 50 and hbk almost 40. Some guys need to learn how to retire. You dont see Snuka jumping into a main event?

(edited by JrBernal83 on 25.3.04 1837)


"You Suck, Its True, Its True

You are Matt Hardy
You are Matt Hardy


Which WWE Wrestler are you?
brought to you by Quizilla
AssDroid!
Pinkelwurst








Since: 6.1.03
From: The Jersey Shore

Since last post: 3550 days
Last activity: 3547 days
#7 Posted on | Instant Rating: 3.00
I don't think Undertaker is over 50.

Otherwise, I agree, some of those guys need to retire. I don't think HBK really needs to. He's been showing that he can still hang with the guys and even carry some of the lesser guys to decent matches. He may not be what he was eight years ago, but he's still one of the most talented guys on the roster.



Flim Springfield.
Hoodle
Bauerwurst








Since: 19.12.03

Since last post: 3175 days
Last activity: 3170 days
#8 Posted on | Instant Rating: 7.18
Taker is still a very, very agile and believable wrestler. He's got years left in him, if he wants them, as far as I'm concerned - esp. if he's gonna work a lighter schedule like he has been lately. (No UT on smackdown tonight? Nor last week . . . )

Nash did hang em up - he's done, as far as I know.

Flair can still hang - he's not as great as he used to be, but still worth having around for an occasional match.

HBK is almost every bit as good as he used to be. His body ain't quite the same - but it's close. His inring performances are still STELLAR. HBK, even now, is one of the greatest on the entire WWE roster. I hope Shawn sticks around for a few more years. HBK matches have always been just a little more special than your average "great match."



(edited by Hoodle on 25.3.04 2032)
Tyler Durden
Frankfurter








Since: 22.2.04
From: Frankfurt, Germany

Since last post: 4 days
Last activity: 9 hours
#9 Posted on | Instant Rating: 1.11
    Originally posted by geckoman
    I think the undertaker should go on the same show as kane cause it would probably make the show a lot better.



WHY would THAT make SmackDown a lot better??









The first rule of Fight Club is:

You dont talk about Fight Club!


The second rule of Fight Club is:

You dont talk about Fight Club!
Spaceman Spiff
Knackwurst








Since: 2.1.02
From: Philly Suburbs

Since last post: 2 days
Last activity: 3 hours
AIM:  
#10 Posted on | Instant Rating: 4.05
Because Taker going to Raw means that midcard heels don't have to worry about getting squashed by Taker when/if they get over.

(edited by Spaceman Spiff on 26.3.04 1207)


ScottLadd
Chipolata








Since: 23.1.04
From: Douglas, Isle Of Man

Since last post: 3422 days
Last activity: 3311 days
AIM:  
#11 Posted on | Instant Rating: 2.22
Leave Undertaker on Smackdown. He can feud with guys like Bradshaw & Bob Holly. No-one would give a ratsass if they had to job to him. Well me not anyhoo. There is also ways for him to feud with others in time like Cena or Eddie again. Or feud with Shane McMahon and see if he ruins Undertaker like he did Kane on RAW with that feud he had. He could also fued with Big Show but on RAW he'd only have HHH or A-Train or Batista and all three have big downsizes. Kane needs to be kept from Undertaker otherwise it gets real boring faster.
darkmatcher
Bockwurst








Since: 12.2.03
From: New York, USA

Since last post: 2487 days
Last activity: 1562 days
#12 Posted on | Instant Rating: 5.26
Great post Hoodle, why should HBK have to retire? He still outworks more than 80% of the WWE roster and like 90% of the Raw roster. More workrate is a good thing, besides, is nearing-40 really all that old? Benoit, Booker T and Eddie are only about two years younger than him, should they think about hanging it up?
Bret Hart (who is retired) went past 40 and he was really doing fine until that head injury.
Nash is pretty much retired, but 44 is as 'almost 50' as 14 is almost 20. Flair still outworks more than half the roster, which is more a sad commentary about the roster than anything but he's still doing fine aside from his lame-ass Evolution's bitch boy character. Should Rico(age 42) retire too? He only started a few years ago. Snuka no longer wrestles because he CAN'T.

Basically, if you can still go that why retire? This age prejudice is useless, as the young guys can learn a lot from the older guys and I'd take HBK, Flair and Undertaker over Randy Orton, Rene Dupree and Garrison Cade any day. And I mean, going over them in matches too, until those tools actually do something worthwhile.

Edit: Booker T is actually the same age as Michaels.

(edited by darkmatcher on 26.3.04 1435)
Jonny_English
Mettwurst








Since: 18.3.04
From: Derby, UK

Since last post: 2663 days
Last activity: 2486 days
#13 Posted on | Instant Rating: 0.00
14 is almost 20....

....that must be how Rob Feinstein got 'confused'...
amar
Chaurice








Since: 29.3.04
From: bloomfield, ct.

Since last post: 3670 days
Last activity: 3663 days
#14 Posted on | Instant Rating: 0.00
(deleted by CRZ on 29.3.04 1832)
SC
Potato korv








Since: 11.12.01
From: Valparaiso, IN

Since last post: 1138 days
Last activity: 472 days
AIM:  
#15 Posted on | Instant Rating: 6.12
(deleted by CRZ on 29.3.04 1833)
CRZ
Big Brother
Administrator








Since: 9.12.01
From: ミネアポリス

Since last post: 8 hours
Last activity: 2 hours
AIM:  
ICQ:  
Y!:
#16 Posted on | Instant Rating: 8.65
    Originally posted by ScottieKStones
    You have made the same post four times, dude. Try to not.
Lost cause.



CRZ
Thread rated: 2.98
Pages: 1
Thread ahead: where are the spoilers?
Next thread: Triple H returns!
Previous thread: Heel Bradshaw, cena and haas
(386 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
Are you serious? There's a sticky thread at the very top of this forum which is pretty prominently displayed. Here's a link to this forum, so you can see I'm not kidding. And here's a link to that thread.
The W - Banished - who thinks the undertaker should go on the same show as kaneRegister and log in to post!

The W™ message board

ZimBoard
©2001-2014 Brothers Zim

This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.075 seconds.