The W
WrestleMania 33 begins in 394,342 seconds
Views: 121989798
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Calendar | Color chart | Log in for more!
29.3.17 0427
The W - Pro Wrestling - Whither MNM? (Page 2)
This thread has 15 referrals leading to it
Register and log in to post!
Thread rated: 4.88
Pages: Prev 1 2
(5498 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
Post (23 total)

Since: 1.5.03
From: Gainesville, FL.

Since last post: 3403 days
Last activity: 3390 days
#21 Posted on | Instant Rating: 3.67
With all due respect, Candice and Torrie have made the company more money than MANY other people on the show.
Like it or not, the divas move merch and seem to have to do a lot of functions.
MNM not being on the show is unfortunate, but I wouldn't go so far as to say that the divas don't deserve a WM payoff just as much as anyone in the company.

Since: 12.12.01
From: Pittsburgh, PA

Since last post: 26 days
Last activity: 17 hours
#22 Posted on | Instant Rating: 8.46
It's just a guess, but I'm betting they asked Stacy Keibler to do a tag with Torrie against Candice and Victoria but she said no. A tag with superstar Stacy would've been justification for two women's matches, but Torrie vs. Candice ... at least there's no Miller Lite Catfight Girls.

    The night before Mania, Lance Storm is going to compete in a match that will probably put everything on the card to shame or a joke in comparison.

Typically this is where I nitpick you but while I think they'll all be good, I really don't have the faith in the Smackdown match, Foley/Edge, or Money in the Bank to say they'll match the likely quality of a Danielson/Storm match. Here's hoping, but ehhhh. One thing's coming to an end this year and that's Shawn Michaels' streak of ****+ show-stealing WM matches.

Since: 19.1.06
From: ireland

Since last post: 4012 days
Last activity: 3983 days
#23 Posted on | Instant Rating: 3.82
I must admit that I am absolutely disgusted that MNM aren't on the card for Mania, they have carried a huge weight on the Smackdown card over the past few months, many feuds would never have gotten over if it wasn't for them. I think the WWE should have gone ahead and had a Mexicools vs. MNM at mania, the overall crowd reaction to that match (with or without prior heat) would have been great, I would love to see both of those teams go at it over the course of the next few months.

    Originally posted by Tribal Prophet
    You KNOW they won't be taking time away from the Triple H/Undertaker matches.

    Tribal Prophet

Thats a real pity though! My problem isn't with the time given to HHH or Taker, my problem is with the time they are giving to their opponents. Neither of whom should be in the position that they are in IMO.
And what is Taker's fascination with wrestling big guys at wrestlmania all about anyway? Giant Gonzales, Kane, Sid, Albert, Nash and so on..

If you want to know what more people in Ireland think of wrestling at the moment head over to the website in my profile. You never know you might find it interesting. You can advertise your website there in your own posts.
Pages: Prev 1 2
Thread rated: 4.88
Pages: Prev 1 2
Thread ahead: RAW #670 (3/27) Last RAW before Wrestlemania
Next thread: Rodney Mack on the virtue of "old school"...
Previous thread: Wear this, and die
(5498 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
Anybody here still watching TNA? It was quite an impressive show tonight, though I admit my opinion is skewed by the fact that I've recently become a huge Amazing Red fan (after seeing some of his matches in RoH, especially against Low Ki).
- TheCheat, NWA TNA 3/24 (2004)
Related threads: The WrestleMania XXII Preview Thread - A Garbage WrestleMania? - My on-line sportsbook is taking bets on the ME at WM22. - More...
The W - Pro Wrestling - Whither MNM? (Page 2)Register and log in to post!

The W™ message board

©2001-2017 Brothers Zim

This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.484 seconds.