The W
Views: 132038707
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Calendar | Color chart | Log in for more!
22.4.18 0951
The W - Pro Wrestling - Whither MNM? (Page 2)
This thread has 16 referrals leading to it
Register and log in to post!
Thread rated: 4.88
Pages: Prev 1 2
(5750 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
Post (23 total)

Since: 1.5.03
From: Gainesville, FL.

Since last post: 3792 days
Last activity: 3779 days
#21 Posted on | Instant Rating: 3.67
With all due respect, Candice and Torrie have made the company more money than MANY other people on the show.
Like it or not, the divas move merch and seem to have to do a lot of functions.
MNM not being on the show is unfortunate, but I wouldn't go so far as to say that the divas don't deserve a WM payoff just as much as anyone in the company.

Since: 12.12.01
From: Pittsburgh, PA

Since last post: 12 days
Last activity: 2 days
#22 Posted on | Instant Rating: 8.46
It's just a guess, but I'm betting they asked Stacy Keibler to do a tag with Torrie against Candice and Victoria but she said no. A tag with superstar Stacy would've been justification for two women's matches, but Torrie vs. Candice ... at least there's no Miller Lite Catfight Girls.

    The night before Mania, Lance Storm is going to compete in a match that will probably put everything on the card to shame or a joke in comparison.

Typically this is where I nitpick you but while I think they'll all be good, I really don't have the faith in the Smackdown match, Foley/Edge, or Money in the Bank to say they'll match the likely quality of a Danielson/Storm match. Here's hoping, but ehhhh. One thing's coming to an end this year and that's Shawn Michaels' streak of ****+ show-stealing WM matches.

Since: 19.1.06
From: ireland

Since last post: 4401 days
Last activity: 4373 days
#23 Posted on | Instant Rating: 3.82
I must admit that I am absolutely disgusted that MNM aren't on the card for Mania, they have carried a huge weight on the Smackdown card over the past few months, many feuds would never have gotten over if it wasn't for them. I think the WWE should have gone ahead and had a Mexicools vs. MNM at mania, the overall crowd reaction to that match (with or without prior heat) would have been great, I would love to see both of those teams go at it over the course of the next few months.

    Originally posted by Tribal Prophet
    You KNOW they won't be taking time away from the Triple H/Undertaker matches.

    Tribal Prophet

Thats a real pity though! My problem isn't with the time given to HHH or Taker, my problem is with the time they are giving to their opponents. Neither of whom should be in the position that they are in IMO.
And what is Taker's fascination with wrestling big guys at wrestlmania all about anyway? Giant Gonzales, Kane, Sid, Albert, Nash and so on..

If you want to know what more people in Ireland think of wrestling at the moment head over to the website in my profile. You never know you might find it interesting. You can advertise your website there in your own posts.
Pages: Prev 1 2
Thread rated: 4.88
Pages: Prev 1 2
Thread ahead: RAW #670 (3/27) Last RAW before Wrestlemania
Next thread: Rodney Mack on the virtue of "old school"...
Previous thread: Wear this, and die
(5750 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
Look out Meltzer...
Related threads: The WrestleMania XXII Preview Thread - A Garbage WrestleMania? - My on-line sportsbook is taking bets on the ME at WM22. - More...
The W - Pro Wrestling - Whither MNM? (Page 2)Register and log in to post!

The W™ message board

©2001-2018 Brothers Zim

This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.449 seconds.