The W
Views: 98638004
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Calendar | Color chart | Log in for more!
2.9.14 2120
The W - Football - Week 9 playoff seedings (Post-MNF and two huge corrections)
This thread has 8 referrals leading to it
Register and log in to post!
Thread rated: 6.02
Pages: 1
(1557 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (10 total)
Zeruel
Thirty Millionth Hit
Moderator








Since: 2.1.02
From: The Silver Spring in the Land of Mary.

Since last post: 3 days
Last activity: 3 hours
#1 Posted on | Instant Rating: 4.05
Here are the Week 9 the playoff seedings. Tiebreakers only done for the top 10 teams in each conference.
The bottom six for each conference is not in any order, other than record, then conference record. Doing detailed tie-breakers at this point in the season would be silly.

I have added how many games back the bottom 10 teams are from the last wild card slot.


AFC
1. Pittsburgh Steelers 7-1 (Beat NE head-to-head) AFC North Leader
2. New England Patriots 7-1 AFC East Leader
3. Denver Broncos 6-3 AFC West Leader
4. Jacksonville Jaguars 5-3 AFC South Leader
5. New York Jets 6-2 Wildcard
6. San Diego Chargers 6-3 Wildcard (Lost to Denver head-to-head)


7. Baltimore Ravens 5-3 (4-2 in AFC) (0.5 GB)
8. Indianapolis Colts 5-3 (3-3 in AFC) (0.5 GB)

9. Houston Texans 4-4 (4-2 in AFC) (1.5 GB)

10. Cleveland Browns 3-5 (2-2 in AFC) (2.5 GB)
11. Kansas City Chiefs 3-5 (2-3 in AFC) (2.5 GB)
12. Tennessee Titans 3-5 (2-4 in AFC) (2.5 GB)
13t. Buffalo Bills 3-5 (2-5 in AFC) (2.5 GB)
13t. Cincinnati Bengals 3-5 (2-5 in AFC) (2.5 GB)

15. Oakland Raiders 3-6 (1-5 in AFC) (3 GB)
16. Miami Dolphins 1-8 (5 GB with 6 to play)

Wildcard Weekend
#6 Chargers @ #3 Broncos
#5 Jets @ #4 Jags
Divisional games
#3 Broncos or Winner of Jets-Jags @ #2 Patriots
Winner of Jets-Jags or #6 Chargers @ #1 Steelers

NFC
1. Philadelphia Eagles 7-1 NFC East Leader
2. Atlanta Falcons 6-2 NFC South Leader
3. Seattle Seahawks 5-3 (5-2 in NFC) NFC West Leader
4. Minnesota Vikings 5-3 (3-2 in NFC) NFC North Leader
5. New York Giants 5-3 Wildcard
6. St. Louis Rams 4-4 (4-2 in NFC, No common games with Packers, 12-20 SoV) Wildcard


7. Green Bay Packers 4-4 (4-2 in NFC, No common games with Rams, 11-21 SoV) (0.5 GB due to Tie-breaker)
8. Detroit Lions 4-4 (3-4 in NFC) (0.5 GB due loss to Packers)

9. Dallas Cowboys 3-5 (2-3 in NFC, beat Was Head-to-head, unknown common games with TB & AZ) (1 GB)
10. Tampa Bay Buccaneers 3-5 (2-3 in NFC, beat NO Head-to-head, unknown common games with Dal & AZ) (1 GB)
11. Arizona Cardinals 3-5 (2-3 in NFC, unknown common games with Dal & TB) (1 GB)
12. Chicago Bears 3-5 (3-5 in NFC) (1 GB)
13. Washington Redskins 3-5 (3-3 in NFC, Lost to Dallas, Beat TB & Chi head-to-head) (1 GB)
14. New Orleans Saints 3-5 (2-4 in NFC, Lost to TB Head-to-head) (1 GB)

15. San Francisco 49ers 1-7, 1-6 in NFC (3 GB)
16. Carolina Panthers 1-7, 0-4 in NFC (3 GB)

Wildcard Weekend
#6 Rams @ #3 Seahawks
#5 Giants @ #4 Vikings
Divisional games
#3 Seahawks or Winner of Giants-Vikings @ #2 Falcons
Winner of Giants-Vikings or #6 Rams @ #1 Eagles


(edited by Zeruel on 9.11.04 0021)


The Catastrophic Annihilation War Room
And now, for a limited time only, it rhymes with "door hinge!"

Promote this thread!
Sec19Row53
Lap cheong








Since: 2.1.02
From: Oconomowoc, WI

Since last post: 6 days
Last activity: 8 hours
Y!:
#2 Posted on | Instant Rating: 7.37
Nit-picking, I think, but shouldn't the three-way tie among St. Louis, Detroit and Green Bay first be broken on Conference record (4-2, 3-4, 4-2), then whatever tiebreaker would take care of StL/GB?



[It's where I sit]
Zeruel
Thirty Millionth Hit
Moderator








Since: 2.1.02
From: The Silver Spring in the Land of Mary.

Since last post: 3 days
Last activity: 3 hours
#3 Posted on | Instant Rating: 4.05
First tie-breaker is always head to head.

The Rams have not played the Lions nor Packers.
The Lions beat the Packers, so the Pac are eliminated.

Tie-breaker #2 is best winning % in the conference.
The Rams 4-2 beats the Lions 3-4


Source:
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?page=tiebreakers

(edited by Zeruel on 8.11.04 1452)



The Catastrophic Annihilation War Room
And now, for a limited time only, it rhymes with "door hinge!"

Sec19Row53
Lap cheong








Since: 2.1.02
From: Oconomowoc, WI

Since last post: 6 days
Last activity: 8 hours
Y!:
#4 Posted on | Instant Rating: 7.37
    Originally posted by Zeruel
    First tie-breaker is always head to head.

    The Rams have not played the Lions or Packers.
    The Lions beat the Packers, so the Pac are eliminated.

    Tie-breaker #2 is best winning % in the conference.
    The Rams 4-2 beats the Lions 3-4


    Source:
    http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?page=tiebreakers

EDIT - Yep, you were right, even after I said otherwise for a second time.

(edited by Sec19Row53 on 8.11.04 1352)


[It's where I sit]
BigSteve
Pepperoni








Since: 23.7.04
From: Baltimore, MD

Since last post: 2791 days
Last activity: 2519 days
#5 Posted on | Instant Rating: 2.00
It doesn't seem like ti's gonna be one of those years where it comes down to five teams for one or two spots at the end of the season with a bunch of crazy tiebreakers. That's disappointing. Whatever happened to parity? Well, as long as the Ravens move up from number 7, I'll be a happy camper.
JayJayDean
Scrapple








Since: 2.1.02
From: Seattle, WA

Since last post: 20 days
Last activity: 4 hours
AIM:  
Y!:
#6 Posted on | Instant Rating: 8.19
    Originally posted by Sec19Row53
    Nit-picking, I think, but shouldn't the three-way tie among St. Louis, Detroit and Green Bay first be broken on Conference record (4-2, 3-4, 4-2), then whatever tiebreaker would take care of StL/GB?


Plus according to NFL.com, when there are three teams tied and two of those teams share a division, you do the division tiebreaker to pare those teams down to one before you start breaking ties among teams who don't share the same division. In other words...

RANKING THE 9-14 NFC TEAMS:

DIVISION TIEBREAKERS
NFC EAST: Dallas > Washington (9/27 - DAL 21, WAS 18)
NFC SOUTH: Tampa Bay > New Orleans (10/10 - TB 20, NO 17)

SEEDS 9-12: Dallas, Tampa Bay, Chicago, Arizona
SEEDS 13-14: New Orleans, Washington

9. DALLAS (NFC win pct. = .400, Strength of victory = .417)
10. TAMPA BAY (NFC win pct. = .400, Strength of victory = .375)
11. ARIZONA (NFC win pct. = .400, Strength of victory = .360)
12. CHICAGO (NFC win pct. = .375)
------------------------------------------------------------
13. WASHINGTON (NFC win pct. = .500)
14. NEW ORLEANS (NFC win pct. = .333)



“To get ass, you’ve got to bring ass." -- Roy Jones Jr.

"Your input has been noted.
I hope you don't take it personally if I disregard it."
-- Guru Zim

"Speak English or face admin retribution." -- CRZ
Net Hack Slasher
Banger








Since: 6.1.02
From: Outer reaches of your mind

Since last post: 3539 days
Last activity: 1959 days
#7 Posted on | Instant Rating: 6.48
Zeruel sayz
-Green Bay Packers 4-4 (4-2 in NFC) (0.5 GB due to the loss to Detriot)
-The Lions beat the Packers, so the Pac are eliminated


Green Bay won their first(and so far only) meeting at Detroit in Week 6(oct 17) by the score of 38-10




smark/net attack wienerville advisory holds at ORANGE alert - High (JBL is STILL WWE champion and now smarks arch enemy HHH is the World Champion. Major red threat, but the undercard seems okay. The alert holds... for now)- 9/19
Zeruel
Thirty Millionth Hit
Moderator








Since: 2.1.02
From: The Silver Spring in the Land of Mary.

Since last post: 3 days
Last activity: 3 hours
#8 Posted on | Instant Rating: 4.05
    Originally posted by Net Hack Slasher
    Zeruel sayz
    -Green Bay Packers 4-4 (4-2 in NFC) (0.5 GB due to the loss to Detriot)
    -The Lions beat the Packers, so the Pac are eliminated


    Green Bay won their first(and so far only) meeting at Detroit in Week 6(oct 17) by the score of 38-10



Well. I just fucked this one up. I was thinking of Chicago...

Well, it's now updated through MNF, and I added yours and JJD's corrections.

Also from ESPN.COM:
With the Dolphins off to the worst start in their 39-year history, Dave Wannstedt will resign Tuesday, the Miami Herald reported. Defensive coordinator Jim Bates is expected to be named interim head coach.


(edited by Zeruel on 9.11.04 0014)



The Catastrophic Annihilation War Room
And now, for a limited time only, it rhymes with "door hinge!"

drjayphd
Scrapple
Moderator








Since: 22.4.02
From: Long Island

Since last post: 2 days
Last activity: 10 hours
AIM:  
ICQ:  
Y!:
#9 Posted on | Instant Rating: 6.67
You wanted the best, you got... Out of Context Quote of the Week.

"...others say my mom sucked 3,000 dicks." (Nag)


Wow. When even DAVE WANNSTEDT'S saying "fuck this shit", you know your team's in trouble. What exactly DO they have to build on? Randy McMichael?



DEAN's Nuggets of Wisdom:

"I don't want him to die. I just want him to NEED my PEE." (as seen here)
whatever
Lap cheong








Since: 12.2.02
From: Cleveland, Ohio

Since last post: 16 days
Last activity: 2 hours
#10 Posted on | Instant Rating: 3.55
Since the Wannstedt resignation ended up here, there's also a mess of injuries from this week. Michael Strahan, Byron Leftwich, Chad Pennington will all be out for at least a few weeks, just to name a few off the top of my head. For the Browns, they loast OL Kelvin Garmon for the rest of the year (knee) and special teamer / backup DB Leigh Bodden for the rest of the year (torn pectoral muscle).



"Lita holds a Stone Cold Steve Austin home pregnancy test. What will the Bottom Line say? “Hell Yeah” or “Eh-EH”?" - Raw Satire, 6/15/04

"Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we. They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do we." - George W. Bush

Thread rated: 6.02
Pages: 1
Thread ahead: Dave Wannstedt steps down
Next thread: NCAA I-A Week 11 BCS Bowl predections
Previous thread: TO Blasts Ray Lewis
(1557 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
"Damn Charlie Garner can't run for nothing on Madden '01" Well he IS a UT alum...I like to cut all UT alums and replace them with my own kick ass created Vandy players. You should get Derek Homer or Moe Williams in there and replace him.
- chuckc14, Game question (2002)
Related threads: And Then There Were None - Week 8 Playoff seedings (including MNF) - No salary cap for 2007??? - More...
The W - Football - Week 9 playoff seedings (Post-MNF and two huge corrections)Register and log in to post!

The W™ message board

ZimBoard
©2001-2014 Brothers Zim

This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.17 seconds.