The W
Views: 97646457
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Calendar | Color chart | Log in for more!
24.7.14 1643
The W - Pro Wrestling - Vote for the new Trish Stratus shirt on WWE.com (Page 2)
This thread has 243 referrals leading to it
Register and log in to post!
Thread rated: 5.79
Pages: Prev 1 2
(7639 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (22 total)
Jun Bakon
Loukanika








Since: 22.11.03
From: Oregon

Since last post: 3893 days
Last activity: 3836 days
AIM:  
#21 Posted on
First off, all the female wrestlers on the roster are nothing more than sex objects for the male audience, as has been previously mentioned. However, none of the women wear training bras and attend classes at the local middle school, so by definition they cannot be masturbation fodder for Jerry Lawler.

Second, if anyone believes that Trish has any say whatsoever in the design of her licensed clothing, that person is sadly mistaken. Her opinion doesn't count, Vince's does. We all know what kind of person Vinnie Mac is.



lethalwrestling.com - We love wrestling.
Selfloathing
Cotto








Since: 28.3.02
From: America, land of freedom.

Since last post: 3852 days
Last activity: 3852 days
#22 Posted on | Instant Rating: 0.00
Voted for the one that implied that I have sex in my stupid loser pro wrestling fan life.


Oh wai



Visit my livejournal.
Pages: Prev 1 2
Thread rated: 5.79
Pages: Prev 1 2
Thread ahead: Flair/Windham - Will it finally get its due?
Next thread: Goldust a free agent in 2004?
Previous thread: Speaking of WWE DVDs
(7639 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
Well, consider they have to curtain off sections of arenas now. Attendance is going down. It could level off like pre-attitude and rise again. Or it could spin into an abyss like WCW. Also consider that the 12-17 males are tuning out in droves.
- kokolums2, Ratings problems? (2002)
The W - Pro Wrestling - Vote for the new Trish Stratus shirt on WWE.com (Page 2)Register and log in to post!

The W™ message board

ZimBoard
©2001-2014 Brothers Zim

This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.439 seconds.