The W
Views: 117307597
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Calendar | Color chart | Log in for more!
28.10.16 1106
The W - Football - Vanderjagt criticizes Colts (Page 2)
This thread has 136 referrals leading to it
Register and log in to post!
Pages: Prev 1 2(2170 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
Post (23 total)

Since: 7.11.02
From: Dallas, TX

Since last post: 842 days
Last activity: 345 days
#21 Posted on

    Originally posted by haz
    Vanderjagt accomplished what he wanted, sort of...

    At least Manning is showing some fire. Let's just wait and see if it comes through on the field next year.

    I also heard that Manning made some comment about Vanderjagt being drunk when he made the comments, but did not hear the clip. Did he really say that???

Here's a link to a brief article that quotes Manning:

(BTW--thanks for the linkifying tips, CRZ)
Net Hack Slasher

Since: 6.1.02
From: Outer reaches of your mind

Since last post: 4325 days
Last activity: 2745 days
#22 Posted on
Looks like Poppa Manning didn't teach his kid to take criticism too well. I guess Ryan Leaf wasn't the only suck QB that came out that year.

Accusing Vander of being a lush. Very mature Patty, is he a pooh pooh head as well.

Oh they have the internet on computers now!
Lap cheong

Since: 7.2.02
From: New York, NY

Since last post: 4144 days
Last activity: 3924 days
#23 Posted on | Instant Rating: 0.00
I wonder how many audibles Manning called before he answered each question?

'I'm, like, angry at numbers.'

'Yeah, there's to many of them and stuff.'

Pages: Prev 1 2
Pages: Prev 1 2Thread ahead: Signing Day
Next thread: Could Mariucci Do ANYTHING with the Lions?
Previous thread: General NFL questions
(2170 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
I've explained this before, but evidently it needs to be explained again. The Rose Bowl COULD NOT HAVE JUST "PICKED" GEORGIA.
- Eddie Famous, Happy Bowl Day!! (2008)
The W - Football - Vanderjagt criticizes Colts (Page 2)Register and log in to post!

The W™ message board

©2001-2016 Brothers Zim

This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.137 seconds.