The W
May 17, 2011 - save.jpg
Views: 178574154
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Calendar | Color chart | Log in for more!
18.3.24 2140
The W - Pro Wrestling - Undisputed Title Defense Register and log in to post!
Pages: 1(14749 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (6 total)
BigDaddyLoco
Scrapple








Since: 2.1.02

Since last post: 318 days
Last activity: 318 days
#1 Posted on
So is this title going to be defended more than once a month? Will the winner of Austin/Taker fight the winner of H/H on Monday, or do we have to wait another month for a title match? Having the title defended once a month seems to make the number one contendership seem a lot more important, but that's really about it. Maybe this has already been addressed and I missed it, but everyone seems to be under the impression that the winner of Austin/Taker goes on to the next ppv.



Promote this thread!
AWArulz
Scrapple








Since: 28.1.02
From: Louisville, KY

Since last post: 90 days
Last activity: 90 days
#2 Posted on
    Originally posted by BigDaddyLoco
    So is this title going to be defended more than once a month?
    >>>>>>>>>

    I'm sure they're still figuring this deal out. I hope that's not going to be the case, because I want to see title matches, preferably on both Raw and Smackdown.

    It might be interesting to see HH win and see how long VKM keeps the strap on him after reactions at the houses. But I suspect we'll see HH talk and Austin talk and underbiker talk and RVD wrestle.

    (edited by AWArulz on 19.4.02 1554)
    He's got the Iron Claw sunk in!!
spf
Scrapple








Since: 2.1.02
From: The Las Vegas of Canada

Since last post: 3060 days
Last activity: 395 days
#3 Posted on
I think they said it would be at the next PPV, but I could be wrong. And personally I like the whole few defenses thing. I could see myself very happy with one defense per month on each show, and one PPV defense.



"You used it to shove your miserable daughter down our throats week in and week out...not anymore!" - Ric Flair gives me hope, Raw 3/18/02

"I thought it was cool how HHH just tossed Jericho out of the ring and made him vanish, possibly into another dimension, at the end of the match." - Dr. Unlikely says the funniest thing I've ever read on Wienerville.

twoelitistsnobs, filling all your bitter pop culture reviewing needs
ekedolphin
Scrapple








Since: 12.1.02
From: Indianapolis, IN; now residing in Suffolk, VA

Since last post: 480 days
Last activity: 4 days
#4 Posted on | Instant Rating: 4.52

My thoughts:

As long as the title's defended at least once a month, I've got no problem with it personally. And in the interim, the champ's out cutting promos, running the occasional non-title match or tag-team match, and staying in the spotlight. I've got no problem with that.

It's when the champ wins the belt and disappears for a few months, returning and still being champion, that I get pissed. That's why I used to loathe Hulk Hogan.



“If there's anything I hate, it's a loud-mouthed Canadian with blonde hair who dresses like a rock star... except you, you're cool.”

--Kurt Angle to Chris Jericho, Smackdown 4/11/2002


Support your local indy fed. Mine is WCWO.

J. Kyle
Banger








Since: 21.2.02
From: The Land of Aloha

Since last post: 1551 days
Last activity: 1331 days
#5 Posted on
The SmarKow Says:

Once a month is fine. Too many defenses was overkill. Maybe they ARE trying to make the title worth something again.



VISIT SMARKTOWN!


****You just got SMARKED UPSIDE THE THREAD****
BigDaddyLoco
Scrapple








Since: 2.1.02

Since last post: 318 days
Last activity: 318 days
#6 Posted on

    Once a month is fine. Too many defenses was overkill


I always prefered the fighting champion. I really enjoyed Triple H's title reign when he wanted to prove he was that damn good and fought all commers, Taz, TAKA, whoever.



Pages: 1Thread ahead: Yet another wacked WWF poll
Next thread: Anybody know the status of "Sunny" these days?
Previous thread: Tough Enough 4.18.02
(14749 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
Personally, I did enjoy parts of 2000's wrestling, but I was talking about how things were dwindling in that year, leading up to now, where things are a little stagnant. I didn't say that 2000 was bad, as implied or misunderstood.
The W - Pro Wrestling - Undisputed Title DefenseRegister and log in to post!

The W™ message board

ZimBoard
©2001-2024 Brothers Zim

This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.437 seconds.