Originally posted by TheBucsFanDoes anyone on this board have a problem with what Felt did? Stories about him always mention that many call(ed) him a traitor, but I've never met anyone that takes that position.
A traitor to Nixon? Absolutely. A traitor to his country? Absolutely not. Nixon and his men gave up any right to "loyalty" when the crimes went down. To call him a traitor to Nixon is true, but is roughly the same as the guy at the copy center calling you a traitor because you let the cops know that HE was the one that burnt the place down.
The real question is, if his critics had to pick a side, I wonder how many of them would truly choose to be a traitor to their country rather than their president given the guilt and corruption involved.
If race-blindness were possible (or even REALLY promoted), then none of this would be discussed, don't you agree? Before there was an AA type of movement, there were no laws/initatives, so I guess you can say things were "race blind.