The W
May 17, 2011 - save.jpg
Views: 178575140
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Calendar | Color chart | Log in for more!
18.3.24 2152
The W - Pro Wrestling - Raven + other files lawsuit; independent contractors
This thread has 22 referrals leading to it
Register and log in to post!
Thread rated: 3.63
Pages: 1
(4695 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (8 total)
Spank E
Bockwurst








Since: 2.1.02
From: Plymouth, UK

Since last post: 1794 days
Last activity: 22 days
#1 Posted on | Instant Rating: 2.00
http://www.prowrestling.net/artman/publish/WWE/article1002388.shtml

From ProWrestling.net, via F4Wonline.com (or whatever the address for that site is...)

This could be an interesting one to watch. The gist is former WWE talent have a filed a lawsuit challenging the independent contractor status of WWE talent.



Promote this thread!
MisterHenderson
Boerewors








Since: 3.5.06
From: New York

Since last post: 5265 days
Last activity: 5183 days
#2 Posted on | Instant Rating: 1.12
Good for them, I wish them luck. Everyone knows the independent contractor label is BS. Vince just wants to save money on taxes.



I had just bent down to tighten my nuts, and there was a double yellow line, see? And next thing I knew, there was policeman behind me. He put a sticker on my helmet and tried to clamp me.
emma
Cherries > Peaches








Since: 1.8.02
From: Phoenix-ish

Since last post: 435 days
Last activity: 157 days
#3 Posted on | Instant Rating: 8.34
IMO, they'll settle out of court. And in fact, I'm not inclined to support Raven et al, at least at face value.

I've been an independent contractor. And I've worked for companies who've had these kinds of suits filed against them & lost. So. the way it works, there is an edict that no independent contractor can be retained for more than 18 months (IIRC), lest the company be subject to this kind of suit. The contractor can't be re-signed for another 12 months. All irrespective of whether the contractor *wants* to retain a contractor status (which has it's own set of upside, if you have a clue.) All this does is make for a whole bunch of churn in the legitimate contractor community. (e.g. I'd be happy contracting for Company A for the next 4 years. However. because of the restrictions resulting from this lawsuit, I need to thrash back & forth between Company A & Company B on an annual basis. Nobody's happy.)

So, what, HHH, JBL, Big Show & Batista would all be regular employees (with bonus plan & profit sharing), & everybody else (from Punk to Morrison to Funaki) churns back & forth to/from TNA on a yearly basis, with a "contract negotiation" on every turn-over? How exactly would that be a good thing for much of anybody?
Deputy Marshall
Liverwurst








Since: 28.6.04
From: Troy, NY

Since last post: 3441 days
Last activity: 2962 days
#4 Posted on | Instant Rating: 4.39
I strongly suspect this is going to court. This isn't exactly a new gripe with WWE, and with the company being public for some time now, I have a sneaking suspicion this sort of thing has been threatened before and put down with some quick "go away" money thrown at the prospective plaintiffs. But the fact that WWE made a point to mention it and the wording they used says to me that they have an indication that this absolutely won't be settled out of court.
    Originally posted by emma
    So what, HHH, JBL, Big Show & Batista would all be regular employees (with bonus plan & profit sharing), & everybody else (from Punk to Morrison to Funaki) churns back & forth to/from TNA on a yearly basis, with a "contract negotiation" on every turn-over? How exactly would that be a good thing for much of anybody?

But if Levy et al. did win the suit, wouldn't it follow that they'd have to consider guys like Punk, Morrison, and Funaki employees in order to have them meet the basic demands and requirements of working a WWE schedule?

(deleted by Deputy Marshall on 9.8.08 0210)

(resurrected by Deputy Marshall on 9.8.08 0221)

(edited by Deputy Marshall on 9.8.08 0222)

KevinMarshallOnline.com - Blog, podcasts, comics, and more!



* Living Under Marshall Law Podcast Latest episode uploaded 6/27/08 (Tim Russert, George Carlin, Hulkamania running wild via a raging inferno in your kitchen, and Mixed Martial Malarkey (c) Justin Shapiro)

RSS: http://kevinmarshall.libsyn.com/rss


***Now available in the iTunes Music Store!
MisterHenderson
Boerewors








Since: 3.5.06
From: New York

Since last post: 5265 days
Last activity: 5183 days
#5 Posted on | Instant Rating: 1.12
Eric Bischoff wrote about the lawsuit in a recent blog on his website.

http://www.ericbischoff.com/blog.asp?Path=T1,0003&MaxListings=

It's very interesting read, and Eric lends some very good insight and opinion into this matter as well as his own experience with something similar in WCW.

He also takes the time to list the guidelines the IRS uses to define employee/independent contractor status.

Highly recommended.

(edited by MisterHenderson on 14.8.08 2026)


I had just bent down to tighten my nuts, and there was a double yellow line, see? And next thing I knew, there was policeman behind me. He put a sticker on my helmet and tried to clamp me.
PeterStork
Sujuk








Since: 25.1.02
From: Chicagoland with Hoosiers, or "The Region"

Since last post: 3281 days
Last activity: 3043 days
#6 Posted on | Instant Rating: 4.41
    Originally posted by MisterHenderson
    Eric Bischoff wrote about the lawsuit in a recent blog on his website.

    http://www.ericbischoff.com/blog.asp?Path=T1,0003&MaxListings=

    It's very interesting read, and Eric lends some very good insight and opinion into this matter as well as his own experience with something similar in WCW.

    He also takes the time to list the guidelines the IRS uses to define employee/independent contractor status.

    Highly recommended.

    (edited by MisterHenderson on 14.8.08 2026)


Nice read. If Eric's correct about the legal differences between an employee and independent contractor, there's no question that WWE wrestlers are the former.



exit 670 dot com | digital route 66
TheOldMan
Landjager








Since: 13.2.03
From: Chicago

Since last post: 3276 days
Last activity: 1487 days
#7 Posted on | Instant Rating: 5.41
    Originally posted by Eric Bischoff
    The argument (among high mucky-mucks) was that the exposure to Turner/Time Warner due to a potential adverse IRS determination regarding this issue could have resulted in fines, increased cost of business going forward, and a hit to TWX stock as a result.


    (from the IRS list of determining Employee, or Contractor)

    4. Services Rendered Personally

    Services must be rendered personally. An employee does not engage other people to do the work.
    Contractors are able to assign their own workers to do the job.


So does this mean that the nWo B-Team was a tax dodge all along?



Dawg
Chourico








Since: 2.6.03
From: Detroit area

Since last post: 3206 days
Last activity: 1543 days
#8 Posted on | Instant Rating: 2.27
Really good read and from what I've heard from others after bringing up the lawsuit, Bishoff is pretty much dead on with the IRS regulations.

I think the big thing is that WWE wrestlers absolutely do not set their own hours. That's for damn sure.

Also, the "furnishing of tools" rule. Who owns the microphones and to a lesser and more humor extent, the tables, ladders and chairs. It wouldn't be unreasonable to argue that a chair is a "tool of a job" to a wrestler and the WWE purchases those...

Maybe we'll be seeing more wrestlers carrying tables to the ring like Public Enemy used to???
Thread rated: 3.63
Pages: 1
Thread ahead: Smackdown! 08/15/2008
Next thread: Who Is Suicide?
Previous thread: Orton re-injured
(4695 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
HE SOLD THE ARM LIKE MURDER. Not only that, but Taker puts Foley over, Foley puts HHH over...
Related threads: Release season: 8.8.8 - Foley done? - Ric Flair Parts Ways With WWE - More...
The W - Pro Wrestling - Raven + other files lawsuit; independent contractorsRegister and log in to post!

The W™ message board

ZimBoard
©2001-2024 Brothers Zim

This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.323 seconds.