The W
Views: 129675787
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Calendar | Color chart | Log in for more!
14.12.17 0852
The W - Movies & TV - Question for movie buffs: Kubrick lighting
This thread has 219 referrals leading to it
Register and log in to post!
Thread rated: 5.06
Pages: 1
(4772 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (5 total)
Parts Unknown
Lap cheong








Since: 2.1.02
From: Darkenwood

Since last post: 78 days
Last activity: 78 days
#1 Posted on | Instant Rating: 4.92
Thanks in advance for any help you all can give me. I've been searching the Net for articles about how Stanley Kubrick achieved his lighting techniques. Kubrick films have a noticeably diffused lighting scheme and I was wondering how I might duplicate it, just for kicks. Examples are the candles in many films including Eyes Wide Shut and Barry Lyndon, or the light from the fixtures in The Shining and Dr. Strangelove.
Promote this thread!
Cerebus
Scrapple








Since: 17.11.02

Since last post: 164 days
Last activity: 159 days
#2 Posted on | Instant Rating: 0.97
I don't know about articles you can look up, but it was done with regular film lighting and cloth light blockers.

Just get some bright spot lights and place different colored fabric of various thickness over it untill you get the desird effect.

Another thing to do is keep in mind the color the room you are filming in is. This makes a huge difference as to how 'bright' the film comes out.
Parts Unknown
Lap cheong








Since: 2.1.02
From: Darkenwood

Since last post: 78 days
Last activity: 78 days
#3 Posted on | Instant Rating: 4.67
Thanks for the answer, but I don't think you're entirely correct. In The Shining, for example, even bare bulbs (such as on chandeliers) have that big, diffused glow. There is obviously no fabric around them.
oldschoolhero
Knackwurst








Since: 2.1.02
From: nWo Country

Since last post: 3135 days
Last activity: 3069 days
#4 Posted on | Instant Rating: 6.80
I could be wrong, but I'm fairly sure the Barry Lyndon in particular was lit completely au naturel-that is to say, when you see the candles lighting the scenes, they're the only things doing it.



"That Squirrel Can Waterski!"

Wolfram J. Paulovich
Frankfurter








Since: 11.11.02
From: Fat City, Baby

Since last post: 4104 days
Last activity: 3475 days
AIM:  
#5 Posted on | Instant Rating: 5.58
    Originally posted by oldschoolhero
    I could be wrong, but I'm fairly sure the Barry Lyndon in particular was lit completely au naturel-that is to say, when you see the candles lighting the scenes, they're the only things doing it.

From what I remember from Stanley Kubrick: A Life in Film (or whatever that bio was that HBO ran 5 times a week for 18 months), Kubrick got some Zeiss (sp?) lenses that NASA developed. They enabled him to shoot all of his interior scenes in natural candlelight, which was the first time anyone had been able to do that in film. I don't know if every scene in the movie was filmed in natural light or not, but a great deal of it was. I wish I had a more helpful answer for you, but what little I know of Kubrick's film techniques seems to involve incredibly expensive equipment.



The Obtuse Angle Archive.
Thread rated: 5.06
Pages: 1
Thread ahead: Earl/Office Tandem A Big Success
Next thread: The Pink Panther Classic Cartoon Collection
Previous thread: The Shield - S5/E4 - Tapa Boca
(4772 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
Supergirl was also referenced via the photos, as well as by name. :nerd: So how did Clark escape? Wasn't he still in a Kryptonite cage, thus making him pretty powerless thus unable to survive a secret base exploding??
The W - Movies & TV - Question for movie buffs: Kubrick lightingRegister and log in to post!

The W™ message board

ZimBoard
©2001-2017 Brothers Zim

This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.242 seconds.