If she takes the belt and arbitrarily names a champion, then it will suck. BUT if she takes the belt and sets up a match or tournament for it, it won't really be that bad. It'd be just like stripping Trips of one of the crowns, except it'd have storyline backup.
Ahh, if it's a quick way to split the belts so each half-fed gets one then so be it. It's not the stupidest extension of the 50-50 divorce settlement. Yes, it would be nice if the belts could be split via a wrestling-related angle, but what's the likelihood of that?
Plus if they split everything 50% that they bought during the marriage, Stephanie is going to look pretty stupid with only one gigantic silicone breast, which should be worth a laugh .
"Nobody enjoys a good time more than I do, but this business of yours is as legitimate as a three-legged donkey...which of course is illegitimate because as we all know donkeys have four legs."
FWIW Meltzer has mentioned that the WWE has a guy on the creative staff that monitors TNA and ROH programming, and reports back on it, and according to Meltzer, Vince felt the WWE could do a better job with a couple of their concepts, and that's why many ...