The only things I like on the Smarks are:*clip* 2)The Scotsman-a quote from a recent update of his:
"In an interview with Slam Wrestling, Sid admitted he'd like to get back in the ring, and if he had it his way he'd come back as one of the "worst heels" we've ever seen. Well, he's already proved he can be one of the "worst wrestlers", so it's safe to say that he's got a leg to stand on in that argument....or does he?"
Well there goes one of those 2 reasons you mentioned. I think he needs to take up residence at the Slash, or he go to 411 where all banished writers seem to end up (Hyatte, Eric S.)
That's been happening a lot lately--my decision to no longer go there is mostly because of Scotsman no longer being there, but it's also hard to justify going to a site that is down so much. Smarks.com is fast becoming the WCW of websites.
Hmm...I saw it as a final way to break the self-dillusionary thought that this was all a work. Can one be truthful in reporting in and remain classy? Tell the tough stuff in an impartial manner? I think so. I think that post does just that.