The W
Views: 99904291
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Calendar | Color chart | Log in for more!
21.10.14 2348
The W - Random - The....new...bat...mobile?
This thread has 8 referrals leading to it
Register and log in to post!
Thread rated: 5.60
Pages: 1
(1630 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (2 total)
lmo911
Italian








Since: 2.1.02
From: A ways past Parts Unknown and to the left of Dudleyville

Since last post: 3533 days
Last activity: 1281 days
AIM:  
#1 Posted on | Instant Rating: 5.74




I really don't know what to think about this. It's in a field, so it could be a Bat-Hummer(He did have a tank in the comics once.) but if THIS is really the Batmobile, I'm dissapointed.

I mean they got a kick ass cast and then screw the pooch on the second most important cast member? I say thee nay!

Could be worse I guess, Batman could be all fast and furious, but atleatst that would fit the character better.

Discuss.

(deleted by lmo911 on 30.3.04 2205)

(resurrected by lmo911 on 30.3.04 2205)



Ummm...

"Mmmm, pop tarts!"

So I drew a blank! Sue me!
Promote this thread!
Quezzy
Knackwurst








Since: 6.1.02
From: The Moon

Since last post: 10 hours
Last activity: 10 hours
AIM:  
#2 Posted on | Instant Rating: 5.89
Well that batmobile sucks. Ok yeah, I don't have much to say other than that I was just trying to get lmo's post of the batmobile some replies because he provided pictures! Not just some silly link.



Lance's Response:

THAT IS AWESOME!
Thread rated: 5.60
Pages: 1
Thread ahead: 24 4:00AM - 5:00AM
Next thread: So, any good pranks you guys know of?
Previous thread: Jack Black in "Kong Kong"
(1630 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
I'm just wondering how they can get away with fooling someone again after the last Joe Schmo.
- BOSsportsfan34, Joe Schmo 2 (2004)
Related threads: Batman's new ride... - Comic Book Movie News!! - Oldman Joins Batman Begins Cast - More...
The W - Random - The....new...bat...mobile?Register and log in to post!

The W™ message board

ZimBoard
©2001-2014 Brothers Zim

This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.129 seconds.