The W
Views: 100666672
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Calendar | Color chart | Log in for more!
20.11.14 1719
The W - Pro Wrestling - The WWE "switch"
This thread has 3 referrals leading to it
Register and log in to post!
Pages: 1(13151 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (2 total)
dMp
Banger








Since: 4.1.02
From: The Hague, Netherlands (Europe)

Since last post: 5 days
Last activity: 1 hour
#1 Posted on
actually it makes sense that is it WWE and not the WWE.
it sounds better without the 'the'.
'the world wrestling entertainment' isn't gramatically right.

And still, maybe its still a federation? they just dont call it that in the official name.

WWF=WWFE=WWE so Just Joe worked for WWE..

would waiting a week make a difference? no matter if they change it on a friday, saturday or sunday, the change had to be done sudden, and apparently fast..




"...And I use that to fuck them some place fairly uncomfortable."
"What, like the back of a volkswagen ?"
-Mallrats
Promote this thread!
BDC
Chourico








Since: 26.1.02
From: Falls Church, VA

Since last post: 4494 days
Last activity: 3951 days
AIM:  
#2 Posted on
Shockingly enough, that very same paragraph from the website was commented on yesterday in the "WWE? Hah" thread.

By me.



World Wrestling Entertainment? Did they even say it out loud or in a sentence?

Triple H: The only thing that matters to me is that belt. I will become World...Wrestling...Entertainment...CHAMPION!!!
Pages: 1Thread ahead: Let the revelry begin! THE DEATH VALLEY DRIVER Video Review 500 Update for May 2002!
Next thread: Trivial, but.. WTF??
Previous thread: Smackdown Feedback
(13151 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
"At the end of the day it's not if you can do a majistral cradle or a 450 reverse double plancha dive. It's do I give a s*** about this guy or not?" Is la majistral really that hard to do? I bet I could figure it out.
The W - Pro Wrestling - The WWE "switch"Register and log in to post!

The W™ message board

ZimBoard
©2001-2014 Brothers Zim

This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.385 seconds.