The W
Views: 100808259
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Calendar | Color chart | Log in for more!
24.11.14 1218
The W - Football - The W Survival League: 2009 style (Week 12)
This thread has 4 referrals leading to it
Register and log in to post!
Thread rated: 8.20
Pages: 1
(633 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (3 total)
CRZ
Big Brother
Administrator








Since: 9.12.01
From: ミネアポリス

Since last post: 14 hours
Last activity: 33 min.
AIM:  
ICQ:  
Y!:
#1 Posted on | Instant Rating: 8.85
Aw, how boring.
Carnage's picks of pain  CIN 44.97% CLE
Reacharound Cupcake CIN 44.97% CLE
This almost guarantees a Browns victory tomorrow and NO WINNER.

(edited by CRZ on 28.11.09 2212)


Promote this thread!
The Goon
Boudin blanc
Moderator








Since: 2.1.02
From: Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Since last post: 13 days
Last activity: 22 min.
#2 Posted on | Instant Rating: 8.05
I figured the Bengals would be the team of choice and briefly considered going with someone else to "mix it up", but I've come TOO FAR to mess with things now.
carnage
Cotto








Since: 16.2.05

Since last post: 14 days
Last activity: 14 days
#3 Posted on | Instant Rating: 7.71
We live to see another week. Is this the longest it has lasted? I am not happy with my current selection for week 13 but there are some slim pickings out there.
Thread rated: 8.20
Pages: 1
Thread ahead: 2009 BCS rankings - week 7 (14)
Next thread: 2009 Grey Cup: Montréal 28, Saskatchewan 27
Previous thread: College Football Week 12
(633 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
Eh, if the Titans had found a way to beat the Patriots, they wouldn't have beaten my Colts-- in fact, the Colts would be the Super Bowl Champions.
- ekedolphin, Antowain Smith now a Titan (2004)
Related threads: The W Survival League: 2009 style (Week 11) - The W Survival League: 2009 style (Week 10) - The W Survival League: 2009 style (Week 9) - More...
The W - Football - The W Survival League: 2009 style (Week 12)Register and log in to post!

The W™ message board

ZimBoard
©2001-2014 Brothers Zim

This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.102 seconds.