The W
Views: 106131138
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Calendar | Color chart | Log in for more!
2.8.15 2137
The W - Print - The Da Vinci Code sucks
This thread has 15 referrals leading to it
Register and log in to post!
Thread rated: 5.22
Pages: 1
(493 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (8 total)
Parts Unknown
Lap cheong








Since: 2.1.02
From: Darkenwood

Since last post: 35 days
Last activity: 5 days
#1 Posted on | Instant Rating: 4.49
Yeah, I said it.
Some of my friends, coworkers and acquaintances have been bitten by the Da Vinci bug recently. I like to be as relevant as possible, so I picked up the paperback and gave it a read. What I found astounded me: this book is a long, boring dissertation obviously couched in melodramatic pseudo-intrigue. I can't believe this thing has attracted so much attention. All of the theories about Christ have been around a loooong time before the book, but it seems people think it's some kind of recent revelation.
At what point did I realize how lame this book was going to be? When the author lazily described (well, it's not really description) Sophie as being "not beautiful like the cookie-cutter blondes on dorm room walls." Give me a break! If you can't write a real description, don't make a book.
Now granted, I'm just some putz who is NOT a best selling author, but color me disappointed. Your thoughts?




"How could we possibly appreciate the Mona Lisa if Leonardo had written at the bottom of the canvas: 'The lady is smiling because she is hiding a secret from her lover.' This would shackle the viewer to reality, and I don't want this to happen to 2001." - Stanley Kubrick
Promote this thread!
wmatistic
Andouille








Since: 2.2.04
From: Austin, TX

Since last post: 7 days
Last activity: 23 hours
AIM:  
#2 Posted on | Instant Rating: 3.65
Honestly I enjoyed the book up until the ending, which sucked. Angels and Demons is a million times better from start to finish. I think the popularity just came from it being an ok story trying to play up certain "facts" that a lot of people were never exposed to. Now considering a lot of its theories and facts were taken from a book which is now considered a joke doesn't really matter, cause no one knew that until the documentaries started appearing on History, A&E, Discovery and every other channel. That and in case you didn't notice, some religious types can be a little loud and edgy when anything they believe is challenged, and tend to take the things they read a little too literally. I think their uproar is a huge part of why the book remains popular.
Cerebus
Scrapple








Since: 17.11.02

Since last post: 2 days
Last activity: 1 day
#3 Posted on | Instant Rating: 0.97
I still haven't read it.

I did read Angels & Demosa, which I thought was better then it had any right to be, cuase after trying to read Deception Point, I figured Dan Brown was a hack.

I will see the movie, though, because Tom Hanks' mullet looks AWESOME!
Wolfram J. Paulovich
Frankfurter








Since: 11.11.02
From: Fat City, Baby

Since last post: 3239 days
Last activity: 2610 days
AIM:  
#4 Posted on | Instant Rating: 5.78
You'll get no argument from me. The book is just terrible, and Angels and Demons is just as bad. I think the thing that drove me insane, apart from writing that struggled to be two-dimensional, was the sheer volume of errors in both books. I can understand getting things wrong in order to facilitate your fictional plots. But Brown throws in mistakes in the background, periphery, wherever! It's obvious that in addition to being a bad writer, he's also a bad researcher. So of course he writes quasi-historical fiction. Wonderful.


Edit - to add something I posted here from way back, with a little edit:

    I have a friend who lives waaaaaay out in county property, in the boonies. [He has no neighbors even remotely close by.] He likes to fire off guns at night to blow off steam, like Hunter Thompson. Someone bought him a copy of The Da Vinci Code, and he couldn't give it away. He asked me if I wanted it, and I said, "Hell no!" He said, "Man, I don't want it either." For whatever reason, I said, "Make it your shootin' book." Apparently, he did. Now I'm sort of secretly hoping that someone gives me a copy of it for Christmas, so I can drive down to his house and blow a copy apart. I think it would be very therapeutic.


(edited by Jeb Tennyson Lund on 4.5.06 2204)


The Obtuse Angle Archive.
Roy.
Pepperoni








Since: 25.2.04
From: Keystone State

Since last post: 2641 days
Last activity: 1110 days
#5 Posted on | Instant Rating: 4.84
I thought it was a good "beach" book. Nothing too deep, easy to skim, and cookie cutter characters. The perfect book for me, really, especially when classes are in session. I had a gift card to Barnes and Noble, and added it to a large book purchase on a whim (it had just come out and I had read Deception Point and Angels and Demons). I devoured it in a few days, and promptly forgot about it.

When it blew up, I was amazed, simply because there seemed to be an inordinate amount of people (*smart* people I know) who believed it to be semi-historical, and they began looking stuff up online and at libraries. Then the religious groups got involved in boycotts and protests, and I think that fueled the buying. Controversy sells, as does no paperback printing for two+ years.

I think some of the backlash ("this books sucks") is because, well, people sometimes expect best selling books to be a good read.

Alessandro
Lap cheong








Since: 2.1.02
From: Worcester MA

Since last post: 3 days
Last activity: 1 day
#6 Posted on | Instant Rating: 3.04
I haven't been following this whole plagiarism deal that the Da Vinci Code is going through, but I read The Tomb of God many years back (a "non-fiction" book) and everytime I hear people talking about the book's plotline, it just sounds like a total rip-off to me.





Mean Green Boston Celtics Message BoardUnofficial Boogeyman Fan Club MemberAre you ready for a web site so hot its gonna feel like somebody took a trayful of cookies and BAKED EM UP IN YOUR ASS


dunkndollaz
Banger
Back to Back Survivor








Since: 3.1.02
From: Northern NJ

Since last post: 11 days
Last activity: 2 days
#7 Posted on | Instant Rating: 7.01
This book made perfect reading material for the train. Not too deep that I would miss my stop. I'm glad I only blew $7.99 on it and I will wait for the DVD to see the movie as there is no way in hell that this book will ever translate into a "$100 Movie" for me no matter how awesome Tom Hanks' mullet may be.......



Hey Crab Man !
Jobberman
Kishke








Since: 2.1.02
From: West Palm Beach, FL

Since last post: 365 days
Last activity: 19 days
#8 Posted on
I liked it. Didn't take it as historical fact, but I liked it.

I liked "Angels and Demons" and 'Deception Point" better.
Thread rated: 5.22
Pages: 1
Thread ahead: Any Stanley Bing reading W's?
Next thread: 52
Previous thread: Infinite Crisis #7: It all ends here! (Spoilers)
(493 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
I wonder how he would have felt about the Fantastic Four movie? I'm torn on whether he would appreciate seeing it in some form on the big screen (and hopefully getting some scratch outta the deal)
The W - Print - The Da Vinci Code sucksRegister and log in to post!

The W™ message board

ZimBoard
©2001-2015 Brothers Zim

This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.125 seconds.