The W
Views: 128211423
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Calendar | Color chart | Log in for more!
26.9.17 0758
The W - Pro Wrestling - The Best Current Commentator?
This thread has 1 referral leading to it
Register and log in to post!
Thread rated: 4.26
Pages: 1
(8066 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
Post (6 total)
El Nino

Since: 18.2.04
From: Pune, India

Since last post: 4508 days
Last activity: 3240 days
#1 Posted on | Instant Rating: 2.14
As I was watching SmackDown the other day, it came to my mind that Jim Ross is ludicrously overrated. With that in mind, of the four main announcers (King, JR, Tazz, Cole), who is the best?

Now I know a lot of people will say Good Ol' JR without actually thinking about it...but really, he's been horrible as of late. I paid attention a little bit, and I realized that he i) has a heart attack anytime anyone acts a bit heelish, ii) doesn't call suplexes at all, iii) knows the names of maybe ten moves, iv) doesn't know the difference between a spinebuster and a powerbomb (watch any of DAVE Batista's matches), and v) is generally boring.

I'll take Tazz over him any given time or day.

Your opinions are wrong and stupid.
Promote this thread!
Big Brother

Since: 9.12.01
From: ミネアポリス

Since last post: 4 days
Last activity: 3 days
#2 Posted on | Instant Rating: 8.65
    Originally posted by El Nino
    Now I know a lot of people will say Good Ol' JR without actually thinking about it
This bit gives the impression that you don't actually read this forum.

Lap cheong

Since: 18.6.02
From: North Cacalacky

Since last post: 3010 days
Last activity: 615 days
#3 Posted on | Instant Rating: 5.58
I truly think Tazz could make a broomstick seem like a world-class commentator. So I gotta' go with Tazz.

Although, a few months ago, Ernest Miller was definitley in the "So Atrociously Bad That He's Great" category.

The answer to WWE's financial problems...

Since: 10.1.03
From: Enter your city here

Since last post: 3246 days
Last activity: 1301 days
#4 Posted on | Instant Rating: 3.52
Well your first point isn't bad, but I'd argue that having a heart attack when someone acts heelish, isn't bad if you have a heel guy in color. Lawler isn't a heel, he might take the heel side in a lot of cases, but it irks the hell out of me when a heel does something real bad, and instead of justifying it like a good heel color guy should do, he acts just as shocked as angered as JR. Maybe a vote for a new color guy is the answer, I enjoy JR's knowledge at times, but the chemistry between him and the king has gone from acid to bitter. I just fear the next announcing crew as Coach and Josh Matthews. Please god no!

Y2J 420

Since: 2.12.03
From: Illinois

Since last post: 4206 days
Last activity: 4139 days
#5 Posted on | Instant Rating: 2.18
I'd still take JR...just for personal reasons...or until Bobby Heenan comes back...

"Win if you can, lose if you must, but in the end, always cheat..." - Jesse "the Body" Ventura

Since: 30.1.04
From: U.S.A./PL

Since last post: 4941 days
Last activity: 4491 days
#6 Posted on | Instant Rating: 3.36
I'll say Tazz.

Thread rated: 4.26
Pages: 1
Thread ahead: Wrestlers on TV shows this month
Next thread: Please Explain Flair and HBK...
Previous thread: what if taker comes back as the biker???
(8066 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
Beating Hogan is beating Hogan -- no matter the organization. I don't understand why he wouldn't or couldn't be referring to that. Unlike a lot of other wrestlers past their prime (within reason), beating Hogan still carries significance.
- Whattaburger, RAW #780 5/5/08 (Cinco de Mayo!) (2008)
The W - Pro Wrestling - The Best Current Commentator?Register and log in to post!

The W™ message board

©2001-2017 Brothers Zim

This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.544 seconds.