The W
Views: 132009076
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Calendar | Color chart | Log in for more!
21.4.18 1048
The W - Football - The W Survival League: 2012.02 (Page 2)
This thread has 3 referrals leading to it
Register and log in to post!
Thread rated: 6.66
Pages: Prev 1 2
(271 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (23 total)
The King of Keith
Lap cheong








Since: 4.11.02
From: Winchester, VA

Since last post: 1226 days
Last activity: 1225 days
#21 Posted on | Instant Rating: 8.23
    Originally posted by The King of Keith
    I'm honestly surprised no one else took Baltimore after they looked so good last week and the Eagles looked so bad. You'd have to think Baltimore's defense is a little better than Cleveland's.
Yup. That worked out well for me!



Am I in Horseville? Because I'm hearing nothing but naysayers!
Kevintripod
Banger








Since: 11.5.03
From: Mount Pleasant, Pa.

Since last post: 4 days
Last activity: 18 hours
#22 Posted on | Instant Rating: 3.53
In the words of Dethklok's lead singer Nathan Explosion:

"Bruuutal"





"You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life." - Winston Churchill
Oliver
Scrapple








Since: 20.6.02

Since last post: 1146 days
Last activity: 1140 days
#23 Posted on | Instant Rating: 2.43
I made it to week number three! Selfhighfive!



...on a roll!
Pages: Prev 1 2
Thread rated: 6.66
Pages: Prev 1 2
Thread ahead: NFL Network coming to Time Warner Cable
Next thread: College Football Wee 3: Owned by the Nerds.
Previous thread: The W Survival League: 2012.01
(271 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
Remember, this is the spread league, not the suicide pool. Even 0-16 the first week doesn't completely bury you.
- redsoxnation, Yahoo NFL Spread League (2006)
Related threads: The W Survival League: 2012.01 - No Pick Em League this year? - Survival Football - More...
The W - Football - The W Survival League: 2012.02 (Page 2)Register and log in to post!

The W™ message board

ZimBoard
©2001-2018 Brothers Zim

This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.157 seconds.