The W
Views: 99354143
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Calendar | Color chart | Log in for more!
30.9.14 1711
The W - Current Events & Politics - Sweet sexy irony
This thread has 11 referrals leading to it
Register and log in to post!
Pages: 1(2391 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (5 total)
OlFuzzyBastard
Knackwurst








Since: 28.4.02
From: Pittsburgh, PA

Since last post: 8 days
Last activity: 17 hours
AIM:  
#1 Posted on
Click Here



"Of course the people don't want war ...but, after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament or a communist dictatorship ... voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger."
----------Hermann Goering, one of the original Nazis at his Nuremberg trial in 1946
Promote this thread!
evilwaldo
Lap cheong








Since: 7.2.02
From: New York, NY

Since last post: 3385 days
Last activity: 3165 days
AIM:  
#2 Posted on | Instant Rating: 0.00
Hahahaha. How ironic. I guess that is what happens when you lose to a dead guy.





From the infamous Wrestleline SS interview:

DTD: If you were to make changes in WCW, if you were in charge and not Ric Flair, what would they be?

SS: I'd get rid of all the old guys, and push the talent that has waited to get the push. The things they are doing, it's back in the 1980s. It's just bad, man. Flair doesn't even deserve to be on the show. You've got to get rid of all the old guys. Like what Vince did, they started pushing guys. Nobody knew who The Rock was 2 years ago. He made The Rock. Now The Rock just did Saturday Night Live. You've got to start with the young talent, talent people can relate to. Who are we trying to relate to if we've got a 50 year old man out there? Are we trying to relate, so a 50 year people and above will go out and buy a f*cking little toy? That ain't gonna happen. It's a f*cking joke.

Does it remind you of any show in particular?
Pool-Boy
Lap cheong








Since: 1.8.02
From: Huntington Beach, CA

Since last post: 1293 days
Last activity: 59 days
AIM:  
ICQ:  
Y!:
#3 Posted on
I think there is a difference in the details that is lost here...
Clinton's plan would give the government full access to all emails, for any reason, with no regulation.
The current plan is to allow searched of emails and computer files, provided there is "probably cause" and a warrant is issued.
What is the big deal about updating laws to include the internet? I mean, please? It is not like we are all, all of the sudden, going to have each and every email we put out read by an FBI agent, who then determines if we are a terrorist... they have to think, and have strong reason to believe you are such a person, and have it approved by a court before they can read your emails. This is no different from our current laws that govern when they can search your house or car.
This is almost as bad as saying Republicans want to kill old people because they want to reform Social Security. DETAILS PEOPLE!



(edited by Pool-Boy on 26.11.02 1142)


"Pool-Boy"


Well- my ass still hurts, but lets see what happens this week...
RYDER FAKIN
Six Degrees of Me








Since: 21.2.02
From: ORLANDO

Since last post: 20 days
Last activity: 19 days
AIM:  
#4 Posted on
"What is the big deal about updating laws to include the internet? I mean, please? It is not like we are all, all of the sudden, going to have each and every email we put out read by an FBI agent, who then determines if we are a terrorist... they have to think, and have strong reason to believe you are such a person, and have it approved by a court before they can read your emails."

Elimination of freedom happens in baby steps. Click below to see what happens when the baby grows up and learns to runů

FLEA

Click Here




FLEA - 411WRESTLING.COM
Pool-Boy
Lap cheong








Since: 1.8.02
From: Huntington Beach, CA

Since last post: 1293 days
Last activity: 59 days
AIM:  
ICQ:  
Y!:
#5 Posted on
You are right one on point, Flea... all powers we grant the government have the potention to be used badfly, and that is the reason you keep a constant watch on what is going on in the governement.
However, the slippery slope argument is a bad one, because it can be applied to ANYTHING. There is a balance between personal libery and an orderly society. China, for a long long time, has been on the extreme end of that spectrum. Whehter it is the internet or something else, they are constantly punishing their people for the spread of ideas.
We are not China. We already allow search warrants for our homes, if approved by a court. The officers requesting these warrants have the burden of proof on them- they are not just handed out like candy. Your argument would suggest that because China can search anyone's house at anytime by their laws, that we would be doing the same by now. We aren't.
Just because the internet is new does not mean that reasonable adaptations of current laws and customs in this country should not be applied to it. I WANT the police to be able to serve a search warrant and access a suspect's computer files. To even suggest that we should not allow this because CHINA takes the practice too far is ridiculous. Again, WE ARE NOT CHINA.
It is right to point out the dangers... so that the regulations of such a police power are worded properly, to avoid that sort of mishandling of power, but it is not right to completely oppose something because of a worst case scenario.
Lets take that argument and put it in a different light. Gun Control. Some of the most oppresive dictatorships occured after the soon-to-be ruler removed weapons from the hands of the people. Scotland (England). China. If you pass gun control laws, the government will be able to simply take over the country, and there is nothing we, the unarmed masses, will be able to do about it.
See how idiotic this sounds? If we do not let some freak have a rocket-launcher, we will become a dictatorship. I think that the majority of people do thing that certain weapons should be limited, but to suggest by doing so that the absolute worst possibility will take place, so we should not go ahead with it, is irresponsible.
The only thing that this law changes is that email and computer files are now treated exactly like all other forms of personal property. And this is as it should be.

(edited by Pool-Boy on 27.11.02 1204)



"Pool-Boy"


Well- my ass still hurts, but lets see what happens this week...
Pages: 1Thread ahead: Henry Kissinger?!
Next thread: Sports Guy goes political(sorta)
Previous thread: More Reasons to Damn the US Public Schools
(2391 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
Click Here. Some of the more liberal people on this board might just put this off as paranoid libertarian rhetoric, but... I'm not so sure.
The W - Current Events & Politics - Sweet sexy ironyRegister and log in to post!

The W™ message board

ZimBoard
©2001-2014 Brothers Zim

This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.105 seconds.