The W
Views: 99997160
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Calendar | Color chart | Log in for more!
24.10.14 1353
The W - Current Events & Politics - Supremes rule 9-0 against Grokster
This thread has 1 referral leading to it
Register and log in to post!
Thread rated: 6.79
Pages: 1
(721 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (2 total)
CRZ
Big Brother
Administrator








Since: 9.12.01
From: ミネアポリス

Since last post: 3 min.
Last activity: 1 min.
AIM:  
ICQ:  
Y!:
#1 Posted on | Instant Rating: 8.44
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA621561?display=Breaking+News


    Studios Win Big in Grokster Case

    By John Eggerton -- Broadcasting & Cable, 6/27/2005 10:59:00 AM

    A unanimous Supreme Court dealt a blow to Grokster and fair-use advocates Monday, ruling that companies that create the technology for sharing movies, TV shows, and other digital content over the Internet may be liable for the illegal content piracy those technologies make possible.

    It was a big victory for studios and broadcasters. They argued that the vast majority of the digital file sharing over peer-to-peer computer networks that Grokester makes possible is illegal and threatens their business models and survival in the digital age.

    ...

    Saying broadcasters have to pay for their copyrighted material, NAB, which sided with the studios, had argued that shielding companies like Grokster threaten broadcasters' ability to offer geographic exclusivity for programming.

    [MORE]


More links (news.google.com)

I'll reserve comment until I see the ruling posted at the Supreme Court's website (supremecourtus.gov)...and, of course, I'll want to read how the EFF (eff.org) spins it - their press conference is happening as I type this.



CRZ
Promote this thread!
vsp
Andouille








Since: 3.1.02
From: Philly

Since last post: 3034 days
Last activity: 248 days
#2 Posted on | Instant Rating: 0.00
An early take on this (warning: blog content) suggests that while this decision may not have shat on the Betamax precedent as much as it initially appeared, the issue is in play.

Ginsburg / Rehnquist / Kennedy appear to lean towards further erosion of Betamax, Breyer / Stevens / O'Connor appear to favor maintaining most of the status quo, and Scalia / Thomas / Souter are waiting out in the hall.

Interesting times.


(edited by vsp on 27.6.05 1503)


Vanilla Ice on stardom: "I had a weekend that lasted a couple of years."
Thread rated: 6.79
Pages: 1
Thread ahead: Karl Rove named in CIA Identity Leak
Next thread: Oprah plays the card?
Previous thread: Canadian gov't passes bill while Opposition is (literally) caught sleeping
(721 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
That is a great point. I tend to think that the majority of "mainstream" America doesn't really care one way or the other what homosexuals do on their own. As I've said before, it's not my bag but more power for those it is.
- Grimis, Is this appropriate? (2003)
The W - Current Events & Politics - Supremes rule 9-0 against GroksterRegister and log in to post!

The W™ message board

ZimBoard
©2001-2014 Brothers Zim

This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.095 seconds.