The W
Views: 133981672
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Calendar | Color chart | Log in for more!
17.6.18 1932
The W - Pro Wrestling - *SPOILER* For An Upcoming WWE Buried Alive Match On PPV
This thread has 182 referrals leading to it
Register and log in to post!
Pages: 1(9457 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (12 total)
Ashanti_Fan
Braunschweiger








Since: 11.8.03
From: San Diego

Since last post: 5401 days
Last activity: 5396 days
#1 Posted on
As we've been reporting, WWE has the intention of developing a long-term Undertaker/Vince McMahon feud. The feud would see McMahon back Lesnar against Undertaker, with reports even suggesting McMahon may lead Kane against Taker in a major brad extension swap. However, we have some big news on one of the planned matches.

Currently on the Survivor Series agenda is a buried alive match between Vince McMahon and The Undertaker. This is not confirmed, but SmackDown! writers are setting a goal of building this match up, so unless something doesn't work out along the way, expect McMahon vs. Taker to be a headline match at Survivor Series.

Promote this thread!
Shem the Penman
Toulouse








Since: 16.1.02
From: The Off-Center of the Universe (aka Philadelphia)

Since last post: 1597 days
Last activity: 1395 days
#2 Posted on
Unless you're using the royal we there, I assume you copied this from a news site. In which case, it might be a nice idea to note which site you took it from.



"I do have a degree in electrical engineering... from almost 20 years ago. Punchcard systems were just becoming obsolete, we had rotary phones in the dorms, and a modem was still a gizmo the size of a shoebox into which you squooshed the phone receiver itself. In short, we lived like animals.

The instant obsolesence is why I became a writer. The rate of punctuation in a sentence doesn't double every 18 friggin' months, and you never have some 22-year-old looming over your shoulder, shaking his head, saying "dude... you're still using adverbs...?"

-- Bob Harris
DarrylTheHitman
Potato korv








Since: 21.9.02
From: Kitimat, British Columbia, Canada

Since last post: 4613 days
Last activity: 4232 days
#3 Posted on
About time someone buried Vinnie Mac instead of the other way around...



Mike Sweetser
Boerewors








Since: 2.1.02
From: Seattle, Washington

Since last post: 4417 days
Last activity: 4309 days
#4 Posted on
(deleted by CRZ on 3.9.03 0239)
Liz
Chipolata








Since: 26.8.03
From: Ironton, Ohio

Since last post: 4008 days
Last activity: 3071 days
#5 Posted on
    Originally posted by DarrylTheHitman
    About time someone buried Vinnie Mac instead of the other way around...


*snort*

Vince, for the love of god. You ain't drawing no PPV customers by headlining your own show. Make it Taker/Kane (for the 7 billionth time) or Taker/Lesner, but please -- no more McMahons in PPV matches.

Not to mention you're pushing 60! Enough!

Ach.



Sole defender and champion of Linda McMahon!



The true dominant female of the WWE!
Hunger hurts, but starving works.
Kevintripod
Banger








Since: 11.5.03
From: Mount Pleasant, Pa.

Since last post: 18 hours
Last activity: 18 hours
#6 Posted on
(deleted by CRZ on 3.9.03 0239)
Wolfram J. Paulovich
Frankfurter








Since: 11.11.02
From: Fat City, Baby

Since last post: 4289 days
Last activity: 3660 days
#7 Posted on
(deleted by CRZ on 3.9.03 0239)
Melon' Head
Bauerwurst








Since: 27.7.03
From: Toledo ohio

Since last post: 4519 days
Last activity: 4499 days
#8 Posted on
(deleted by CRZ on 3.9.03 0239)
CRZ
Big Brother
Administrator








Since: 9.12.01
From: ミネアポリス

Since last post: 5 days
Last activity: 49 min.
ICQ:  
#9 Posted on | Instant Rating: 8.65
    Originally posted by Ashanti_Fan
    As we've been reporting, WWE has the intention of developing a long-term Undertaker/Vince McMahon feud. The feud would see McMahon back Lesnar against Undertaker, with reports even suggesting McMahon may lead Kane against Taker in a major brad extension swap. However, we have some big news on one of the planned matches.

    Currently on the Survivor Series agenda is a buried alive match between Vince McMahon and The Undertaker. This is not confirmed, but SmackDown! writers are setting a goal of building this match up, so unless something doesn't work out along the way, expect McMahon vs. Taker to be a headline match at Survivor Series.


No more cut and paste only, please. Add an attribution (that means "tell us where you got it") and also add either of (1) your opinion about what you're pasting, or (2) tell us WHY you're pasting it and what you hope to see in the way of ensuing discussion.

Do this again and you're banned.

(Also, typing "*SPOILER*" doesn't work so well when you immediately follow it up with your spoiler - try to develop some creativity next time)

Everybody else: take a chill pill.

(edited by CRZ on 3.9.03 0242)


CRZ
Ashanti_Fan
Braunschweiger








Since: 11.8.03
From: San Diego

Since last post: 5401 days
Last activity: 5396 days
#10 Posted on
Actually, I got this from www.purewwfrage.com, and it said, *Spoiler*, on the top
raygun
Chorizo








Since: 24.7.02
From: winnipeg

Since last post: 4365 days
Last activity: 1910 days
#11 Posted on
CENSORSHIP!@



+ raygun +

WAWF Online: Wicked backyard shit
Dave Gagnon
Mettwurst








Since: 25.7.03
From: Rimouski

Since last post: 5036 days
Last activity: 5033 days
#12 Posted on
That is one great source. This website has been breaking news stories for YEARS.





The 20 worst writers of the IWC! Read it at www.1ryderfakin.com/gagnonmain.htm !!!
Pages: 1Thread ahead: Macho Man rap sample
Next thread: how much more must we suffer?!
Previous thread: Raw 9-1-03
(9457 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
I think the Rock/Benoit match at Fully Loaded was the right call. First off, you have to think back at the time and place of this match.
- A Fan, What If...? (2002)
The W - Pro Wrestling - *SPOILER* For An Upcoming WWE Buried Alive Match On PPVRegister and log in to post!

The W™ message board

ZimBoard
©2001-2018 Brothers Zim

This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 1.57 seconds.