The W
Views: 100235083
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Calendar | Color chart | Log in for more!
30.10.14 1152
The W - Current Events & Politics - Senate approves detainee protection bill
This thread has 2 referrals leading to it
Register and log in to post!
Thread rated: 5.74
Pages: 1
(654 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (6 total)
messenoir
Summer sausage








Since: 20.2.02
From: Columbia, MO

Since last post: 553 days
Last activity: 419 days
AIM:  
#1 Posted on | Instant Rating: 6.00
http://www.iht.com/articles/2005/10/06/news/detain.php

Kudos to Democrats and Republicans passing this bill so handily. I sincerely hope this is not vetoed by the White House.



A strict constructionist interprets the Constitution according to the language and original intent of the text at the time of its writing, in much the same way as a fundamentalist views the Bible. Fortunately, for strict constructionists, they have been endowed by God with the superhuman gift of being able to read the minds of people who died 200 years ago. Naturally, they use this power only for good -
America (The Book)
Promote this thread!
drjayphd
Scrapple
Moderator








Since: 22.4.02
From: Long Island

Since last post: 3 days
Last activity: 3 days
AIM:  
ICQ:  
Y!:
#2 Posted on | Instant Rating: 5.69
If it si, Bush is gonna have some 'splainin' to do. The potential for bad press outweighs any justification he could have.



You wanted the best, you got... Out of Context Quote of the Week.

"...but that doesn't mean he can't relate an amusing anecdote about the Haiti Kid and one of the Frenchman's testicles." (Hogan's My Dad)

AWArulz
Knackwurst








Since: 28.1.02
From: Louisville, KY

Since last post: 1 day
Last activity: 6 hours
AIM:  
Y!:
#3 Posted on | Instant Rating: 7.28
Look,I am all for treating prisoners of war right and all, but there are times when getting information out of a war prisoner might save thousands of lives. So signing this bill handcuffs the president's military. So I will be disappointed if he doesn't veto it.



We'll be back right after order has been restored here in the Omni Center.
DrDirt
Banger








Since: 8.10.03
From: flyover country

Since last post: 7 days
Last activity: 5 hours
#4 Posted on | Instant Rating: 7.35
    Originally posted by AWArulz
    Look,I am all for treating prisoners of war right and all, but there are times when getting information out of a war prisoner might save thousands of lives. So signing this bill handcuffs the president's military. So I will be disappointed if he doesn't veto it.


Except that as the level of inhumane treatment increases AWA, the level of accuracy decreases. My heart says do whatever to these bastards but my head says that it creates more problems than it solves.



Perception is reality
JoshMann
Andouille








Since: 17.11.03
From: Tallahassee, FL

Since last post: 2299 days
Last activity: 2296 days
AIM:  
Y!:
#5 Posted on | Instant Rating: 6.13
The bill passed through the Senate 90-9, so even if Bush does veto it, they have more than enough of the required 67 votes to overturn that veto. At least in the Senate. The tricky part will be getting 2/3 in the House, which are far more Bush-supportive. Also it's dicey because each and every member of the House will be going back to their district this time next year to explain themselves one way or the other.

The bottom line is that for better or for worse, how the house acts on this may be decided by opinion polling. Especially since Presidential election support isn't what it was a year ago.




(edited by Blanket Jackson on 7.10.05 1131)

"He's too much of gentleman to assume that the lady he is with would have a disease and he's man enough to raise any offspring that should arise. HE IS AL WILSON."[-DEAN~, 7/22/05]
ekedolphin
Scrapple








Since: 12.1.02
From: Indianapolis, IN; now residing in Suffolk, VA

Since last post: 133 days
Last activity: 6 days
#6 Posted on | Instant Rating: 2.29
Here's a link to another article about the same topic.

As I understand it from reading an article in the paper a few days ago, the House has passed a similar defense budget bill, only without the anti-torture language involved. The two bodies of Congress will now have to get together to reconcile the differences, and the article I read didn't seem optimistic that the anti-torture language would remain in the bill.

If the U.S. is going to have any kind of moral authority at all to lecture the world so adamantly on human rights, this must pass. Before we can tell China that their political prisoners can't be forced to sew together soccer balls with their teeth or be killed and their body parts converted into feminine hygiene products, we must pass legislation that makes it clear, in no uncertain terms, that the U.S. does not condone torture under any circumstances.

If we're gonna be the good guys, we need to act like it.

So it doesn't surprise me at all that President Bush is against this legislation.



"I am here to use my frabjulitulity to mictifarcate your giltooney! Lo! My junurtiquity is most biollorky! Bask in the power of my meckalecka-hi, meckahiney-ho!"
--Elan, The Order of the Stick

Four-Time Wiener of the Day (5/27/02; 7/3/02; 7/30/04; 8/28/04)

The Only Five-Time (and Last) N.E.W. World Heavyweight Champion

Certified RFMC Member-- Ask To See My Credentials!

Thread rated: 5.74
Pages: 1
Thread ahead: Bombs drop and Smurfs die
Next thread: Not all terrorists are Muslim...
Previous thread: Apparent failed bombing attempt in Oklahoma
(654 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
Hey, at least we haven't elected OUR celebrity crackpots to head our major special-interest groups. Unless you count Jimmy Hoffa Jr. I suppose.
- MoeGates, John McCain (2002)
The W - Current Events & Politics - Senate approves detainee protection billRegister and log in to post!

The W™ message board

ZimBoard
©2001-2014 Brothers Zim

This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.102 seconds.