The W
Views: 100765504
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Calendar | Color chart | Log in for more!
23.11.14 1028
The W - Hockey - Scott Stevens Shocker
This thread has 3 referrals leading to it
Register and log in to post!
Thread rated: 4.01
Pages: 1
(397 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (5 total)
Dave Gagnon
Mettwurst








Since: 25.7.03
From: Rimouski

Since last post: 3734 days
Last activity: 3731 days
#1 Posted on | Instant Rating: 1.89
According to former NHL coach Michel Bergeron, Scott Stevens was actually cleared to play for the playoffs but refused to do it. He did it because with a lockout next year, he would have lost his salary insurance. He decided that these playoffs would not worth the risk.

This is a scoop that will probably be picked up by other sports stations soon. The news broke out a couple of minutes ago.

I am not saying that this is true or not but Bergie is a credible source in Canada and I'm reporting what he said.


(deleted by Dave Gagnon on 5.5.04 2004)

(resurrected by Dave Gagnon on 5.5.04 2004)

(edited by Dave Gagnon on 5.5.04 2005)

(edited by Dave Gagnon on 5.5.04 2006)

Columnist and NWA TNA recapper at www.411mania.com . Check out the good stuff NOW!

Everything I say is a lie. Except that. And that. And that. And that. And that....And that.
Promote this thread!
beefncheddar
Linguica








Since: 16.2.04
From: Mt. Pleasant, SC

Since last post: 225 days
Last activity: 50 days
#2 Posted on
Trying to put 2 and 2 together:

Are you saying that he sat out in order to retian the possibility of being able to claim that his injury ended his career, thus collecting on insurance on the deal?

I'm not sure that actually makes sense for two reasons:

1. Is his deal not guaranteed? How would sitting out the playoffs get him $$$ that he otherwise wouldn't get?
2. Before any insurer pays a claim, wouldn't they search high and low for a doctor that says his injury WASN'T the reason he had to hang 'em up?


/not claiming to be an expert
Dave Gagnon
Mettwurst








Since: 25.7.03
From: Rimouski

Since last post: 3734 days
Last activity: 3731 days
#3 Posted on | Instant Rating: 1.89
    Originally posted by beefncheddar
    Trying to put 2 and 2 together:

    Are you saying that he sat out in order to retian the possibility of being able to claim that his injury ended his career, thus collecting on insurance on the deal?


I don't think that's the case but it's an insurance-related issue. All I know is that he was cleared to play by the team's doctors and he didn't for financial reasons.

Like I said, I don't know if it's true or not but Bergeron has credible sources so I was just sharing this info with you.



Columnist and NWA TNA recapper at www.411mania.com . Check out the good stuff NOW!

Everything I say is a lie. Except that. And that. And that. And that. And that....And that.
anibanging
Italian








Since: 5.3.02

Since last post: 2048 days
Last activity: 94 days
#4 Posted on | Instant Rating: 7.15
    Originally posted by beefncheddar
    Trying to put 2 and 2 together:

    Are you saying that he sat out in order to retian the possibility of being able to claim that his injury ended his career, thus collecting on insurance on the deal?

    I'm not sure that actually makes sense for two reasons:

    1. Is his deal not guaranteed? How would sitting out the playoffs get him $$$ that he otherwise wouldn't get?
    2. Before any insurer pays a claim, wouldn't they search high and low for a doctor that says his injury WASN'T the reason he had to hang 'em up?


    /not claiming to be an expert


This case is different because of the lockout that's coming before next season. If a player is still not cleared to play because of a previous injury, then the team still has to pay him even though no one else is being paid.
However I was under the impression that it was the team doctors and not the player who are responsible for making this decision so this doens't sound quite right.
BigVitoMark
Lap cheong








Since: 10.8.02
From: Queen's University, Canada

Since last post: 3409 days
Last activity: 3318 days
ICQ:  
#5 Posted on | Instant Rating: 5.10
I've yet to see any other news source pick up this story. Where did Bergeron report this?



Don't you hate pants?
Thread rated: 4.01
Pages: 1
Thread ahead: SportsCenter 5-2
Next thread: NHL Conference Final Previews
Previous thread: Flames -Wings
(397 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
and I'm sure the WhalerCanes and their fans wouldn't mind that at all.....
- dunkndollaz, I need more OT !!!! (2002)
Related threads: Beezer's Back - Larry Robinson Fired !!!! - Going to the swamp tonight....... - More...
The W - Hockey - Scott Stevens ShockerRegister and log in to post!

The W™ message board

ZimBoard
©2001-2014 Brothers Zim

This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.066 seconds.