The W
WrestleMania 33 begins in 773,063 seconds
Views: 121875106
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Calendar | Color chart | Log in for more!
24.3.17 1915
The W - Ladies Only - Sara's Pregnancy
This thread has 36 referrals leading to it
Register and log in to post!
Pages: 1(143 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (5 total)
Miss Behaving
Weisswurst








Since: 30.6.02
From: UK

Since last post: 4604 days
Last activity: 3550 days
#1 Posted on
It really disturbs me when real life is brought into wrestling. I know why they did it, instant heel heat for Heyman but surely there must be another way than involving family. Is the Undertaker that desperate for a pop that he must involve his pregnant wife? I understand the divide between a work and real life but there are people who don't.

Then there is Heyman's suggestion about 'looking after' Sara but not the unborn child. Of course its supposed to make my skin crawl, but not look at the tv and think why are they even going there.

I just hope WWE doesn't take this any further, there really are some things that should be kept out of programming, unborn children are way up there.
Promote this thread!
Madame Manga
Boudin rouge








Since: 16.1.02
From: Silicon Valley

Since last post: 244 days
Last activity: 44 days
#2 Posted on
That whole interview sounded a lot more like Paul Heyman's idea (or at least his writing) than anyone else's. Didn't Heyman take over the stalker angle near the end, when it really went off the rails? The creepier the better in his way of thinking, I'd imagine. He's written some things for Taker that worked very well, such as the shower scene with David Flair before WM, but it's always got that icky edge to it.

That mock crucifixion stuff Undertaker did a few years back was worse than involving genuine wives and their pregnancies, in my opinion. Now that's something that *should* have stayed off TV.

(Please, Paul E., don't get any ideas...)

MM
Ana Ng
Blutwurst








Since: 6.8.02
From: Naples, FL, USA

Since last post: 4720 days
Last activity: 4294 days
#3 Posted on
Eh, well, as I've said before, none of what you've mentioned above offends me.

Sara, however, bores me to TEARS. I don't think I can describe how uninterested I am in the Undertaker's wife! The Undertaker, fine, I like him, and I always have. But his wife is incredibly dull on tv, no more, please!



As soon as you're born you start dying, so you might as well have a good time.
gmbklyn
Weisswurst








Since: 16.7.02
From: Brooklyn, NY

Since last post: 5294 days
Last activity: 4880 days
#4 Posted on
I have to agree with Ana. It would be more interesting to me if Sara had any charisma in the ring whatsoever. The whole stalker angle & her appearences on TV are flat.
emma
Cherries > Peaches








Since: 1.8.02
From: Phoenix-ish

Since last post: 364 days
Last activity: 3 hours
#5 Posted on
Have we seen Sara other than the stalker storyline? Is she trained as a wrestler?
Do we know whether they have kids already?
Pages: 1Thread ahead: I LOVE CRZ
Next thread: OK, now I'm offended
Previous thread: Soap opera storylines vs. In-ring action
(143 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
I posted most of my thoughts on the main board, but I would like to take a minute here and bitch about the lack of Spanky. Why isn't he in a meaningful fued? Wha is wrong with people? He is a great wrestler, a riot on the mic and positively dreamy!
- Toast Jr, ?!!?-Smackdown 6/19 (2003)
The W - Ladies Only - Sara's PregnancyRegister and log in to post!

The W™ message board

ZimBoard
©2001-2017 Brothers Zim

This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.089 seconds.