The W
Views: 101486727
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Calendar | Color chart | Log in for more!
20.12.14 2004
The W - Current Events & Politics - Rumsfeld = McNamara?
This thread has 3 referrals leading to it
Register and log in to post!
Pages: 1(2179 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (8 total)
spf
Scrapple








Since: 2.1.02
From: The Las Vegas of Canada

Since last post: 2 days
Last activity: 21 hours
AIM:  
#1 Posted on
It sounds like things are getting a bit ugly in the War Room (story.news.yahoo.com)



"It is well that war is so terrible, lest we grow too fond of it." - Robert E. Lee
Promote this thread!
Jakegnosis
Morcilla








Since: 26.7.02
From: Maine

Since last post: 2919 days
Last activity: 2903 days
#2 Posted on | Instant Rating: 3.91
Great! It's about time someone took that motherfucker to task.



Moo hoo ha ha.

Rangers lead the way
RYDER FAKIN
Six Degrees of Me








Since: 21.2.02
From: ORLANDO

Since last post: 21 days
Last activity: 21 days
AIM:  
#3 Posted on
Jakegnosis:
Great! It's about time someone took that motherfucker to task.

For what? Having * crazy * thoughts like this?

The first is why, in an era when American military dominance comes in both the quality of its technology and of its troops, the defense secretary prefers emphasizing long-range precision weapons to putting boots on the ground.

The hawks are restless and in a televised war, the fifteen minutes of fame quotient gets maxed out, as everyone rushes to get their soundbytes heard. Next thing you know the * brilliant * field generals will allow a washed up journalist to write their battle plans in the sand...without turning him over to the enemy, that is.

FLEA



FLEA - 411WRESTLING.COM
commie_050
Cotechino








Since: 8.8.02
From: San Antonio, TX

Since last post: 3805 days
Last activity: 3803 days
#4 Posted on
Notice how Rummy has changed from referring the warplan from a collaborative effort to referring to it as Gen. Tommy Franks' plan recently?



If you don't mark for Sid, something is wrong with you.




What
lesser-known Simpsons character are you?


Brought to you by the good folks at sacwriters.com.
Davros
Blutwurst








Since: 22.8.02
From: Between thought and Reality, TZ

Since last post: 2717 days
Last activity: 2711 days
#5 Posted on
"Dear Idiot,

....nah, never mind.

Love,
CRZ"

>thinks to self< "Just like I thought, no balls, no brains, all talk."

Dear PATHETIC Idiot,

.......not gonna waste my time anymore.

Love,
Davros

P.S.-Ban me you conservative twit. And fuck all your ass kissers. You'll make a smart comment, but I win, because I won't read your reply-- BIATCH!!!

Word Lif3.

P.P.S.-Grut, you're absolutely right.

P.P.P.S.-CRZ, don't be mad, just continue being the king of your worl...BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!




"Don't hate the Playa, hate the Game!"
David Adams
Boerewors








Since: 2.1.02
From: NJ

Since last post: 38 days
Last activity: 1 day
AIM:  
#6 Posted on
You're really trying too hard, you know?
DMC
Liverwurst








Since: 8.1.02
From: Modesto, CA

Since last post: 3534 days
Last activity: 3528 days
#7 Posted on
I say *don't* ban him, just in spite.

DMC



"Some mathematicians did try to make the calculations, and the result was a rather acrimonious confrontation between themselves and some of the leading Darwinists at the Wistar Institute in Philadelphia in 1967. The report of the exchange in fascinating, not just because of the substance of the mathematical challenge, but even more because of the logic of the Darwinist response. ...[T]he mathematician D.S. Ulam argued that it was highly improbable that the eye could have evolved by the accumulation of small mutations, because the number of mutations would have to be so large and the time available was not nearly long enough for them to appear. Sir Peter Medawar and C.H. Waddington responded that Ulam was doing his science backwards; the fact was that the eye *had* evolved and therefore the mathematical difficulties must only be apparent. Ernst Mayr observed that Ulam's calculations were based on assumptions that might be unfounded, and concluded that 'Somehow or other by adjusting these figures we will come out alright. We are comforted by the fact that evolution has occured.'" - Phillip Johnson, *Darwin on Trial*
Nate The Snake
Liverwurst








Since: 9.1.02
From: Wichita, Ks

Since last post: 3807 days
Last activity: 3276 days
AIM:  
#8 Posted on
Guys... don't feed the trolls.



Kansas-born and deeply ashamed
The last living La Parka Marka

"They that can give up essential liberty to gain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin
Pages: 1Thread ahead: Fun With Amendments
Next thread: Islamic fundamentalists in Northern Iraq
Previous thread: A perspective from the other side...
(2179 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
There is no "we're taking our money back from them." Vieques IS we. They are part of the United States (as are, I might add, those New York City Democrats). I don't understand how you see this as punishing some bastard stepchild.
The W - Current Events & Politics - Rumsfeld = McNamara?Register and log in to post!

The W™ message board

ZimBoard
©2001-2014 Brothers Zim

This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.133 seconds.