What are they going to do with the Royal Rumble winner?
Does he get a shot at both belts (2 matches in one night)? Or possibly a three way match to unify the two titles at Mania and be done with the "Brand Extention" (tm).
With rumors of Rock vs Goldberg as one of the mains, the possible return of Austin and the inevitable super match-up of Brock and Angle, the possibilities for Wrestlemania are quite intriguing. I'm just wondering how the traditional Rumble winner title shot will be handled.
"Well, you can't involve friendship with business. It has to be one or the other. It's either business or friendship, or hit the bricks!" --Life Lessons from "The Tao of Bobby the Brain Heenan" Uncensored 2000 preview
My theory? It depends on which brand the winner is on. If it's a RAW Superstar, he'll fight for the World Title. If it's SmackDown, then it'll be for the WWE Title.
Imagine Dingbat doing babytalk: philosphosize upon your inner warrriorness...(baby)waahh....(Dingbat)destructivity and iglooitis seem to be deterrring the inner warrior from enveloping you....(baby) waahh....(Dingbat)magnodestructivation will be your salvation...(wife) the baby wants its bottle....(Dingbat) that was the message I was conveying to the greatness of warriorness in it magnanimous omnipotent hemotoma.
-The Warrior and his new daughter, according to redsoxnation.
World Wildlife Fund has no reason to "throw a few bucks" at the sleazeball who squatted on the domain. They can sue for the domain and court costs. They own the WWF trademark, so the squatter doesn't have a legal leg to stand on.