The W
Views: 121026691
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Calendar | Color chart | Log in for more!
20.2.17 1859
The W - Pro Wrestling - ROH PPV
This thread has 5 referrals leading to it
Register and log in to post!
Thread rated: 4.85
Pages: 1
(3097 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (2 total)
Scottyflamingo
Bratwurst








Since: 23.6.10
From: Auburn, AL

Since last post: 1313 days
Last activity: 1041 days
#1 Posted on | Instant Rating: 2.77
Why does ROH not have televised PPV anymore? Are they getting it back anytime soon?

I've been wanting to get back into it, but saw that the shows are Internet PPV and I don't really want to watch a show at my computer.
Promote this thread!
thecubsfan
Scrapple
Moderator








Since: 10.12.01
From: Aurora, IL

Since last post: 4 hours
Last activity: 1 hour
#2 Posted on | Instant Rating: 10.00
I believe they make more money per buy off the internet PPV and there's a lot less overhead - where one bad TV PPV could seriously hurt the company, an internet one costs a lot less.

They also didn't like the lag between when they would tape a PPV and when it would air, especially with them doing weekly TV beside the PPV.

Since live PPVs would be an even greater expense, it's more likely everyone will figure out easy way to get video from your computer to your TV than another ROH PPV the old way.



thecubsfan.com - luchablog
Thread rated: 4.85
Pages: 1
Thread ahead: NXT Season 2 - Episode 9 - 8-3-10 "Kissing Contest"
Next thread: Samoa Joe Suspended
Previous thread: SmackDown! #571 7-30-10
(3097 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
It may go up, but it'd be not so good for a public company to be misleading invenstors about it's business. There's little chance they're making up the numbers to spite ECW or something.
- thecubsfan, Vengeance Buy Numbers Released (2005)
Related threads: WGTT to reunite in ROH - Great Jim Cornette interview - ROH Question - More...
The W - Pro Wrestling - ROH PPVRegister and log in to post!

The W™ message board

ZimBoard
©2001-2017 Brothers Zim

This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.83 seconds.