The W
Views: 102294180
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Calendar | Color chart | Log in for more!
28.1.15 2230
The W - Baseball - Revenge on the Padres!
This thread has 1 referral leading to it
Register and log in to post!
Thread rated: 7.82
Pages: 1
(960 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (2 total)
Eddie Famous
Andouille








Since: 11.12.01
From: Catlin IL

Since last post: 2 days
Last activity: 2 hours
#1 Posted on | Instant Rating: 6.41

Somehow seems fit that the two leading wildcarders 20 years after 1984 are the Cubs and the vile Padres.

And I get to sit and watch Prior pitch spineless baseball in the first game of the crucial series...gaaah!

The 84 Cubs had a much better relief crew than the 04 team, and a veteran rotation...but the 04 lineup should produce more runs by a bit.

The 84 Padres had Kurt Bevacqua! What do the 04 Pads have?

Seriously, this is going to be fun and ulcer inducing.



"In the sky. Lord, in the sky..."
Promote this thread!
Guru Zim
SQL Dejection
Administrator








Since: 9.12.01
From: Bay City, OR

Since last post: 1 day
Last activity: 46 min.
AIM:  
ICQ:  
Y!:
#2 Posted on | Instant Rating: 8.81
Cub Busters '04.


Muhahaha



Willful ignorance of science is not commendable. Refusing to learn the difference between a credible source and a shill is criminally stupid.
Thread rated: 7.82
Pages: 1
Thread ahead: St. Louis gets Larry Walker for NOTHING
Next thread: Griffey DOWN
Previous thread: Players' music
(960 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
They're also on the verge of getting Marlon Byrd from the Phillies for Jeff Bennett... I must say that I've been impressed by Melvin's moves the past couple of years.
- Hurrikane757k, Carlos Lee traded to Brewers (2004)
Related threads: #1 Draft Choice already arrested. - MLB Draft - Who do the Pads Pick? - San Diego Padres are for real (AKA - How I jinxed the Padres 2004 season) - More...
The W - Baseball - Revenge on the Padres!Register and log in to post!

The W™ message board

ZimBoard
©2001-2015 Brothers Zim

This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.142 seconds.