I wasn't able to watch RAW live last night, but taped it. I haven't watched my tape yet, so have been avoiding wrestling boards and websites and such so far today to avoid any spoilers. I even avoided looking at any subject lines here on the board in case there was anything spoiled in a subject line. My question....without spoiling anything, can anybody tell me if it was a good Raw and if there were any major storylines or anything like that in the show? Please don't reply with something like: RAW WAS AWESOME BECAUSE BENOIT GOT A TITLE MATCH AND WON THE TITLE!! - because that would most definately spoil the show for me. Just a, "yes it was a really good show on par with what they've been doing lately" or a "No, this was a pretty bad Raw" would suffice. No major plot points divulged or anything like that, please.
I never realized how much of my daily internet surfing includes wrestling related web sites until I tried to avoid going to those sites for a whole day, and want to know if the show was good enough to warrant me going through the trouble to watch the show unspoiled later tonight.
I don't mean to be rude. But seriously, it's about an hour and a half of your life if you skip through commercials. Really, that's not too long when you stop and consider it. You'll probably spend four times that sleeping today.
My point is, don't agonize over the decision, it's a simple choice. If you've liked the way the storylines are going over the last month, watch. If you think they suck, then don't.
He already did. Polka dots. It happened. And Dusty is the man who beat Flair but that's not exactly a short list. And Dusty was the booker. Dusty was one of the greatest promos ever in wrestling and a guilty pleasure as a color commentator.