User Post (7 total)
waffleking Pickled pork Since: 2.10.02 From: Missouri Since last post: 3859 days Last activity: 1548 days # 1 Posted on 28.4.03 1633.52 Steve Austin is expected to return to RAW tonight, now that the Rock is expected to be gone for months. No details regarding the role Austin will play are currently available. One can assume that Jim Ross will be a factor in the Austin return angle, but that is not confirmed. Jonathan Coachman is still set to announce RAW tonight. Credit: WrestlingObserver.com If the writers can pull it off, Austin and Goldberg could be huge. Of course these are the same writers that have botched every other dream match (besides Rock/Hogan last year). "You look like you just got done f**king the next door neighbor's cat," Norman Darter Promote this thread!
Freeway Scrapple Since: 3.1.02 From: Calgary Since last post: 1336 days Last activity: 1024 days # 2 Posted on 28.4.03 1649.07 | Instant Rating: 5.96 Yeah, but look at the great feuds Austin has been involved in: Rock v. Austin [WM XV] Austin v. HBK & DX [WM XIV] Austin v. Bret Hart & Hart Foundation [WM XIII] Austin v. Angle [around InVasion time] Austin v. HHH [after his return] Let's face it, Steve Austin could make any feud worth watching. Quest for Lord Stanley's Cup Canucks & Wild tied 1-1 Mighty Ducks lead Stars 2-0 Senators & Flyers tied 1-1 Devils lead Lightning 2-0
asteroidboy Andouille Since: 22.1.02 From: Texas Since last post: 2460 days Last activity: 1368 days # 3 Posted on 28.4.03 1720.18 | Instant Rating: 4.95
At least with Austin/Goldberg, there might be some transition punches. Sheesh. -- Asteroid Boy Wiener of the day: 23.7.02 "My brother saw the Undertaker walking through an airport." - Rex "Was he no-selling?" - Me
Shem the Penman Toulouse Since: 16.1.02 From: The Off-Center of the Universe (aka Philadelphia) Since last post: 1295 days Last activity: 1093 days # 4 Posted on 28.4.03 1837.14 If we're due for Austin/Goldberg, that means the predicted (or perhaps dreaded) Triple H/Goldberg showdown at Badd Blood will be pushed further down the line. Hmm ... wasn't the reason Booker jobbed at Wrestlemania supposed to be that Trips had to keep looking strong so he could face Goldberg in a couple months? Don't mind me, just saying. Ah well. We'll see. (edited by Shem the Penman on 28.4.03 1938) "next to of course god america i love you land of the pilgrims' and so forth oh say can you see by the dawn's early my country tis of centuries come and go and are no more what of it we should worry in every language even deafanddumb thy sons acclaim your glorious name by gorry by jingo by gee by gosh by gum why talk of beauty what could be more beaut- iful than these heroic happy dead who rushed like lions to the roaring slaughter they did not stop to think they died instead then shall the voice of liberty be mute?" He spoke. And drank rapidly a glass of water
StampedeFan23 Morcilla Since: 12.1.02 From: BC, Canada Since last post: 3083 days Last activity: 2619 days # 5 Posted on 28.4.03 1847.09 Geez, who gets to play heel in that match up, Austin or Cold Beer? Are you ready for Mahkan-mania to run wild all over you? I mark for Molly Holly and Lance Storm.
Lord of the Manor Chourico Since: 24.2.03 From: London, United Kingdom Since last post: 1635 days Last activity: 787 days # 6 Posted on 28.4.03 1850.38 Originally posted by StampedeFan23 Geez, who gets to play heel in that match up, Austin or Cold Beer? Goldberg would end up the heel... no doubt about it. The fans wouldn't have it any other way. "The queen is dead"
Spaceman Spiff Knackwurst Since: 2.1.02 From: Philly Suburbs Since last post: 87 days Last activity: 2 days
AIM: # 7 Posted on 28.4.03 2109.12
Isn't Austin's neck in bad shape? If he does come back, I highly doubt he'll be wrestling.
Moves have year numbers added to them? Is it because they're THAT devestating and memorable that they put the year it was first used with the name of the move? Example: The Tiger Driver '91
The W message board ZimBoard ©2001-2017 Brothers Zim
This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.5 seconds.