The W
Views: 99975817
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Calendar | Color chart | Log in for more!
24.10.14 0227
The W - Pro Wrestling - RAW Ratings 03/29/04 & More Ratings
This thread has 5 referrals leading to it
Register and log in to post!
Thread rated: 4.48
Pages: 1
(6780 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (9 total)
ScottLadd
Chipolata








Since: 23.1.04
From: Douglas, Isle Of Man

Since last post: 3612 days
Last activity: 3501 days
AIM:  
#1 Posted on | Instant Rating: 1.24
FULL WWE RATINGS REPORT
by Dave Scherer @ 5:01:00 PM on 3/30/2004

This week's edition of Raw did a 4.3 cable rating, with a 7 share, according to Nielsen Media Research. That is down from last week's 4.5 but is still above the show's recent average. The highest rated quarter hour of the show was the 4.8 that they did for the overrun. The show did hours of 4.1 and 4.5.

In other ratings news, the Raw replay from 3/28 did a 1.7 cable rating, with a 2 share.

Heat, which preceded it, did a 1.0 cable rating, with a 2 share.

The 3/27 edition of Velocity did a 0.8 cable rating, with a 1 share.

The 3/27 edition of Confidential did a 0.8 cable rating, with a 2 share.

http://www.pwinsider.com
Promote this thread!
SKLOKAZOID
Bratwurst








Since: 20.3.02
From: California

Since last post: 1 day
Last activity: 4 hours
AIM:  
#2 Posted on | Instant Rating: 6.96
Okay, so... HHH jobbing = ratings. Wow, I wish I had thought of that.
redsoxnation
Scrapple








Since: 24.7.02

Since last post: 480 days
Last activity: 480 days
#3 Posted on | Instant Rating: 5.60
Nice to see them break 4 for back to back weeks, that is an encouraging sign. Even more encouraging is that they almost popped a 5 rating for the overrun involving Shelton Benjamin, which means either the fans might buy him as someone to start building up seriously, or they thought the match would suck and they were sitting around waiting for Austin to come out and drive around in circles for the last 5 minutes of the show. Hopefully, its because they actually saw Trip building someone up, rather than waiting for Godot, I mean Austin. And, a healthy difference in the overrun surrounding Benjamin than those involving Randy Orton. Perhaps Randy Orton doesn't have 'it', while Benjamin does.



Why is TVLand stealing my ideas from DEAN's Workrate Report's? They had to be stealing, as I thought I had the only demented mind that could put Bea Arthur and Abe Vigoda in a sex scene.
Dave Gagnon
Mettwurst








Since: 25.7.03
From: Rimouski

Since last post: 3704 days
Last activity: 3701 days
#4 Posted on | Instant Rating: 1.79
And what wrestler main evented these two shows?

Triple H.

Who said that he can't draw ratings?



Columnist and NWA TNA recapper at www.411mania.com . Check out the good stuff NOW!

Everything I say is a lie. Except that. And that. And that. And that. And that....And that.
Hoodle
Bauerwurst








Since: 19.12.03

Since last post: 3365 days
Last activity: 3360 days
#5 Posted on | Instant Rating: 7.47
    Originally posted by Dave Gagnon
    And what wrestler main evented these two shows?

    Triple H.

    Who said that he can't draw ratings?


Triple H main events a LOT of shows, many of which have scored decent ratings, many of which score lousy ratings, so no - it ain't Triple H's credit. You've got to think beyond simply one or two weeks.

If anything, its a combo of interest left over from last weeks lottery combined with some interest in Benjamin. (or just the former)
kokolums2
Bauerwurst








Since: 10.6.02

Since last post: 3509 days
Last activity: 3509 days
#6 Posted on | Instant Rating: 0.00
I tuned in for the two RAWs following WM, after not watching wrestling for months. What I saw wasn't interesting, and I did not tune in last monday.

What I did not like:
+I've seen all these people in all their current personnas for years now.
+I HATED that John Cena character. What is he supposed to be? Vanilla Ice II? He sounded stupid. Also not a good sign when you have to wear the home town jersey to get reactions from people.
oldschoolhero
Knackwurst








Since: 2.1.02
From: nWo Country

Since last post: 1987 days
Last activity: 1921 days
#7 Posted on | Instant Rating: 5.22
John Cena doesn't get crowd reactions just by wearing their hometown sports jerseys. That's like saying the only thing getting Mick Foley heat in 2000 were his thumbs-up pops. It's pretty ridiculous to judge a character's ability and overness based on watching one night of television, which you seem to have done.



For Relaxing Times...Make It Suntory Time

Net Hack Slasher
Banger








Since: 6.1.02
From: Outer reaches of your mind

Since last post: 3590 days
Last activity: 2010 days
#8 Posted on | Instant Rating: 6.49
I'm surprised with the high rating, it was a good show on Monday but I thought after the lottery hype it would quickly go down to high 3's maybe 4.0's if their lucky... Maybe Sklokland is right, HHH + jobbing = profit/ratings. *Looks at the Raw roster* okay he's jobbed to Benoit and Benjamin that takes care of the B's. Let's move to the C's he must job to Christian and Coach

Great point Redsox, there was no push of Austin on screen at all this week. No need for him to waste 7-minute just to cut a promo for the sake of cutting a promo just for him to be out there.

A 1.7 rating for the Raw Encore on Sunday. Is that a good rating? It sounds good. I've always found it strange that they don't replay Raw. I don't think it would take away from the original broadcast and you don't have to waste Smackdown time with a Raw recap.

**April 1, Smackdown Rating Added**

Pwinsider
-This week’s edition of Smackdown did a 3.2 broadcast rating, with a 5 share. That is down from last week’s show, which was adjusted up to a 3.4 after initially being released by Nielsen as a 3.3. It should be noted that the show was preempted in Philadelphia and Atlanta.

So Smackdown did a 3.2 with hours of (3.2, 3.2) down from last weeks 3.4(3.4, 3.4)... But the number is hard to read because of the preemptions, maybe it would have broken even with last weeks number, but last weeks SD number was nothing to jump for joy for.



smark/net attack wienerville advisory stays at BLUE alert - Guarded (With Benoit & Eddie being World & WWE champions you'd expect the alert to be Green but couldn't do it due to Trish/Y2J character switches)- 3/16

Honors for Smartest thing ever written, 5th Horseman "When Victoria, Trish, Molly, and Lilian were in the ring.. I commented to my friends that all of the 4 ladies in the ring were hotter than the all 4 that are fighting over who is the hottest in the WWE"
redsoxnation
Scrapple








Since: 24.7.02

Since last post: 480 days
Last activity: 480 days
#9 Posted on | Instant Rating: 5.65
Remember this with the SD number the previous 2 weeks compared to this week: NCAA Basketball pre-empted Survivor. Though I'm a basketball fan, that does have lower ratings than Survivor, thus a higher rated show in the timeslot opposite SD would mean a lesser audience for SD. And, off tangent a bit, but has anyone ever figured out why Viacom throws its highest rated UPN show up against one of their marquee CBS shows? Wouldn't it make sense to make UPN stronger on a night that CBS might be weak, thus at least causing a greater audience overall for the Viacom networks? Why fragment relative strength for UPN with strength for CBS?



Why is TVLand stealing my ideas from DEAN's Workrate Report's? They had to be stealing, as I thought I had the only demented mind that could put Bea Arthur and Abe Vigoda in a sex scene.
Thread rated: 4.48
Pages: 1
Thread ahead: This is Sting...The Movie
Next thread: The Great Thomas SmackDown! Report 4/1/04
Previous thread: upcoming PPV main events
(6780 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
Is there anything beyond what's on the "Here Comes the Pain" DVD (The W at Amazon) that you really need to see/would merit inclusion in a new collection on DVD? Obviously his WM20 match is on the WM20 DVD. His other PPV matches are on DVD.
The W - Pro Wrestling - RAW Ratings 03/29/04 & More RatingsRegister and log in to post!

The W™ message board

ZimBoard
©2001-2014 Brothers Zim

This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.367 seconds.